Disability rate by US city

Summary

Disability rate, US cities

Disability rate by city · all 346 cities · hover or tap a city for every figure on this page

346 items
View100%
DownloadPDFImageCSV
CitiesCleveland, Ohio
Disability rate, US citiesDarker amber is a higher share of the civilian noninstitutionalized population with a disability. Each city is a marked point on the US state map. Alaska and Hawaii are inset. Puerto Rico cities are in the ranking and table but are not drawn here.Irvine, California · Disability rate: 6.1% · Margin of error: 0.4% · With a disability: 18,727 · Without a disability: 289,046 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 307,773 · Total population: 308,160 · Total population (margin of error): 117Carmel, Indiana · Disability rate: 6.3% · Margin of error: 0.6% · With a disability: 6,301 · Without a disability: 93,738 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 100,039 · Total population: 100,501 · Total population (margin of error): 198Fishers, Indiana · Disability rate: 6.6% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 6,592 · Without a disability: 93,501 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 100,093 · Total population: 100,918 · Total population (margin of error): 35Arlington, Virginia · Disability rate: 6.7% · Margin of error: 0.4% · With a disability: 15,424 · Without a disability: 215,496 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 230,920 · Total population: 235,463Allen, Texas · Disability rate: 6.8% · Margin of error: 0.7% · With a disability: 7,306 · Without a disability: 100,044 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 107,350 · Total population: 107,684 · Total population (margin of error): 44Sunnyvale, California · Disability rate: 6.9% · Margin of error: 0.6% · With a disability: 10,511 · Without a disability: 142,169 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 152,680 · Total population: 153,455 · Total population (margin of error): 92Irving, Texas · Disability rate: 6.9% · Margin of error: 0.5% · With a disability: 17,543 · Without a disability: 236,815 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 254,358 · Total population: 255,036 · Total population (margin of error): 57Fremont, California · Disability rate: 6.9% · Margin of error: 0.4% · With a disability: 15,806 · Without a disability: 211,891 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 227,697 · Total population: 228,518 · Total population (margin of error): 57Frisco, Texas · Disability rate: 7.0% · Margin of error: 0.5% · With a disability: 14,628 · Without a disability: 195,097 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 209,725 · Total population: 210,238 · Total population (margin of error): 162Naperville, Illinois · Disability rate: 7.1% · Margin of error: 0.6% · With a disability: 10,490 · Without a disability: 137,641 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 148,131 · Total population: 149,424 · Total population (margin of error): 393The Woodlands, Texas · Disability rate: 7.1% · Margin of error: 0.6% · With a disability: 8,280 · Without a disability: 108,125 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 116,405 · Total population: 116,916 · Total population (margin of error): 5,154Alexandria, Virginia · Disability rate: 7.2% · Margin of error: 0.4% · With a disability: 10,980 · Without a disability: 141,521 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 152,501 · Total population: 156,788Pearland, Texas · Disability rate: 7.4% · Margin of error: 0.7% · With a disability: 9,250 · Without a disability: 115,961 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 125,211 · Total population: 125,983 · Total population (margin of error): 75Cambridge, Massachusetts · Disability rate: 7.4% · Margin of error: 0.6% · With a disability: 8,674 · Without a disability: 108,692 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 117,366 · Total population: 117,794 · Total population (margin of error): 60Boulder, Colorado · Disability rate: 7.5% · Margin of error: 0.7% · With a disability: 7,847 · Without a disability: 97,331 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 105,178 · Total population: 106,274 · Total population (margin of error): 49Santa Clara, California · Disability rate: 7.5% · Margin of error: 0.6% · With a disability: 9,694 · Without a disability: 118,918 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 128,612 · Total population: 129,239 · Total population (margin of error): 65McKinney, Texas · Disability rate: 7.5% · Margin of error: 0.5% · With a disability: 15,146 · Without a disability: 185,479 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 200,625 · Total population: 202,314 · Total population (margin of error): 65Highlands Ranch, Colorado · Disability rate: 7.6% · Margin of error: 0.6% · With a disability: 7,678 · Without a disability: 93,129 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 100,807 · Total population: 101,437 · Total population (margin of error): 2,176Jersey City, New Jersey · Disability rate: 7.7% · Margin of error: 0.4% · With a disability: 22,371 · Without a disability: 266,472 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 288,843 · Total population: 289,691 · Total population (margin of error): 57Miramar, Florida · Disability rate: 7.8% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 10,529 · Without a disability: 125,280 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 135,809 · Total population: 135,986 · Total population (margin of error): 63Cary, North Carolina · Disability rate: 7.8% · Margin of error: 0.6% · With a disability: 13,768 · Without a disability: 162,587 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 176,355 · Total population: 176,686 · Total population (margin of error): 139Plano, Texas · Disability rate: 8.1% · Margin of error: 0.4% · With a disability: 23,065 · Without a disability: 263,251 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 286,316 · Total population: 287,339 · Total population (margin of error): 74Ann Arbor, Michigan · Disability rate: 8.1% · Margin of error: 0.6% · With a disability: 9,768 · Without a disability: 110,866 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 120,634 · Total population: 121,179 · Total population (margin of error): 50Gilbert, Arizona · Disability rate: 8.1% · Margin of error: 0.4% · With a disability: 22,041 · Without a disability: 248,777 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 270,818 · Total population: 271,118 · Total population (margin of error): 101College Station, Texas · Disability rate: 8.2% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 9,954 · Without a disability: 111,982 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 121,936 · Total population: 122,280 · Total population (margin of error): 66Sandy Springs, Georgia · Disability rate: 8.2% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 8,788 · Without a disability: 97,830 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 106,618 · Total population: 107,198 · Total population (margin of error): 40Sugar Land, Texas · Disability rate: 8.3% · Margin of error: 0.7% · With a disability: 9,046 · Without a disability: 100,451 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 109,497 · Total population: 109,735 · Total population (margin of error): 64Charlotte, North Carolina · Disability rate: 8.3% · Margin of error: 0.3% · With a disability: 72,824 · Without a disability: 808,373 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 881,197 · Total population: 886,283 · Total population (margin of error): 226Bellevue, Washington · Disability rate: 8.3% · Margin of error: 0.6% · With a disability: 12,475 · Without a disability: 138,280 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 150,755 · Total population: 151,199 · Total population (margin of error): 61Costa Mesa, California · Disability rate: 8.5% · Margin of error: 0.7% · With a disability: 9,352 · Without a disability: 100,760 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 110,112 · Total population: 110,538 · Total population (margin of error): 83Richardson, Texas · Disability rate: 8.5% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 10,047 · Without a disability: 107,696 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 117,743 · Total population: 118,269 · Total population (margin of error): 91Santa Ana, California · Disability rate: 8.5% · Margin of error: 0.4% · With a disability: 26,434 · Without a disability: 283,095 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 309,529 · Total population: 311,639 · Total population (margin of error): 89Paterson, New Jersey · Disability rate: 8.6% · Margin of error: 0.6% · With a disability: 13,469 · Without a disability: 143,364 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 156,833 · Total population: 157,660 · Total population (margin of error): 137Carlsbad, California · Disability rate: 8.7% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 9,804 · Without a disability: 103,332 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 113,136 · Total population: 114,500 · Total population (margin of error): 85West Jordan, Utah · Disability rate: 8.7% · Margin of error: 0.7% · With a disability: 10,031 · Without a disability: 105,722 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 115,753 · Total population: 116,277 · Total population (margin of error): 73Fullerton, California · Disability rate: 8.7% · Margin of error: 0.7% · With a disability: 12,216 · Without a disability: 128,224 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 140,440 · Total population: 141,278 · Total population (margin of error): 65Lee's Summit, Missouri · Disability rate: 8.8% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 8,965 · Without a disability: 92,763 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 101,728 · Total population: 102,583 · Total population (margin of error): 51Salinas, California · Disability rate: 8.8% · Margin of error: 0.6% · With a disability: 14,217 · Without a disability: 146,842 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 161,059 · Total population: 161,993 · Total population (margin of error): 109Overland Park, Kansas · Disability rate: 8.8% · Margin of error: 0.5% · With a disability: 17,298 · Without a disability: 178,559 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 195,857 · Total population: 197,199 · Total population (margin of error): 94Fort Collins, Colorado · Disability rate: 8.9% · Margin of error: 0.6% · With a disability: 14,890 · Without a disability: 153,016 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 167,906 · Total population: 169,705 · Total population (margin of error): 63Carrollton, Texas · Disability rate: 8.9% · Margin of error: 0.7% · With a disability: 11,783 · Without a disability: 120,327 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 132,110 · Total population: 132,741 · Total population (margin of error): 170San Mateo, California · Disability rate: 8.9% · Margin of error: 0.7% · With a disability: 9,244 · Without a disability: 94,060 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 103,304 · Total population: 103,555 · Total population (margin of error): 58Centennial, Colorado · Disability rate: 9.0% · Margin of error: 0.7% · With a disability: 9,504 · Without a disability: 96,547 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 106,051 · Total population: 107,386 · Total population (margin of error): 70Orange, California · Disability rate: 9.0% · Margin of error: 0.7% · With a disability: 12,199 · Without a disability: 123,329 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 135,528 · Total population: 138,723 · Total population (margin of error): 68Corona, California · Disability rate: 9.0% · Margin of error: 0.6% · With a disability: 14,251 · Without a disability: 143,798 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 158,049 · Total population: 158,839 · Total population (margin of error): 97Aurora, Illinois · Disability rate: 9.1% · Margin of error: 0.6% · With a disability: 16,209 · Without a disability: 162,830 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 179,039 · Total population: 179,867 · Total population (margin of error): 480Coral Springs, Florida · Disability rate: 9.1% · Margin of error: 0.7% · With a disability: 12,113 · Without a disability: 121,594 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 133,707 · Total population: 133,962 · Total population (margin of error): 64Madison, Wisconsin · Disability rate: 9.1% · Margin of error: 0.5% · With a disability: 24,880 · Without a disability: 249,135 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 274,015 · Total population: 275,568 · Total population (margin of error): 76Fontana, California · Disability rate: 9.1% · Margin of error: 0.6% · With a disability: 19,211 · Without a disability: 192,313 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 211,524 · Total population: 211,921 · Total population (margin of error): 98Garland, Texas · Disability rate: 9.1% · Margin of error: 0.5% · With a disability: 22,246 · Without a disability: 222,463 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 244,709 · Total population: 245,298 · Total population (margin of error): 145Daly City, California · Disability rate: 9.3% · Margin of error: 0.7% · With a disability: 9,480 · Without a disability: 92,393 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 101,873 · Total population: 102,560 · Total population (margin of error): 52Rancho Cucamonga, California · Disability rate: 9.4% · Margin of error: 0.6% · With a disability: 16,081 · Without a disability: 155,760 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 171,841 · Total population: 174,693 · Total population (margin of error): 83Enterprise, Nevada · Disability rate: 9.4% · Margin of error: 0.6% · With a disability: 21,696 · Without a disability: 209,970 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 231,666 · Total population: 232,043 · Total population (margin of error): 5,278Ontario, California · Disability rate: 9.5% · Margin of error: 0.6% · With a disability: 16,821 · Without a disability: 161,080 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 177,901 · Total population: 178,347 · Total population (margin of error): 66Olathe, Kansas · Disability rate: 9.5% · Margin of error: 0.7% · With a disability: 13,506 · Without a disability: 128,963 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 142,469 · Total population: 143,720 · Total population (margin of error): 63Davie, Florida · Disability rate: 9.5% · Margin of error: 1.0% · With a disability: 10,064 · Without a disability: 96,095 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 106,159 · Total population: 106,412 · Total population (margin of error): 62Austin, Texas · Disability rate: 9.5% · Margin of error: 0.3% · With a disability: 91,417 · Without a disability: 871,295 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 962,712 · Total population: 967,862 · Total population (margin of error): 373Santa Clarita, California · Disability rate: 9.5% · Margin of error: 0.6% · With a disability: 21,842 · Without a disability: 206,887 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 228,729 · Total population: 229,021 · Total population (margin of error): 97Rialto, California · Disability rate: 9.6% · Margin of error: 0.7% · With a disability: 9,940 · Without a disability: 93,518 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 103,458 · Total population: 103,866 · Total population (margin of error): 60Raleigh, North Carolina · Disability rate: 9.6% · Margin of error: 0.5% · With a disability: 44,643 · Without a disability: 419,905 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 464,548 · Total population: 470,763 · Total population (margin of error): 429San Jose, California · Disability rate: 9.6% · Margin of error: 0.2% · With a disability: 94,971 · Without a disability: 891,241 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 986,212 · Total population: 990,054 · Total population (margin of error): 201West Valley City, Utah · Disability rate: 9.7% · Margin of error: 0.6% · With a disability: 13,299 · Without a disability: 124,149 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 137,448 · Total population: 137,955 · Total population (margin of error): 55Lewisville, Texas · Disability rate: 9.7% · Margin of error: 0.7% · With a disability: 12,373 · Without a disability: 115,443 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 127,816 · Total population: 128,313 · Total population (margin of error): 470Temecula, California · Disability rate: 9.7% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 10,570 · Without a disability: 98,407 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 108,977 · Total population: 110,404 · Total population (margin of error): 64Charleston, South Carolina · Disability rate: 9.7% · Margin of error: 0.7% · With a disability: 14,561 · Without a disability: 135,415 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 149,976 · Total population: 152,014 · Total population (margin of error): 77League City, Texas · Disability rate: 9.7% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 11,083 · Without a disability: 102,975 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 114,058 · Total population: 114,885 · Total population (margin of error): 119Torrance, California · Disability rate: 9.7% · Margin of error: 0.7% · With a disability: 13,853 · Without a disability: 128,559 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 142,412 · Total population: 143,499 · Total population (margin of error): 65Jurupa Valley, California · Disability rate: 9.7% · Margin of error: 0.7% · With a disability: 10,277 · Without a disability: 95,363 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 105,640 · Total population: 106,244 · Total population (margin of error): 54Meridian, Idaho · Disability rate: 9.8% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 12,160 · Without a disability: 112,028 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 124,188 · Total population: 124,865 · Total population (margin of error): 75Chandler, Arizona · Disability rate: 9.8% · Margin of error: 0.5% · With a disability: 27,246 · Without a disability: 250,266 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 277,512 · Total population: 278,123 · Total population (margin of error): 77Elgin, Illinois · Disability rate: 9.8% · Margin of error: 0.7% · With a disability: 11,075 · Without a disability: 101,655 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 112,730 · Total population: 114,106 · Total population (margin of error): 399Concord, North Carolina · Disability rate: 9.9% · Margin of error: 0.9% · With a disability: 10,381 · Without a disability: 94,868 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 105,249 · Total population: 106,518 · Total population (margin of error): 49Durham, North Carolina · Disability rate: 9.9% · Margin of error: 0.5% · With a disability: 28,235 · Without a disability: 258,026 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 286,261 · Total population: 288,465 · Total population (margin of error): 163Anaheim, California · Disability rate: 9.9% · Margin of error: 0.4% · With a disability: 33,991 · Without a disability: 308,752 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 342,743 · Total population: 344,553 · Total population (margin of error): 138Oxnard, California · Disability rate: 9.9% · Margin of error: 0.5% · With a disability: 19,840 · Without a disability: 179,866 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 199,706 · Total population: 201,014 · Total population (margin of error): 62Sioux Falls, South Dakota · Disability rate: 10.0% · Margin of error: 0.5% · With a disability: 19,476 · Without a disability: 175,247 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 194,723 · Total population: 197,642 · Total population (margin of error): 66San Diego, California · Disability rate: 10.0% · Margin of error: 0.2% · With a disability: 133,918 · Without a disability: 1,203,567 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 1,337,485 · Total population: 1,385,061 · Total population (margin of error): 147Seattle, Washington · Disability rate: 10.0% · Margin of error: 0.3% · With a disability: 73,793 · Without a disability: 661,839 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 735,632 · Total population: 741,440 · Total population (margin of error): 121Elk Grove, California · Disability rate: 10.1% · Margin of error: 0.6% · With a disability: 17,789 · Without a disability: 159,070 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 176,859 · Total population: 177,221 · Total population (margin of error): 134Scottsdale, Arizona · Disability rate: 10.1% · Margin of error: 0.5% · With a disability: 24,237 · Without a disability: 216,275 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 240,512 · Total population: 242,169 · Total population (margin of error): 118Denver, Colorado · Disability rate: 10.1% · Margin of error: 0.3% · With a disability: 71,273 · Without a disability: 635,280 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 706,553 · Total population: 713,734Thornton, Colorado · Disability rate: 10.1% · Margin of error: 0.7% · With a disability: 14,360 · Without a disability: 127,935 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 142,295 · Total population: 142,878 · Total population (margin of error): 77Joliet, Illinois · Disability rate: 10.1% · Margin of error: 0.6% · With a disability: 14,926 · Without a disability: 132,808 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 147,734 · Total population: 149,785 · Total population (margin of error): 914Goodyear, Arizona · Disability rate: 10.1% · Margin of error: 0.9% · With a disability: 9,864 · Without a disability: 87,630 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 97,494 · Total population: 102,891 · Total population (margin of error): 62Rochester, Minnesota · Disability rate: 10.1% · Margin of error: 0.6% · With a disability: 12,133 · Without a disability: 107,738 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 119,871 · Total population: 121,638 · Total population (margin of error): 72Pasadena, California · Disability rate: 10.1% · Margin of error: 0.7% · With a disability: 13,714 · Without a disability: 121,554 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 135,268 · Total population: 136,462 · Total population (margin of error): 63Chula Vista, California · Disability rate: 10.2% · Margin of error: 0.5% · With a disability: 27,341 · Without a disability: 241,548 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 268,889 · Total population: 275,030 · Total population (margin of error): 61Fort Worth, Texas · Disability rate: 10.2% · Margin of error: 0.3% · With a disability: 94,806 · Without a disability: 834,609 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 929,415 · Total population: 941,311 · Total population (margin of error): 527Berkeley, California · Disability rate: 10.2% · Margin of error: 0.7% · With a disability: 12,231 · Without a disability: 107,670 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 119,901 · Total population: 120,223 · Total population (margin of error): 50Provo, Utah · Disability rate: 10.2% · Margin of error: 0.7% · With a disability: 11,590 · Without a disability: 101,970 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 113,560 · Total population: 114,303 · Total population (margin of error): 48Hayward, California · Disability rate: 10.2% · Margin of error: 0.6% · With a disability: 16,138 · Without a disability: 141,941 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 158,079 · Total population: 159,201 · Total population (margin of error): 69Odessa, Texas · Disability rate: 10.2% · Margin of error: 0.9% · With a disability: 11,536 · Without a disability: 101,232 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 112,768 · Total population: 114,080 · Total population (margin of error): 49Stamford, Connecticut · Disability rate: 10.2% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 13,843 · Without a disability: 121,354 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 135,197 · Total population: 135,806 · Total population (margin of error): 40Bend, Oregon · Disability rate: 10.3% · Margin of error: 0.9% · With a disability: 10,374 · Without a disability: 90,819 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 101,193 · Total population: 101,472 · Total population (margin of error): 76Arlington, Texas · Disability rate: 10.3% · Margin of error: 0.5% · With a disability: 40,428 · Without a disability: 352,939 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 393,367 · Total population: 394,769 · Total population (margin of error): 103Orlando, Florida · Disability rate: 10.3% · Margin of error: 0.5% · With a disability: 31,973 · Without a disability: 277,340 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 309,313 · Total population: 311,732 · Total population (margin of error): 141Thousand Oaks, California · Disability rate: 10.4% · Margin of error: 0.7% · With a disability: 12,978 · Without a disability: 112,179 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 125,157 · Total population: 125,676 · Total population (margin of error): 60Huntington Beach, California · Disability rate: 10.4% · Margin of error: 0.6% · With a disability: 20,331 · Without a disability: 175,197 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 195,528 · Total population: 196,010 · Total population (margin of error): 78Midland, Texas · Disability rate: 10.4% · Margin of error: 0.9% · With a disability: 13,821 · Without a disability: 119,075 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 132,896 · Total population: 133,998 · Total population (margin of error): 47Elizabeth, New Jersey · Disability rate: 10.4% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 14,087 · Without a disability: 120,872 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 134,959 · Total population: 135,887 · Total population (margin of error): 79Murrieta, California · Disability rate: 10.5% · Margin of error: 0.9% · With a disability: 11,586 · Without a disability: 99,009 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 110,595 · Total population: 111,621 · Total population (margin of error): 63Gainesville, Florida · Disability rate: 10.5% · Margin of error: 0.9% · With a disability: 14,894 · Without a disability: 126,902 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 141,796 · Total population: 143,611 · Total population (margin of error): 98Moreno Valley, California · Disability rate: 10.5% · Margin of error: 0.5% · With a disability: 22,088 · Without a disability: 187,738 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 209,826 · Total population: 210,378 · Total population (margin of error): 68Columbia, Maryland · Disability rate: 10.5% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 11,055 · Without a disability: 93,795 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 104,850 · Total population: 105,871 · Total population (margin of error): 2,631Tempe, Arizona · Disability rate: 10.6% · Margin of error: 0.7% · With a disability: 19,633 · Without a disability: 166,149 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 185,782 · Total population: 186,419 · Total population (margin of error): 81Murfreesboro, Tennessee · Disability rate: 10.6% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 16,527 · Without a disability: 139,810 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 156,337 · Total population: 157,547 · Total population (margin of error): 53Richmond, California · Disability rate: 10.7% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 12,208 · Without a disability: 102,397 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 114,605 · Total population: 115,396 · Total population (margin of error): 54Norwalk, California · Disability rate: 10.7% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 10,622 · Without a disability: 89,078 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 99,700 · Total population: 100,713 · Total population (margin of error): 59Grand Prairie, Texas · Disability rate: 10.7% · Margin of error: 0.7% · With a disability: 21,140 · Without a disability: 176,949 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 198,089 · Total population: 198,564 · Total population (margin of error): 92Arvada, Colorado · Disability rate: 10.7% · Margin of error: 0.7% · With a disability: 13,082 · Without a disability: 109,254 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 122,336 · Total population: 122,835 · Total population (margin of error): 66Brownsville, Texas · Disability rate: 10.7% · Margin of error: 0.6% · With a disability: 20,017 · Without a disability: 166,715 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 186,732 · Total population: 188,023 · Total population (margin of error): 90Riverside, California · Disability rate: 10.8% · Margin of error: 0.5% · With a disability: 33,932 · Without a disability: 280,117 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 314,049 · Total population: 316,241 · Total population (margin of error): 115Riverview, Florida · Disability rate: 10.8% · Margin of error: 0.9% · With a disability: 11,580 · Without a disability: 95,195 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 106,775 · Total population: 107,776 · Total population (margin of error): 3,794Kent, Washington · Disability rate: 10.9% · Margin of error: 0.7% · With a disability: 14,533 · Without a disability: 119,355 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 133,888 · Total population: 135,015 · Total population (margin of error): 73Edinburg, Texas · Disability rate: 10.9% · Margin of error: 1.1% · With a disability: 10,716 · Without a disability: 87,780 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 98,496 · Total population: 102,561 · Total population (margin of error): 51Pomona, California · Disability rate: 10.9% · Margin of error: 0.6% · With a disability: 16,004 · Without a disability: 130,791 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 146,795 · Total population: 148,391 · Total population (margin of error): 54South Fulton, Georgia · Disability rate: 10.9% · Margin of error: 1.4% · With a disability: 11,881 · Without a disability: 96,830 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 108,711 · Total population: 109,157 · Total population (margin of error): 51Washington, District of Columbia · Disability rate: 11.0% · Margin of error: 0.4% · With a disability: 72,611 · Without a disability: 590,403 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 663,014 · Total population: 672,079Quincy, Massachusetts · Disability rate: 11.0% · Margin of error: 1.0% · With a disability: 11,031 · Without a disability: 89,691 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 100,722 · Total population: 101,361 · Total population (margin of error): 35Bakersfield, California · Disability rate: 11.0% · Margin of error: 0.5% · With a disability: 44,682 · Without a disability: 361,753 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 406,435 · Total population: 408,366 · Total population (margin of error): 97Clovis, California · Disability rate: 11.0% · Margin of error: 0.7% · With a disability: 13,447 · Without a disability: 108,747 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 122,194 · Total population: 122,719 · Total population (margin of error): 69Houston, Texas · Disability rate: 11.0% · Margin of error: 0.2% · With a disability: 251,204 · Without a disability: 2,030,527 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 2,281,731 · Total population: 2,300,419 · Total population (margin of error): 172Nashville-Davidson metropolitan government (balance), Tennessee · Disability rate: 11.0% · Margin of error: 0.3% · With a disability: 74,802 · Without a disability: 603,777 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 678,579 · Total population: 684,298 · Total population (margin of error): 77Downey, California · Disability rate: 11.1% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 12,279 · Without a disability: 98,811 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 111,090 · Total population: 111,793 · Total population (margin of error): 61Round Rock, Texas · Disability rate: 11.1% · Margin of error: 0.9% · With a disability: 13,681 · Without a disability: 109,962 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 123,643 · Total population: 124,288 · Total population (margin of error): 898Tuscaloosa, Alabama · Disability rate: 11.1% · Margin of error: 0.9% · With a disability: 11,784 · Without a disability: 94,698 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 106,482 · Total population: 107,699 · Total population (margin of error): 46Westminster, Colorado · Disability rate: 11.1% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 12,733 · Without a disability: 102,252 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 114,985 · Total population: 115,546 · Total population (margin of error): 83Omaha, Nebraska · Disability rate: 11.1% · Margin of error: 0.3% · With a disability: 53,763 · Without a disability: 428,704 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 482,467 · Total population: 488,197 · Total population (margin of error): 68Los Angeles, California · Disability rate: 11.1% · Margin of error: 0.1% · With a disability: 426,793 · Without a disability: 3,403,070 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 3,829,863 · Total population: 3,857,897 · Total population (margin of error): 75Garden Grove, California · Disability rate: 11.2% · Margin of error: 0.6% · With a disability: 18,973 · Without a disability: 150,947 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 169,920 · Total population: 170,603 · Total population (margin of error): 85San Francisco, California · Disability rate: 11.2% · Margin of error: 0.3% · With a disability: 93,209 · Without a disability: 739,000 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 832,209 · Total population: 836,321Pembroke Pines, Florida · Disability rate: 11.2% · Margin of error: 0.9% · With a disability: 19,040 · Without a disability: 150,605 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 169,645 · Total population: 170,557 · Total population (margin of error): 64Roseville, California · Disability rate: 11.3% · Margin of error: 0.7% · With a disability: 17,127 · Without a disability: 134,393 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 151,520 · Total population: 152,438 · Total population (margin of error): 80Dallas, Texas · Disability rate: 11.4% · Margin of error: 0.3% · With a disability: 146,596 · Without a disability: 1,143,264 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 1,289,860 · Total population: 1,299,553 · Total population (margin of error): 141Fargo, North Dakota · Disability rate: 11.4% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 14,522 · Without a disability: 112,927 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 127,449 · Total population: 129,064 · Total population (margin of error): 49West Palm Beach, Florida · Disability rate: 11.4% · Margin of error: 0.9% · With a disability: 13,440 · Without a disability: 104,496 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 117,936 · Total population: 119,508 · Total population (margin of error): 117Santa Maria, California · Disability rate: 11.4% · Margin of error: 0.9% · With a disability: 12,444 · Without a disability: 96,723 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 109,167 · Total population: 109,880 · Total population (margin of error): 48Long Beach, California · Disability rate: 11.4% · Margin of error: 0.4% · With a disability: 51,977 · Without a disability: 403,201 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 455,178 · Total population: 458,491 · Total population (margin of error): 71Renton, Washington · Disability rate: 11.4% · Margin of error: 0.9% · With a disability: 11,988 · Without a disability: 92,937 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 104,925 · Total population: 105,279 · Total population (margin of error): 70East Los Angeles, California · Disability rate: 11.4% · Margin of error: 0.7% · With a disability: 13,092 · Without a disability: 101,378 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 114,470 · Total population: 114,617 · Total population (margin of error): 3,058Tallahassee, Florida · Disability rate: 11.4% · Margin of error: 0.7% · With a disability: 22,476 · Without a disability: 173,987 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 196,463 · Total population: 199,696 · Total population (margin of error): 118Miami, Florida · Disability rate: 11.5% · Margin of error: 0.5% · With a disability: 50,525 · Without a disability: 390,428 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 440,953 · Total population: 446,663 · Total population (margin of error): 77Phoenix, Arizona · Disability rate: 11.5% · Margin of error: 0.2% · With a disability: 184,831 · Without a disability: 1,427,159 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 1,611,990 · Total population: 1,624,832 · Total population (margin of error): 112Simi Valley, California · Disability rate: 11.5% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 14,425 · Without a disability: 111,010 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 125,435 · Total population: 125,769 · Total population (margin of error): 77Hillsboro, Oregon · Disability rate: 11.5% · Margin of error: 0.9% · With a disability: 12,243 · Without a disability: 93,891 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 106,134 · Total population: 107,050 · Total population (margin of error): 43Broken Arrow, Oklahoma · Disability rate: 11.5% · Margin of error: 0.6% · With a disability: 13,296 · Without a disability: 101,920 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 115,216 · Total population: 115,919 · Total population (margin of error): 85Burbank, California · Disability rate: 11.5% · Margin of error: 1.0% · With a disability: 12,097 · Without a disability: 92,708 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 104,805 · Total population: 105,165 · Total population (margin of error): 81Palmdale, California · Disability rate: 11.6% · Margin of error: 0.7% · With a disability: 19,144 · Without a disability: 146,201 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 165,345 · Total population: 165,487 · Total population (margin of error): 66Aurora, Colorado · Disability rate: 11.6% · Margin of error: 0.4% · With a disability: 44,802 · Without a disability: 341,933 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 386,735 · Total population: 390,201 · Total population (margin of error): 117Atlanta, Georgia · Disability rate: 11.6% · Margin of error: 0.5% · With a disability: 57,040 · Without a disability: 434,419 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 491,459 · Total population: 499,287 · Total population (margin of error): 90Minneapolis, Minnesota · Disability rate: 11.6% · Margin of error: 0.4% · With a disability: 49,164 · Without a disability: 373,574 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 422,738 · Total population: 426,845 · Total population (margin of error): 69Cedar Rapids, Iowa · Disability rate: 11.6% · Margin of error: 0.7% · With a disability: 15,744 · Without a disability: 119,589 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 135,333 · Total population: 136,859 · Total population (margin of error): 60Oakland, California · Disability rate: 11.7% · Margin of error: 0.4% · With a disability: 50,941 · Without a disability: 384,952 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 435,893 · Total population: 438,072 · Total population (margin of error): 58New York, New York · Disability rate: 11.7% · Margin of error: 0.1% · With a disability: 988,779 · Without a disability: 7,471,467 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 8,460,246 · Total population: 8,516,202Lehigh Acres, Florida · Disability rate: 11.7% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 14,904 · Without a disability: 112,331 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 127,235 · Total population: 127,391 · Total population (margin of error): 3,339Virginia Beach, Virginia · Disability rate: 11.7% · Margin of error: 0.4% · With a disability: 50,682 · Without a disability: 381,734 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 432,416 · Total population: 457,066Hollywood, Florida · Disability rate: 11.7% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 17,800 · Without a disability: 133,918 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 151,718 · Total population: 152,935 · Total population (margin of error): 60Visalia, California · Disability rate: 11.7% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 16,653 · Without a disability: 125,075 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 141,728 · Total population: 142,649 · Total population (margin of error): 1,065New Haven, Connecticut · Disability rate: 11.8% · Margin of error: 0.9% · With a disability: 15,524 · Without a disability: 116,173 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 131,697 · Total population: 132,893 · Total population (margin of error): 76Greensboro, North Carolina · Disability rate: 11.8% · Margin of error: 0.5% · With a disability: 35,011 · Without a disability: 260,611 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 295,622 · Total population: 298,564 · Total population (margin of error): 102North Charleston, South Carolina · Disability rate: 11.9% · Margin of error: 0.9% · With a disability: 13,307 · Without a disability: 98,908 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 112,215 · Total population: 117,460 · Total population (margin of error): 80Lancaster, California · Disability rate: 11.9% · Margin of error: 0.7% · With a disability: 19,663 · Without a disability: 146,100 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 165,763 · Total population: 170,013 · Total population (margin of error): 62Columbia, Missouri · Disability rate: 11.9% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 14,984 · Without a disability: 111,047 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 126,031 · Total population: 127,200 · Total population (margin of error): 64West Covina, California · Disability rate: 11.9% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 12,730 · Without a disability: 94,242 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 106,972 · Total population: 107,436 · Total population (margin of error): 76Chicago, Illinois · Disability rate: 11.9% · Margin of error: 0.2% · With a disability: 319,716 · Without a disability: 2,364,194 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 2,683,910 · Total population: 2,707,648 · Total population (margin of error): 72Tampa, Florida · Disability rate: 11.9% · Margin of error: 0.4% · With a disability: 46,350 · Without a disability: 342,355 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 388,705 · Total population: 393,389 · Total population (margin of error): 134Grand Rapids, Michigan · Disability rate: 11.9% · Margin of error: 0.7% · With a disability: 23,220 · Without a disability: 171,221 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 194,441 · Total population: 197,768 · Total population (margin of error): 88Lincoln, Nebraska · Disability rate: 12.0% · Margin of error: 0.5% · With a disability: 34,584 · Without a disability: 252,789 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 287,373 · Total population: 291,932 · Total population (margin of error): 71El Monte, California · Disability rate: 12.1% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 12,804 · Without a disability: 93,416 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 106,220 · Total population: 107,066 · Total population (margin of error): 113Vacaville, California · Disability rate: 12.1% · Margin of error: 0.9% · With a disability: 11,382 · Without a disability: 82,976 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 94,358 · Total population: 102,085 · Total population (margin of error): 63Salt Lake City, Utah · Disability rate: 12.1% · Margin of error: 0.7% · With a disability: 24,496 · Without a disability: 178,183 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 202,679 · Total population: 203,888 · Total population (margin of error): 77Pasadena, Texas · Disability rate: 12.1% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 17,970 · Without a disability: 130,447 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 148,417 · Total population: 149,345 · Total population (margin of error): 59Boston, Massachusetts · Disability rate: 12.1% · Margin of error: 0.3% · With a disability: 79,915 · Without a disability: 579,861 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 659,776 · Total population: 663,972 · Total population (margin of error): 76Boise City, Idaho · Disability rate: 12.1% · Margin of error: 0.6% · With a disability: 28,268 · Without a disability: 204,846 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 233,114 · Total population: 235,701 · Total population (margin of error): 54Denton, Texas · Disability rate: 12.1% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 17,613 · Without a disability: 127,626 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 145,239 · Total population: 146,987 · Total population (margin of error): 68Reno, Nevada · Disability rate: 12.1% · Margin of error: 0.5% · With a disability: 32,309 · Without a disability: 234,038 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 266,347 · Total population: 268,959 · Total population (margin of error): 101Spring Valley, Nevada · Disability rate: 12.2% · Margin of error: 0.6% · With a disability: 26,700 · Without a disability: 192,977 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 219,677 · Total population: 219,913 · Total population (margin of error): 5,139Oceanside, California · Disability rate: 12.2% · Margin of error: 0.6% · With a disability: 20,592 · Without a disability: 147,911 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 168,503 · Total population: 172,542 · Total population (margin of error): 76Anchorage, Alaska · Disability rate: 12.2% · Margin of error: 0.4% · With a disability: 33,792 · Without a disability: 242,722 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 276,514 · Total population: 289,069Mesquite, Texas · Disability rate: 12.2% · Margin of error: 0.9% · With a disability: 18,148 · Without a disability: 130,128 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 148,276 · Total population: 148,848 · Total population (margin of error): 473Columbus, Ohio · Disability rate: 12.2% · Margin of error: 0.3% · With a disability: 110,250 · Without a disability: 790,333 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 900,583 · Total population: 906,480 · Total population (margin of error): 134Athens-Clarke County unified government (balance), Georgia · Disability rate: 12.2% · Margin of error: 0.9% · With a disability: 15,436 · Without a disability: 110,645 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 126,081 · Total population: 126,987 · Total population (margin of error): 688Brandon, Florida · Disability rate: 12.3% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 13,983 · Without a disability: 99,495 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 113,478 · Total population: 116,365 · Total population (margin of error): 3,137Sacramento, California · Disability rate: 12.4% · Margin of error: 0.4% · With a disability: 64,317 · Without a disability: 456,311 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 520,628 · Total population: 524,802 · Total population (margin of error): 252Fort Lauderdale, Florida · Disability rate: 12.4% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 22,370 · Without a disability: 158,678 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 181,048 · Total population: 183,032 · Total population (margin of error): 56Dearborn, Michigan · Disability rate: 12.4% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 13,298 · Without a disability: 94,315 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 107,613 · Total population: 107,846 · Total population (margin of error): 57Tyler, Texas · Disability rate: 12.4% · Margin of error: 0.9% · With a disability: 13,060 · Without a disability: 92,533 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 105,593 · Total population: 107,718 · Total population (margin of error): 63Mobile, Alabama · Disability rate: 12.4% · Margin of error: 0.6% · With a disability: 22,534 · Without a disability: 159,469 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 182,003 · Total population: 185,097 · Total population (margin of error): 52North Las Vegas, Nevada · Disability rate: 12.4% · Margin of error: 0.5% · With a disability: 33,086 · Without a disability: 233,354 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 266,440 · Total population: 270,773 · Total population (margin of error): 64Henderson, Nevada · Disability rate: 12.4% · Margin of error: 0.5% · With a disability: 40,102 · Without a disability: 282,483 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 322,585 · Total population: 324,523 · Total population (margin of error): 51Chesapeake, Virginia · Disability rate: 12.5% · Margin of error: 0.6% · With a disability: 29,833 · Without a disability: 209,340 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 239,173 · Total population: 251,153St. Paul, Minnesota · Disability rate: 12.5% · Margin of error: 0.5% · With a disability: 38,075 · Without a disability: 267,118 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 305,193 · Total population: 307,762 · Total population (margin of error): 48Concord, California · Disability rate: 12.5% · Margin of error: 0.9% · With a disability: 15,450 · Without a disability: 108,059 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 123,509 · Total population: 124,260 · Total population (margin of error): 42Urban Honolulu, Hawaii · Disability rate: 12.5% · Margin of error: 0.4% · With a disability: 41,918 · Without a disability: 292,580 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 334,498 · Total population: 346,323 · Total population (margin of error): 116Winston-Salem, North Carolina · Disability rate: 12.6% · Margin of error: 0.6% · With a disability: 31,398 · Without a disability: 216,975 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 248,373 · Total population: 250,887 · Total population (margin of error): 68Waco, Texas · Disability rate: 12.7% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 17,604 · Without a disability: 121,455 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 139,059 · Total population: 141,925 · Total population (margin of error): 137Lakewood, Colorado · Disability rate: 12.7% · Margin of error: 0.7% · With a disability: 19,590 · Without a disability: 135,061 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 154,651 · Total population: 156,309 · Total population (margin of error): 154Columbia, South Carolina · Disability rate: 12.7% · Margin of error: 0.9% · With a disability: 15,355 · Without a disability: 105,829 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 121,184 · Total population: 138,019 · Total population (margin of error): 187Escondido, California · Disability rate: 12.7% · Margin of error: 0.9% · With a disability: 18,833 · Without a disability: 129,713 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 148,546 · Total population: 149,913 · Total population (margin of error): 83Santa Rosa, California · Disability rate: 12.7% · Margin of error: 0.7% · With a disability: 22,312 · Without a disability: 153,158 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 175,470 · Total population: 177,216 · Total population (margin of error): 54Surprise, Arizona · Disability rate: 12.7% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 18,873 · Without a disability: 129,282 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 148,155 · Total population: 149,519 · Total population (margin of error): 64Lexington-Fayette urban county, Kentucky · Disability rate: 12.8% · Margin of error: 0.5% · With a disability: 40,387 · Without a disability: 276,304 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 316,691 · Total population: 321,122Fairfield, California · Disability rate: 12.8% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 14,958 · Without a disability: 102,163 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 117,121 · Total population: 119,985 · Total population (margin of error): 50San Bernardino, California · Disability rate: 12.8% · Margin of error: 0.7% · With a disability: 27,678 · Without a disability: 188,462 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 216,140 · Total population: 221,774 · Total population (margin of error): 88Glendale, California · Disability rate: 12.8% · Margin of error: 0.7% · With a disability: 24,453 · Without a disability: 166,473 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 190,926 · Total population: 192,270 · Total population (margin of error): 67Kansas City, Missouri · Disability rate: 12.8% · Margin of error: 0.4% · With a disability: 64,576 · Without a disability: 439,412 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 503,988 · Total population: 508,233 · Total population (margin of error): 121Greeley, Colorado · Disability rate: 12.8% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 13,817 · Without a disability: 93,967 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 107,784 · Total population: 109,421 · Total population (margin of error): 62Lafayette, Louisiana · Disability rate: 12.9% · Margin of error: 1.0% · With a disability: 15,453 · Without a disability: 104,491 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 119,944 · Total population: 121,537 · Total population (margin of error): 75Vallejo, California · Disability rate: 12.9% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 15,951 · Without a disability: 107,856 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 123,807 · Total population: 124,637 · Total population (margin of error): 70Hesperia, California · Disability rate: 12.9% · Margin of error: 1.0% · With a disability: 12,897 · Without a disability: 87,149 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 100,046 · Total population: 100,141 · Total population (margin of error): 44St. Petersburg, Florida · Disability rate: 12.9% · Margin of error: 0.6% · With a disability: 33,089 · Without a disability: 223,490 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 256,579 · Total population: 260,646 · Total population (margin of error): 54High Point, North Carolina · Disability rate: 12.9% · Margin of error: 0.9% · With a disability: 14,722 · Without a disability: 99,346 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 114,068 · Total population: 115,263 · Total population (margin of error): 63Wilmington, North Carolina · Disability rate: 12.9% · Margin of error: 0.9% · With a disability: 15,228 · Without a disability: 102,586 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 117,814 · Total population: 118,578 · Total population (margin of error): 53Miami Gardens, Florida · Disability rate: 12.9% · Margin of error: 1.1% · With a disability: 14,375 · Without a disability: 96,780 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 111,155 · Total population: 111,264 · Total population (margin of error): 111Mesa, Arizona · Disability rate: 13.0% · Margin of error: 0.4% · With a disability: 65,355 · Without a disability: 439,184 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 504,539 · Total population: 507,478 · Total population (margin of error): 87Amarillo, Texas · Disability rate: 13.0% · Margin of error: 0.6% · With a disability: 25,840 · Without a disability: 173,214 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 199,054 · Total population: 200,945 · Total population (margin of error): 43Lubbock, Texas · Disability rate: 13.0% · Margin of error: 0.5% · With a disability: 33,472 · Without a disability: 224,314 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 257,786 · Total population: 261,078 · Total population (margin of error): 49McAllen, Texas · Disability rate: 13.0% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 18,558 · Without a disability: 124,262 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 142,820 · Total population: 143,789 · Total population (margin of error): 56Sparks, Nevada · Disability rate: 13.0% · Margin of error: 0.9% · With a disability: 14,125 · Without a disability: 94,560 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 108,685 · Total population: 109,106 · Total population (margin of error): 75Hialeah, Florida · Disability rate: 13.1% · Margin of error: 0.7% · With a disability: 28,985 · Without a disability: 191,860 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 220,845 · Total population: 221,901 · Total population (margin of error): 67Portland, Oregon · Disability rate: 13.2% · Margin of error: 0.4% · With a disability: 83,926 · Without a disability: 554,043 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 637,969 · Total population: 642,715 · Total population (margin of error): 699Milwaukee, Wisconsin · Disability rate: 13.2% · Margin of error: 0.4% · With a disability: 74,408 · Without a disability: 491,190 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 565,598 · Total population: 569,756 · Total population (margin of error): 49Colorado Springs, Colorado · Disability rate: 13.2% · Margin of error: 0.4% · With a disability: 61,400 · Without a disability: 404,928 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 466,328 · Total population: 483,099 · Total population (margin of error): 79San Tan Valley, Arizona · Disability rate: 13.2% · Margin of error: 1.1% · With a disability: 13,875 · Without a disability: 91,221 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 105,096 · Total population: 105,231 · Total population (margin of error): 2,932Laredo, Texas · Disability rate: 13.2% · Margin of error: 0.6% · With a disability: 33,599 · Without a disability: 220,659 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 254,258 · Total population: 255,949 · Total population (margin of error): 41Las Vegas, Nevada · Disability rate: 13.3% · Margin of error: 0.4% · With a disability: 85,350 · Without a disability: 556,258 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 641,608 · Total population: 650,873 · Total population (margin of error): 108Peoria, Arizona · Disability rate: 13.3% · Margin of error: 0.9% · With a disability: 25,663 · Without a disability: 166,970 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 192,633 · Total population: 194,338 · Total population (margin of error): 207San Buenaventura (Ventura), California · Disability rate: 13.4% · Margin of error: 0.9% · With a disability: 14,510 · Without a disability: 93,981 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 108,491 · Total population: 109,900 · Total population (margin of error): 62Corpus Christi, Texas · Disability rate: 13.4% · Margin of error: 0.5% · With a disability: 41,760 · Without a disability: 269,736 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 311,496 · Total population: 317,383 · Total population (margin of error): 78Jacksonville, Florida · Disability rate: 13.5% · Margin of error: 0.3% · With a disability: 126,516 · Without a disability: 811,199 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 937,715 · Total population: 961,739 · Total population (margin of error): 52Indianapolis city (balance), Indiana · Disability rate: 13.5% · Margin of error: 0.3% · With a disability: 117,960 · Without a disability: 755,415 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 873,375 · Total population: 882,043 · Total population (margin of error): 878Pompano Beach, Florida · Disability rate: 13.6% · Margin of error: 1.0% · With a disability: 14,832 · Without a disability: 94,594 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 109,426 · Total population: 112,212 · Total population (margin of error): 80Brockton, Massachusetts · Disability rate: 13.6% · Margin of error: 0.9% · With a disability: 14,103 · Without a disability: 89,940 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 104,043 · Total population: 105,080 · Total population (margin of error): 50Lynn, Massachusetts · Disability rate: 13.6% · Margin of error: 1.1% · With a disability: 13,651 · Without a disability: 87,022 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 100,673 · Total population: 100,905 · Total population (margin of error): 83Sterling Heights, Michigan · Disability rate: 13.6% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 18,029 · Without a disability: 114,765 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 132,794 · Total population: 133,473 · Total population (margin of error): 73Modesto, California · Disability rate: 13.6% · Margin of error: 0.7% · With a disability: 29,527 · Without a disability: 187,762 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 217,289 · Total population: 218,614 · Total population (margin of error): 91Memphis, Tennessee · Disability rate: 13.6% · Margin of error: 0.4% · With a disability: 84,370 · Without a disability: 535,588 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 619,958 · Total population: 629,063 · Total population (margin of error): 84Fort Wayne, Indiana · Disability rate: 13.6% · Margin of error: 0.5% · With a disability: 35,887 · Without a disability: 227,484 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 263,371 · Total population: 266,235 · Total population (margin of error): 395Manchester, New Hampshire · Disability rate: 13.6% · Margin of error: 1.0% · With a disability: 15,494 · Without a disability: 98,201 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 113,695 · Total population: 115,415 · Total population (margin of error): 61Cincinnati, Ohio · Disability rate: 13.6% · Margin of error: 0.6% · With a disability: 41,565 · Without a disability: 263,334 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 304,899 · Total population: 309,595 · Total population (margin of error): 63Providence, Rhode Island · Disability rate: 13.7% · Margin of error: 0.9% · With a disability: 25,761 · Without a disability: 161,859 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 187,620 · Total population: 190,214 · Total population (margin of error): 61Menifee, California · Disability rate: 13.8% · Margin of error: 1.2% · With a disability: 14,666 · Without a disability: 91,650 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 106,316 · Total population: 107,020 · Total population (margin of error): 63Davenport, Iowa · Disability rate: 13.9% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 13,854 · Without a disability: 85,920 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 99,774 · Total population: 101,083 · Total population (margin of error): 34Oklahoma City, Oklahoma · Disability rate: 13.9% · Margin of error: 0.3% · With a disability: 94,116 · Without a disability: 583,333 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 677,449 · Total population: 688,693 · Total population (margin of error): 148Kansas City, Kansas · Disability rate: 13.9% · Margin of error: 0.7% · With a disability: 21,353 · Without a disability: 132,272 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 153,625 · Total population: 154,776 · Total population (margin of error): 26Little Rock, Arkansas · Disability rate: 13.9% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 27,891 · Without a disability: 172,278 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 200,169 · Total population: 202,739 · Total population (margin of error): 78Richmond, Virginia · Disability rate: 14.0% · Margin of error: 0.7% · With a disability: 31,455 · Without a disability: 193,708 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 225,163 · Total population: 227,595Cape Coral, Florida · Disability rate: 14.0% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 28,817 · Without a disability: 176,773 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 205,590 · Total population: 206,387 · Total population (margin of error): 42Knoxville, Tennessee · Disability rate: 14.1% · Margin of error: 0.7% · With a disability: 26,992 · Without a disability: 165,115 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 192,107 · Total population: 193,721 · Total population (margin of error): 80New Orleans, Louisiana · Disability rate: 14.1% · Margin of error: 0.4% · With a disability: 52,249 · Without a disability: 319,300 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 371,549 · Total population: 376,035Yonkers, New York · Disability rate: 14.1% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 29,405 · Without a disability: 179,298 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 208,703 · Total population: 209,529 · Total population (margin of error): 81Rio Rancho, New Mexico · Disability rate: 14.1% · Margin of error: 0.9% · With a disability: 14,957 · Without a disability: 91,066 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 106,023 · Total population: 106,533 · Total population (margin of error): 72Abilene, Texas · Disability rate: 14.1% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 16,231 · Without a disability: 98,783 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 115,014 · Total population: 127,130 · Total population (margin of error): 262Port St. Lucie, Florida · Disability rate: 14.1% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 30,994 · Without a disability: 188,596 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 219,590 · Total population: 220,453 · Total population (margin of error): 73Stockton, California · Disability rate: 14.2% · Margin of error: 0.5% · With a disability: 45,137 · Without a disability: 273,364 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 318,501 · Total population: 320,470 · Total population (margin of error): 131Wichita Falls, Texas · Disability rate: 14.2% · Margin of error: 0.9% · With a disability: 12,947 · Without a disability: 78,352 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 91,299 · Total population: 102,558 · Total population (margin of error): 39Inglewood, California · Disability rate: 14.2% · Margin of error: 1.0% · With a disability: 14,916 · Without a disability: 90,034 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 104,950 · Total population: 105,575 · Total population (margin of error): 57Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania · Disability rate: 14.2% · Margin of error: 0.5% · With a disability: 42,546 · Without a disability: 256,676 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 299,222 · Total population: 303,620 · Total population (margin of error): 57Fresno, California · Disability rate: 14.2% · Margin of error: 0.4% · With a disability: 76,596 · Without a disability: 461,456 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 538,052 · Total population: 543,615 · Total population (margin of error): 107El Paso, Texas · Disability rate: 14.3% · Margin of error: 0.4% · With a disability: 94,513 · Without a disability: 567,916 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 662,429 · Total population: 678,147 · Total population (margin of error): 153Des Moines, Iowa · Disability rate: 14.3% · Margin of error: 0.6% · With a disability: 30,097 · Without a disability: 180,776 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 210,873 · Total population: 212,464 · Total population (margin of error): 185Huntsville, Alabama · Disability rate: 14.3% · Margin of error: 0.7% · With a disability: 30,740 · Without a disability: 184,174 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 214,914 · Total population: 218,814 · Total population (margin of error): 61Metairie, Louisiana · Disability rate: 14.4% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 19,865 · Without a disability: 118,542 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 138,407 · Total population: 138,995 · Total population (margin of error): 3,016Norman, Oklahoma · Disability rate: 14.4% · Margin of error: 0.9% · With a disability: 18,332 · Without a disability: 108,740 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 127,072 · Total population: 128,714 · Total population (margin of error): 76Tulsa, Oklahoma · Disability rate: 14.4% · Margin of error: 0.4% · With a disability: 58,887 · Without a disability: 349,186 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 408,073 · Total population: 412,322 · Total population (margin of error): 129Chico, California · Disability rate: 14.5% · Margin of error: 1.0% · With a disability: 14,693 · Without a disability: 86,578 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 101,271 · Total population: 102,032 · Total population (margin of error): 57Chattanooga, Tennessee · Disability rate: 14.5% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 26,125 · Without a disability: 153,831 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 179,956 · Total population: 182,832 · Total population (margin of error): 79Billings, Montana · Disability rate: 14.5% · Margin of error: 0.9% · With a disability: 16,927 · Without a disability: 99,431 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 116,358 · Total population: 118,321 · Total population (margin of error): 43Newport News, Virginia · Disability rate: 14.6% · Margin of error: 0.7% · With a disability: 25,448 · Without a disability: 149,219 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 174,667 · Total population: 184,774Peoria, Illinois · Disability rate: 14.6% · Margin of error: 0.9% · With a disability: 16,194 · Without a disability: 94,632 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 110,826 · Total population: 112,126 · Total population (margin of error): 429Beaumont, Texas · Disability rate: 14.6% · Margin of error: 0.9% · With a disability: 16,463 · Without a disability: 95,963 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 112,426 · Total population: 113,710 · Total population (margin of error): 63Paradise, Nevada · Disability rate: 14.7% · Margin of error: 0.6% · With a disability: 27,226 · Without a disability: 158,299 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 185,525 · Total population: 186,178 · Total population (margin of error): 4,601South Bend, Indiana · Disability rate: 14.7% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 14,876 · Without a disability: 86,458 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 101,334 · Total population: 102,866 · Total population (margin of error): 612Las Cruces, New Mexico · Disability rate: 14.7% · Margin of error: 1.0% · With a disability: 16,379 · Without a disability: 94,943 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 111,322 · Total population: 112,612 · Total population (margin of error): 86Worcester, Massachusetts · Disability rate: 14.7% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 29,972 · Without a disability: 173,381 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 203,353 · Total population: 205,501 · Total population (margin of error): 74Louisville/Jefferson County metro government (balance), Kentucky · Disability rate: 14.7% · Margin of error: 0.4% · With a disability: 91,424 · Without a disability: 528,827 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 620,251 · Total population: 627,210 · Total population (margin of error): 145Norfolk, Virginia · Disability rate: 14.8% · Margin of error: 0.6% · With a disability: 30,749 · Without a disability: 177,549 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 208,298 · Total population: 235,037Antioch, California · Disability rate: 14.8% · Margin of error: 1.2% · With a disability: 17,085 · Without a disability: 98,366 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 115,451 · Total population: 115,759 · Total population (margin of error): 110Clarksville, Tennessee · Disability rate: 14.8% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 23,573 · Without a disability: 135,632 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 159,205 · Total population: 171,897 · Total population (margin of error): 51Lowell, Massachusetts · Disability rate: 14.8% · Margin of error: 1.0% · With a disability: 16,873 · Without a disability: 96,965 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 113,838 · Total population: 114,799 · Total population (margin of error): 46Victorville, California · Disability rate: 14.8% · Margin of error: 1.0% · With a disability: 19,498 · Without a disability: 111,986 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 131,484 · Total population: 135,983 · Total population (margin of error): 80Clearwater, Florida · Disability rate: 14.9% · Margin of error: 1.0% · With a disability: 17,151 · Without a disability: 98,247 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 115,398 · Total population: 117,075 · Total population (margin of error): 58Springfield, Illinois · Disability rate: 14.9% · Margin of error: 0.9% · With a disability: 16,686 · Without a disability: 95,492 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 112,178 · Total population: 113,714 · Total population (margin of error): 376Wichita, Kansas · Disability rate: 14.9% · Margin of error: 0.5% · With a disability: 58,201 · Without a disability: 332,596 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 390,797 · Total population: 396,488 · Total population (margin of error): 82El Cajon, California · Disability rate: 14.9% · Margin of error: 1.1% · With a disability: 15,384 · Without a disability: 87,529 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 102,913 · Total population: 104,909 · Total population (margin of error): 94Sunrise Manor, Nevada · Disability rate: 15.0% · Margin of error: 0.7% · With a disability: 29,842 · Without a disability: 168,864 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 198,706 · Total population: 199,099 · Total population (margin of error): 3,940Green Bay, Wisconsin · Disability rate: 15.0% · Margin of error: 1.0% · With a disability: 15,886 · Without a disability: 89,797 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 105,683 · Total population: 106,585 · Total population (margin of error): 91Eugene, Oregon · Disability rate: 15.1% · Margin of error: 0.7% · With a disability: 26,590 · Without a disability: 149,766 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 176,356 · Total population: 177,520 · Total population (margin of error): 70Albany, New York · Disability rate: 15.1% · Margin of error: 1.0% · With a disability: 14,939 · Without a disability: 83,874 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 98,813 · Total population: 100,081 · Total population (margin of error): 48Tacoma, Washington · Disability rate: 15.1% · Margin of error: 0.7% · With a disability: 32,612 · Without a disability: 183,021 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 215,633 · Total population: 220,482 · Total population (margin of error): 73Vancouver, Washington · Disability rate: 15.1% · Margin of error: 0.7% · With a disability: 28,940 · Without a disability: 162,118 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 191,058 · Total population: 192,696 · Total population (margin of error): 110Warren, Michigan · Disability rate: 15.2% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 20,783 · Without a disability: 116,306 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 137,089 · Total population: 138,128 · Total population (margin of error): 56Jackson, Mississippi · Disability rate: 15.2% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 22,556 · Without a disability: 125,851 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 148,407 · Total population: 149,827 · Total population (margin of error): 70Albuquerque, New Mexico · Disability rate: 15.2% · Margin of error: 0.4% · With a disability: 84,891 · Without a disability: 472,780 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 557,671 · Total population: 562,488 · Total population (margin of error): 118Hartford, Connecticut · Disability rate: 15.2% · Margin of error: 1.0% · With a disability: 17,969 · Without a disability: 99,979 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 117,948 · Total population: 119,970 · Total population (margin of error): 53Killeen, Texas · Disability rate: 15.2% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 22,065 · Without a disability: 122,637 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 144,702 · Total population: 156,144 · Total population (margin of error): 60Nampa, Idaho · Disability rate: 15.3% · Margin of error: 1.1% · With a disability: 16,079 · Without a disability: 89,219 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 105,298 · Total population: 106,289 · Total population (margin of error): 52Salem, Oregon · Disability rate: 15.4% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 26,297 · Without a disability: 145,017 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 171,314 · Total population: 176,666 · Total population (margin of error): 96San Antonio, Texas · Disability rate: 15.5% · Margin of error: 0.3% · With a disability: 222,693 · Without a disability: 1,212,683 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 1,435,376 · Total population: 1,458,954 · Total population (margin of error): 118Tucson, Arizona · Disability rate: 15.5% · Margin of error: 0.4% · With a disability: 81,568 · Without a disability: 444,146 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 525,714 · Total population: 543,348 · Total population (margin of error): 98Lakeland, Florida · Disability rate: 15.6% · Margin of error: 1.0% · With a disability: 17,948 · Without a disability: 97,282 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 115,230 · Total population: 117,030 · Total population (margin of error): 64Glendale, Arizona · Disability rate: 15.8% · Margin of error: 0.7% · With a disability: 38,937 · Without a disability: 208,078 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 247,015 · Total population: 250,193 · Total population (margin of error): 86Macon-Bibb County, Georgia · Disability rate: 15.8% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 24,183 · Without a disability: 128,948 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 153,131 · Total population: 156,543Everett, Washington · Disability rate: 15.8% · Margin of error: 0.9% · With a disability: 17,113 · Without a disability: 91,035 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 108,148 · Total population: 111,083 · Total population (margin of error): 80Savannah, Georgia · Disability rate: 15.9% · Margin of error: 0.9% · With a disability: 22,577 · Without a disability: 119,010 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 141,587 · Total population: 147,546 · Total population (margin of error): 85New Bedford, Massachusetts · Disability rate: 16.1% · Margin of error: 1.0% · With a disability: 15,994 · Without a disability: 83,627 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 99,621 · Total population: 100,731 · Total population (margin of error): 62Montgomery, Alabama · Disability rate: 16.1% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 31,182 · Without a disability: 162,204 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 193,386 · Total population: 198,440 · Total population (margin of error): 40Fayetteville, North Carolina · Disability rate: 16.2% · Margin of error: 0.6% · With a disability: 29,170 · Without a disability: 151,068 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 180,238 · Total population: 209,692 · Total population (margin of error): 87Allentown, Pennsylvania · Disability rate: 16.2% · Margin of error: 1.0% · With a disability: 20,036 · Without a disability: 103,363 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 123,399 · Total population: 125,320 · Total population (margin of error): 53Hampton, Virginia · Disability rate: 16.3% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 21,241 · Without a disability: 109,098 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 130,339 · Total population: 137,334Palm Bay, Florida · Disability rate: 16.3% · Margin of error: 1.1% · With a disability: 20,279 · Without a disability: 103,973 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 124,252 · Total population: 125,273 · Total population (margin of error): 104Akron, Ohio · Disability rate: 16.3% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 30,656 · Without a disability: 157,101 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 187,757 · Total population: 189,526 · Total population (margin of error): 76Baton Rouge, Louisiana · Disability rate: 16.3% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 36,194 · Without a disability: 185,312 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 221,506 · Total population: 223,699 · Total population (margin of error): 58Independence, Missouri · Disability rate: 16.4% · Margin of error: 0.9% · With a disability: 19,795 · Without a disability: 101,007 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 120,802 · Total population: 121,944 · Total population (margin of error): 74Topeka, Kansas · Disability rate: 16.4% · Margin of error: 0.9% · With a disability: 20,169 · Without a disability: 102,813 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 122,982 · Total population: 126,103 · Total population (margin of error): 43Buffalo, New York · Disability rate: 16.5% · Margin of error: 0.7% · With a disability: 45,184 · Without a disability: 229,472 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 274,656 · Total population: 276,397 · Total population (margin of error): 65Baltimore, Maryland · Disability rate: 16.5% · Margin of error: 0.4% · With a disability: 93,856 · Without a disability: 475,791 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 569,647 · Total population: 577,193St. Louis, Missouri · Disability rate: 16.6% · Margin of error: 0.6% · With a disability: 47,879 · Without a disability: 241,326 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 289,205 · Total population: 293,109Syracuse, New York · Disability rate: 16.6% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 23,911 · Without a disability: 119,828 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 143,739 · Total population: 146,211 · Total population (margin of error): 65Lansing, Michigan · Disability rate: 16.6% · Margin of error: 1.0% · With a disability: 18,691 · Without a disability: 93,656 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 112,347 · Total population: 112,546 · Total population (margin of error): 66Newark, New Jersey · Disability rate: 16.7% · Margin of error: 0.7% · With a disability: 49,938 · Without a disability: 249,805 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 299,743 · Total population: 307,188 · Total population (margin of error): 49Rockford, Illinois · Disability rate: 16.7% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 24,201 · Without a disability: 120,827 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 145,028 · Total population: 147,649 · Total population (margin of error): 300Gresham, Oregon · Disability rate: 16.7% · Margin of error: 1.1% · With a disability: 18,727 · Without a disability: 93,447 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 112,174 · Total population: 112,818 · Total population (margin of error): 58Bridgeport, Connecticut · Disability rate: 16.7% · Margin of error: 0.9% · With a disability: 24,502 · Without a disability: 122,164 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 146,666 · Total population: 148,012 · Total population (margin of error): 100Springfield, Missouri · Disability rate: 16.8% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 27,969 · Without a disability: 138,322 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 166,291 · Total population: 169,432 · Total population (margin of error): 92Spokane, Washington · Disability rate: 16.9% · Margin of error: 0.7% · With a disability: 38,310 · Without a disability: 187,939 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 226,249 · Total population: 229,228 · Total population (margin of error): 74Toledo, Ohio · Disability rate: 17.3% · Margin of error: 0.6% · With a disability: 46,035 · Without a disability: 219,795 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 265,830 · Total population: 268,461 · Total population (margin of error): 64Columbus, Georgia · Disability rate: 17.4% · Margin of error: 0.8% · With a disability: 33,888 · Without a disability: 160,913 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 194,801 · Total population: 204,383Philadelphia, Pennsylvania · Disability rate: 17.4% · Margin of error: 0.3% · With a disability: 273,685 · Without a disability: 1,296,417 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 1,570,102 · Total population: 1,582,432Spokane Valley, Washington · Disability rate: 17.7% · Margin of error: 1.2% · With a disability: 18,530 · Without a disability: 86,106 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 104,636 · Total population: 105,460 · Total population (margin of error): 71Shreveport, Louisiana · Disability rate: 17.8% · Margin of error: 0.9% · With a disability: 31,831 · Without a disability: 146,751 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 178,582 · Total population: 183,483 · Total population (margin of error): 60Birmingham, Alabama · Disability rate: 18.2% · Margin of error: 0.9% · With a disability: 35,660 · Without a disability: 160,323 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 195,983 · Total population: 199,322 · Total population (margin of error): 646Springfield, Massachusetts · Disability rate: 18.3% · Margin of error: 0.9% · With a disability: 28,201 · Without a disability: 125,863 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 154,064 · Total population: 154,751 · Total population (margin of error): 91Spring Hill, Florida · Disability rate: 18.5% · Margin of error: 0.9% · With a disability: 21,749 · Without a disability: 95,644 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 117,393 · Total population: 118,814 · Total population (margin of error): 2,310Waterbury, Connecticut · Disability rate: 18.6% · Margin of error: 1.1% · With a disability: 21,152 · Without a disability: 92,350 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 113,502 · Total population: 114,356 · Total population (margin of error): 39Evansville, Indiana · Disability rate: 18.6% · Margin of error: 0.9% · With a disability: 21,304 · Without a disability: 92,943 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 114,247 · Total population: 116,441 · Total population (margin of error): 34Dayton, Ohio · Disability rate: 18.7% · Margin of error: 1.0% · With a disability: 25,085 · Without a disability: 108,787 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 133,872 · Total population: 136,741 · Total population (margin of error): 70Augusta-Richmond County consolidated government (balance), Georgia · Disability rate: 19.0% · Margin of error: 0.9% · With a disability: 36,156 · Without a disability: 153,732 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 189,888 · Total population: 201,504 · Total population (margin of error): 20Rochester, New York · Disability rate: 19.1% · Margin of error: 0.7% · With a disability: 39,442 · Without a disability: 167,490 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 206,932 · Total population: 209,720 · Total population (margin of error): 114Pueblo, Colorado · Disability rate: 19.4% · Margin of error: 1.0% · With a disability: 20,930 · Without a disability: 86,772 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 107,702 · Total population: 111,514 · Total population (margin of error): 51Detroit, Michigan · Disability rate: 19.6% · Margin of error: 0.4% · With a disability: 123,795 · Without a disability: 507,829 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 631,624 · Total population: 636,644 · Total population (margin of error): 159Cleveland, Ohio · Disability rate: 19.9% · Margin of error: 0.6% · With a disability: 71,950 · Without a disability: 290,107 · Civilian noninstitutionalized population: 362,057 · Total population: 367,523 · Total population (margin of error): 61New YorkLos AngelesChicagoHoustonPhoenixSan FranciscoSeattleDenverDallasAtlantaMiamiBostonMinneapolisDetroitNew OrleansWashingtonPortlandLas VegasSalt Lake CityKansas CityJacksonvilleCharlotteAnchorageUrban HonoluluDisability rate6.1%25.3%
Summary

Darker amber is a higher share of the civilian noninstitutionalized population with a disability. Each city is a marked point on the US state map. Alaska and Hawaii are inset. Puerto Rico cities are in the ranking and table but are not drawn here.

Among the 346 US cities with at least 100,000 residents, a typical city has a disability rate of 12.1%, the midpoint so half of these cities sit above that share and half sit below. Ponce, Puerto Rico has the highest rate at 25.3%. Irvine, California has the lowest at 6.1%. 61 of these cities are at or above 15%. These are each city's own share of the civilian noninstitutionalized population with a disability from the 2023 ACS five-year estimates, not a United States disability rate.

In short

12.1%typical citydisability rate, the middle city, not a US rate
25.3%Ponce, Puerto Ricohighest disability rate
6.1%Irvine, Californialowest disability rate
61cities at or above 15%of 346 cities with 100,000 or more people
19.2 ptsspread, high to lowPonce, Puerto Rico minus Irvine, California
Figure 1

Disability rate, all published cities

Disability rate · all 346 · ranked high to low

346 items
View100%
DownloadPDFImageCSV
Disability rate, all published citiesEvery included city with at least 100,000 residents, 346 in all. Ponce, Puerto Rico leads at 25.3%. Irvine, California is lowest at 6.1%. The middle city sits at 12.1%. The ranking is each city's own disability rate for the civilian noninstitutionalized population.0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%Disability rate, percent25.3%Ponce, Puerto Rico22.8%Bayamón, Puerto Rico20.7%San Juan, Puerto Rico19.9%Cleveland, Ohio19.6%Detroit, Michigan19.4%Pueblo, Colorado19.3%Carolina, Puerto Rico19.1%Rochester, New York19.0%Augusta-Richmond County con…18.7%Dayton, Ohio18.6%Evansville, Indiana18.6%Waterbury, Connecticut18.5%Spring Hill, Florida18.3%Springfield, Massachusetts18.2%Birmingham, Alabama17.8%Shreveport, Louisiana17.7%Spokane Valley, Washington17.4%Philadelphia, Pennsylvania17.4%Columbus, Georgia17.3%Toledo, Ohio16.9%Spokane, Washington16.8%Springfield, Missouri16.7%Bridgeport, Connecticut16.7%Gresham, Oregon16.7%Rockford, Illinois16.7%Newark, New Jersey16.6%Lansing, Michigan16.6%Syracuse, New York16.6%St. Louis, Missouri16.5%Baltimore, Maryland16.5%Buffalo, New York16.4%Topeka, Kansas16.4%Independence, Missouri16.3%Baton Rouge, Louisiana16.3%Akron, Ohio16.3%Palm Bay, Florida16.3%Hampton, Virginia16.2%Allentown, Pennsylvania16.2%Fayetteville, North Carolina16.1%Montgomery, Alabama16.1%New Bedford, Massachusetts15.9%Savannah, Georgia15.8%Everett, Washington15.8%Macon-Bibb County, Georgia15.8%Glendale, Arizona15.6%Lakeland, Florida15.5%Tucson, Arizona15.5%San Antonio, Texas15.4%Salem, Oregon15.3%Nampa, Idaho15.2%Killeen, Texas15.2%Hartford, Connecticut15.2%Albuquerque, New Mexico15.2%Jackson, Mississippi15.2%Warren, Michigan15.1%Vancouver, Washington15.1%Tacoma, Washington15.1%Albany, New York15.1%Eugene, Oregon15.0%Green Bay, Wisconsin15.0%Sunrise Manor, Nevada14.9%El Cajon, California14.9%Wichita, Kansas14.9%Springfield, Illinois14.9%Clearwater, Florida14.8%Victorville, California14.8%Lowell, Massachusetts14.8%Clarksville, Tennessee14.8%Antioch, California14.8%Norfolk, Virginia14.7%Louisville/Jefferson County…14.7%Worcester, Massachusetts14.7%Las Cruces, New Mexico14.7%South Bend, Indiana14.7%Paradise, Nevada14.6%Beaumont, Texas14.6%Peoria, Illinois14.6%Newport News, Virginia14.5%Billings, Montana14.5%Chattanooga, Tennessee14.5%Chico, California14.4%Tulsa, Oklahoma14.4%Norman, Oklahoma14.4%Metairie, Louisiana14.3%Huntsville, Alabama14.3%Des Moines, Iowa14.3%El Paso, Texas14.2%Fresno, California14.2%Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania14.2%Inglewood, California14.2%Wichita Falls, Texas14.2%Stockton, California14.1%Port St. Lucie, Florida14.1%Abilene, Texas14.1%Rio Rancho, New Mexico14.1%Yonkers, New York14.1%New Orleans, Louisiana14.1%Knoxville, Tennessee14.0%Cape Coral, Florida14.0%Richmond, Virginia13.9%Little Rock, Arkansas13.9%Kansas City, Kansas13.9%Oklahoma City, Oklahoma13.9%Davenport, Iowa13.8%Menifee, California13.7%Providence, Rhode Island13.6%Cincinnati, Ohio13.6%Manchester, New Hampshire13.6%Fort Wayne, Indiana13.6%Memphis, Tennessee13.6%Modesto, California13.6%Sterling Heights, Michigan13.6%Lynn, Massachusetts13.6%Brockton, Massachusetts13.6%Pompano Beach, Florida13.5%Indianapolis city (balance)…13.5%Jacksonville, Florida13.4%Corpus Christi, Texas13.4%San Buenaventura (Ventura),…13.3%Peoria, Arizona13.3%Las Vegas, Nevada13.2%Laredo, Texas13.2%San Tan Valley, Arizona13.2%Colorado Springs, Colorado13.2%Milwaukee, Wisconsin13.2%Portland, Oregon13.1%Hialeah, Florida13.0%Sparks, Nevada13.0%McAllen, Texas13.0%Lubbock, Texas13.0%Amarillo, Texas13.0%Mesa, Arizona12.9%Miami Gardens, Florida12.9%Wilmington, North Carolina12.9%High Point, North Carolina12.9%St. Petersburg, Florida12.9%Hesperia, California12.9%Vallejo, California12.9%Lafayette, Louisiana12.8%Greeley, Colorado12.8%Kansas City, Missouri12.8%Glendale, California12.8%San Bernardino, California12.8%Fairfield, California12.8%Lexington-Fayette urban cou…12.7%Surprise, Arizona12.7%Santa Rosa, California12.7%Escondido, California12.7%Columbia, South Carolina12.7%Lakewood, Colorado12.7%Waco, Texas12.6%Winston-Salem, North Caroli…12.5%Urban Honolulu, Hawaii12.5%Concord, California12.5%St. Paul, Minnesota12.5%Chesapeake, Virginia12.4%Henderson, Nevada12.4%North Las Vegas, Nevada12.4%Mobile, Alabama12.4%Tyler, Texas12.4%Dearborn, Michigan12.4%Fort Lauderdale, Florida12.4%Sacramento, California12.3%Brandon, Florida12.2%Athens-Clarke County unifie…12.2%Columbus, Ohio12.2%Mesquite, Texas12.2%Anchorage, Alaska12.2%Oceanside, California12.2%Spring Valley, Nevada12.1%Reno, Nevada12.1%Denton, Texas12.1%Boise City, Idaho12.1%Boston, Massachusetts12.1%Pasadena, Texas12.1%Salt Lake City, Utah12.1%Vacaville, California12.1%El Monte, California12.0%Lincoln, Nebraska11.9%Grand Rapids, Michigan11.9%Tampa, Florida11.9%Chicago, Illinois11.9%West Covina, California11.9%Columbia, Missouri11.9%Lancaster, California11.9%North Charleston, South Car…11.8%Greensboro, North Carolina11.8%New Haven, Connecticut11.7%Visalia, California11.7%Hollywood, Florida11.7%Virginia Beach, Virginia11.7%Lehigh Acres, Florida11.7%New York, New York11.7%Oakland, California11.6%Cedar Rapids, Iowa11.6%Minneapolis, Minnesota11.6%Atlanta, Georgia11.6%Aurora, Colorado11.6%Palmdale, California11.5%Burbank, California11.5%Broken Arrow, Oklahoma11.5%Hillsboro, Oregon11.5%Simi Valley, California11.5%Phoenix, Arizona11.5%Miami, Florida11.4%Tallahassee, Florida11.4%East Los Angeles, California11.4%Renton, Washington11.4%Long Beach, California11.4%Santa Maria, California11.4%West Palm Beach, Florida11.4%Fargo, North Dakota11.4%Dallas, Texas11.3%Roseville, California11.2%Pembroke Pines, Florida11.2%San Francisco, California11.2%Garden Grove, California11.1%Los Angeles, California11.1%Omaha, Nebraska11.1%Westminster, Colorado11.1%Tuscaloosa, Alabama11.1%Round Rock, Texas11.1%Downey, California11.0%Nashville-Davidson metropol…11.0%Houston, Texas11.0%Clovis, California11.0%Bakersfield, California11.0%Quincy, Massachusetts11.0%Washington, District of Col…10.9%South Fulton, Georgia10.9%Pomona, California10.9%Edinburg, Texas10.9%Kent, Washington10.8%Riverview, Florida10.8%Riverside, California10.7%Brownsville, Texas10.7%Arvada, Colorado10.7%Grand Prairie, Texas10.7%Norwalk, California10.7%Richmond, California10.6%Murfreesboro, Tennessee10.6%Tempe, Arizona10.5%Columbia, Maryland10.5%Moreno Valley, California10.5%Gainesville, Florida10.5%Murrieta, California10.4%Elizabeth, New Jersey10.4%Midland, Texas10.4%Huntington Beach, California10.4%Thousand Oaks, California10.3%Orlando, Florida10.3%Arlington, Texas10.3%Bend, Oregon10.2%Stamford, Connecticut10.2%Odessa, Texas10.2%Hayward, California10.2%Provo, Utah10.2%Berkeley, California10.2%Fort Worth, Texas10.2%Chula Vista, California10.1%Pasadena, California10.1%Rochester, Minnesota10.1%Goodyear, Arizona10.1%Joliet, Illinois10.1%Thornton, Colorado10.1%Denver, Colorado10.1%Scottsdale, Arizona10.1%Elk Grove, California10.0%Seattle, Washington10.0%San Diego, California10.0%Sioux Falls, South Dakota9.9%Oxnard, California9.9%Anaheim, California9.9%Durham, North Carolina9.9%Concord, North Carolina9.8%Elgin, Illinois9.8%Chandler, Arizona9.8%Meridian, Idaho9.7%Jurupa Valley, California9.7%Torrance, California9.7%League City, Texas9.7%Charleston, South Carolina9.7%Temecula, California9.7%Lewisville, Texas9.7%West Valley City, Utah9.6%San Jose, California9.6%Raleigh, North Carolina9.6%Rialto, California9.5%Santa Clarita, California9.5%Austin, Texas9.5%Davie, Florida9.5%Olathe, Kansas9.5%Ontario, California9.4%Enterprise, Nevada9.4%Rancho Cucamonga, California9.3%Daly City, California9.1%Garland, Texas9.1%Fontana, California9.1%Madison, Wisconsin9.1%Coral Springs, Florida9.1%Aurora, Illinois9.0%Corona, California9.0%Orange, California9.0%Centennial, Colorado8.9%San Mateo, California8.9%Carrollton, Texas8.9%Fort Collins, Colorado8.8%Overland Park, Kansas8.8%Salinas, California8.8%Lee's Summit, Missouri8.7%Fullerton, California8.7%West Jordan, Utah8.7%Carlsbad, California8.6%Paterson, New Jersey8.5%Santa Ana, California8.5%Richardson, Texas8.5%Costa Mesa, California8.3%Bellevue, Washington8.3%Charlotte, North Carolina8.3%Sugar Land, Texas8.2%Sandy Springs, Georgia8.2%College Station, Texas8.1%Gilbert, Arizona8.1%Ann Arbor, Michigan8.1%Plano, Texas7.8%Cary, North Carolina7.8%Miramar, Florida7.7%Jersey City, New Jersey7.6%Highlands Ranch, Colorado7.5%McKinney, Texas7.5%Santa Clara, California7.5%Boulder, Colorado7.4%Cambridge, Massachusetts7.4%Pearland, Texas7.2%Alexandria, Virginia7.1%The Woodlands, Texas7.1%Naperville, Illinois7.0%Frisco, Texas6.9%Fremont, California6.9%Irving, Texas6.9%Sunnyvale, California6.8%Allen, Texas6.7%Arlington, Virginia6.6%Fishers, Indiana6.3%Carmel, Indiana6.1%Irvine, California
Summary

Every included city with at least 100,000 residents, 346 in all. Ponce, Puerto Rico leads at 25.3%. Irvine, California is lowest at 6.1%. The middle city sits at 12.1%. The ranking is each city's own disability rate for the civilian noninstitutionalized population.

Table 1

All cities

346 rows · 8 columns

346 rows
View100%
DownloadPDFImageCSV
Summary

Disability rate, margin of error, people with and without a disability, the civilian noninstitutionalized population, and total population for every US city (Census place) with at least 100,000 residents in the 2023 ACS five-year estimates, including the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico places that meet the cutoff.

All cities
??????
Abilene, Texas14.1%0.8%16,23198,783115,014127,130262
Akron, Ohio16.3%0.8%30,656157,101187,757189,52676
Albany, New York15.1%1.0%14,93983,87498,813100,08148
Albuquerque, New Mexico15.2%0.4%84,891472,780557,671562,488118
Alexandria, Virginia7.2%0.4%10,980141,521152,501156,788,
Allen, Texas6.8%0.7%7,306100,044107,350107,68444
Allentown, Pennsylvania16.2%1.0%20,036103,363123,399125,32053
Amarillo, Texas13.0%0.6%25,840173,214199,054200,94543
Anaheim, California9.9%0.4%33,991308,752342,743344,553138
Anchorage, Alaska12.2%0.4%33,792242,722276,514289,069,
Ann Arbor, Michigan8.1%0.6%9,768110,866120,634121,17950
Antioch, California14.8%1.2%17,08598,366115,451115,759110
Arlington, Texas10.3%0.5%40,428352,939393,367394,769103
Arlington, Virginia6.7%0.4%15,424215,496230,920235,463,
Arvada, Colorado10.7%0.7%13,082109,254122,336122,83566
Athens-Clarke County unified government (balance), Georgia12.2%0.9%15,436110,645126,081126,987688
Atlanta, Georgia11.6%0.5%57,040434,419491,459499,28790
Augusta-Richmond County consolidated government (balance), Georgia19.0%0.9%36,156153,732189,888201,50420
Aurora, Colorado11.6%0.4%44,802341,933386,735390,201117
Aurora, Illinois9.1%0.6%16,209162,830179,039179,867480
Austin, Texas9.5%0.3%91,417871,295962,712967,862373
Bakersfield, California11.0%0.5%44,682361,753406,435408,36697
Baltimore, Maryland16.5%0.4%93,856475,791569,647577,193,
Baton Rouge, Louisiana16.3%0.8%36,194185,312221,506223,69958
Bayamón, Puerto Rico22.8%0.7%36,984125,583162,567167,3121,545
Beaumont, Texas14.6%0.9%16,46395,963112,426113,71063
Bellevue, Washington8.3%0.6%12,475138,280150,755151,19961
Bend, Oregon10.3%0.9%10,37490,819101,193101,47276
Berkeley, California10.2%0.7%12,231107,670119,901120,22350
Billings, Montana14.5%0.9%16,92799,431116,358118,32143
Birmingham, Alabama18.2%0.9%35,660160,323195,983199,322646
Boise City, Idaho12.1%0.6%28,268204,846233,114235,70154
Boston, Massachusetts12.1%0.3%79,915579,861659,776663,97276
Boulder, Colorado7.5%0.7%7,84797,331105,178106,27449
Brandon, Florida12.3%0.8%13,98399,495113,478116,3653,137
Bridgeport, Connecticut16.7%0.9%24,502122,164146,666148,012100
Brockton, Massachusetts13.6%0.9%14,10389,940104,043105,08050
Broken Arrow, Oklahoma11.5%0.6%13,296101,920115,216115,91985
Brownsville, Texas10.7%0.6%20,017166,715186,732188,02390
Buffalo, New York16.5%0.7%45,184229,472274,656276,39765
Burbank, California11.5%1.0%12,09792,708104,805105,16581
Cambridge, Massachusetts7.4%0.6%8,674108,692117,366117,79460
Cape Coral, Florida14.0%0.8%28,817176,773205,590206,38742
Carlsbad, California8.7%0.8%9,804103,332113,136114,50085
Carmel, Indiana6.3%0.6%6,30193,738100,039100,501198
Carolina, Puerto Rico19.3%0.8%26,677111,783138,460139,0511,354
Carrollton, Texas8.9%0.7%11,783120,327132,110132,741170
Cary, North Carolina7.8%0.6%13,768162,587176,355176,686139
Cedar Rapids, Iowa11.6%0.7%15,744119,589135,333136,85960
Centennial, Colorado9.0%0.7%9,50496,547106,051107,38670
Chandler, Arizona9.8%0.5%27,246250,266277,512278,12377
Charleston, South Carolina9.7%0.7%14,561135,415149,976152,01477
Charlotte, North Carolina8.3%0.3%72,824808,373881,197886,283226
Chattanooga, Tennessee14.5%0.8%26,125153,831179,956182,83279
Chesapeake, Virginia12.5%0.6%29,833209,340239,173251,153,
Chicago, Illinois11.9%0.2%319,7162,364,1942,683,9102,707,64872
Chico, California14.5%1.0%14,69386,578101,271102,03257
Chula Vista, California10.2%0.5%27,341241,548268,889275,03061
Cincinnati, Ohio13.6%0.6%41,565263,334304,899309,59563
Clarksville, Tennessee14.8%0.8%23,573135,632159,205171,89751
Clearwater, Florida14.9%1.0%17,15198,247115,398117,07558
Cleveland, Ohio19.9%0.6%71,950290,107362,057367,52361
Clovis, California11.0%0.7%13,447108,747122,194122,71969
College Station, Texas8.2%0.8%9,954111,982121,936122,28066
Colorado Springs, Colorado13.2%0.4%61,400404,928466,328483,09979
Columbia, Maryland10.5%0.8%11,05593,795104,850105,8712,631
Columbia, Missouri11.9%0.8%14,984111,047126,031127,20064
Columbia, South Carolina12.7%0.9%15,355105,829121,184138,019187
Columbus, Georgia17.4%0.8%33,888160,913194,801204,383,
Columbus, Ohio12.2%0.3%110,250790,333900,583906,480134
Concord, California12.5%0.9%15,450108,059123,509124,26042
Concord, North Carolina9.9%0.9%10,38194,868105,249106,51849
Coral Springs, Florida9.1%0.7%12,113121,594133,707133,96264
Corona, California9.0%0.6%14,251143,798158,049158,83997
Corpus Christi, Texas13.4%0.5%41,760269,736311,496317,38378
Costa Mesa, California8.5%0.7%9,352100,760110,112110,53883
Dallas, Texas11.4%0.3%146,5961,143,2641,289,8601,299,553141
Daly City, California9.3%0.7%9,48092,393101,873102,56052
Davenport, Iowa13.9%0.8%13,85485,92099,774101,08334
Davie, Florida9.5%1.0%10,06496,095106,159106,41262
Dayton, Ohio18.7%1.0%25,085108,787133,872136,74170
Dearborn, Michigan12.4%0.8%13,29894,315107,613107,84657
Denton, Texas12.1%0.8%17,613127,626145,239146,98768
Denver, Colorado10.1%0.3%71,273635,280706,553713,734,
Des Moines, Iowa14.3%0.6%30,097180,776210,873212,464185
Detroit, Michigan19.6%0.4%123,795507,829631,624636,644159
Downey, California11.1%0.8%12,27998,811111,090111,79361
Durham, North Carolina9.9%0.5%28,235258,026286,261288,465163
East Los Angeles, California11.4%0.7%13,092101,378114,470114,6173,058
Edinburg, Texas10.9%1.1%10,71687,78098,496102,56151
El Cajon, California14.9%1.1%15,38487,529102,913104,90994
El Monte, California12.1%0.8%12,80493,416106,220107,066113
El Paso, Texas14.3%0.4%94,513567,916662,429678,147153
Elgin, Illinois9.8%0.7%11,075101,655112,730114,106399
Elizabeth, New Jersey10.4%0.8%14,087120,872134,959135,88779
Elk Grove, California10.1%0.6%17,789159,070176,859177,221134
Enterprise, Nevada9.4%0.6%21,696209,970231,666232,0435,278
Escondido, California12.7%0.9%18,833129,713148,546149,91383
Eugene, Oregon15.1%0.7%26,590149,766176,356177,52070
Evansville, Indiana18.6%0.9%21,30492,943114,247116,44134
Everett, Washington15.8%0.9%17,11391,035108,148111,08380
Fairfield, California12.8%0.8%14,958102,163117,121119,98550
Fargo, North Dakota11.4%0.8%14,522112,927127,449129,06449
Fayetteville, North Carolina16.2%0.6%29,170151,068180,238209,69287
Fishers, Indiana6.6%0.8%6,59293,501100,093100,91835
Fontana, California9.1%0.6%19,211192,313211,524211,92198
Fort Collins, Colorado8.9%0.6%14,890153,016167,906169,70563
Fort Lauderdale, Florida12.4%0.8%22,370158,678181,048183,03256
Fort Wayne, Indiana13.6%0.5%35,887227,484263,371266,235395
Fort Worth, Texas10.2%0.3%94,806834,609929,415941,311527
Fremont, California6.9%0.4%15,806211,891227,697228,51857
Fresno, California14.2%0.4%76,596461,456538,052543,615107
Frisco, Texas7.0%0.5%14,628195,097209,725210,238162
Fullerton, California8.7%0.7%12,216128,224140,440141,27865
Gainesville, Florida10.5%0.9%14,894126,902141,796143,61198
Garden Grove, California11.2%0.6%18,973150,947169,920170,60385
Garland, Texas9.1%0.5%22,246222,463244,709245,298145
Gilbert, Arizona8.1%0.4%22,041248,777270,818271,118101
Glendale, Arizona15.8%0.7%38,937208,078247,015250,19386
Glendale, California12.8%0.7%24,453166,473190,926192,27067
Goodyear, Arizona10.1%0.9%9,86487,63097,494102,89162
Grand Prairie, Texas10.7%0.7%21,140176,949198,089198,56492
Grand Rapids, Michigan11.9%0.7%23,220171,221194,441197,76888
Greeley, Colorado12.8%0.8%13,81793,967107,784109,42162
Green Bay, Wisconsin15.0%1.0%15,88689,797105,683106,58591
Greensboro, North Carolina11.8%0.5%35,011260,611295,622298,564102
Gresham, Oregon16.7%1.1%18,72793,447112,174112,81858
Hampton, Virginia16.3%0.8%21,241109,098130,339137,334,
Hartford, Connecticut15.2%1.0%17,96999,979117,948119,97053
Hayward, California10.2%0.6%16,138141,941158,079159,20169
Henderson, Nevada12.4%0.5%40,102282,483322,585324,52351
Hesperia, California12.9%1.0%12,89787,149100,046100,14144
Hialeah, Florida13.1%0.7%28,985191,860220,845221,90167
High Point, North Carolina12.9%0.9%14,72299,346114,068115,26363
Highlands Ranch, Colorado7.6%0.6%7,67893,129100,807101,4372,176
Hillsboro, Oregon11.5%0.9%12,24393,891106,134107,05043
Hollywood, Florida11.7%0.8%17,800133,918151,718152,93560
Houston, Texas11.0%0.2%251,2042,030,5272,281,7312,300,419172
Huntington Beach, California10.4%0.6%20,331175,197195,528196,01078
Huntsville, Alabama14.3%0.7%30,740184,174214,914218,81461
Independence, Missouri16.4%0.9%19,795101,007120,802121,94474
Indianapolis city (balance), Indiana13.5%0.3%117,960755,415873,375882,043878
Inglewood, California14.2%1.0%14,91690,034104,950105,57557
Irvine, California6.1%0.4%18,727289,046307,773308,160117
Irving, Texas6.9%0.5%17,543236,815254,358255,03657
Jackson, Mississippi15.2%0.8%22,556125,851148,407149,82770
Jacksonville, Florida13.5%0.3%126,516811,199937,715961,73952
Jersey City, New Jersey7.7%0.4%22,371266,472288,843289,69157
Joliet, Illinois10.1%0.6%14,926132,808147,734149,785914
Jurupa Valley, California9.7%0.7%10,27795,363105,640106,24454
Kansas City, Kansas13.9%0.7%21,353132,272153,625154,77626
Kansas City, Missouri12.8%0.4%64,576439,412503,988508,233121
Kent, Washington10.9%0.7%14,533119,355133,888135,01573
Killeen, Texas15.2%0.8%22,065122,637144,702156,14460
Knoxville, Tennessee14.1%0.7%26,992165,115192,107193,72180
Lafayette, Louisiana12.9%1.0%15,453104,491119,944121,53775
Lakeland, Florida15.6%1.0%17,94897,282115,230117,03064
Lakewood, Colorado12.7%0.7%19,590135,061154,651156,309154
Lancaster, California11.9%0.7%19,663146,100165,763170,01362
Lansing, Michigan16.6%1.0%18,69193,656112,347112,54666
Laredo, Texas13.2%0.6%33,599220,659254,258255,94941
Las Cruces, New Mexico14.7%1.0%16,37994,943111,322112,61286
Las Vegas, Nevada13.3%0.4%85,350556,258641,608650,873108
League City, Texas9.7%0.8%11,083102,975114,058114,885119
Lee's Summit, Missouri8.8%0.8%8,96592,763101,728102,58351
Lehigh Acres, Florida11.7%0.8%14,904112,331127,235127,3913,339
Lewisville, Texas9.7%0.7%12,373115,443127,816128,313470
Lexington-Fayette urban county, Kentucky12.8%0.5%40,387276,304316,691321,122,
Lincoln, Nebraska12.0%0.5%34,584252,789287,373291,93271
Little Rock, Arkansas13.9%0.8%27,891172,278200,169202,73978
Long Beach, California11.4%0.4%51,977403,201455,178458,49171
Los Angeles, California11.1%0.1%426,7933,403,0703,829,8633,857,89775
Louisville/Jefferson County metro government (balance), Kentucky14.7%0.4%91,424528,827620,251627,210145
Lowell, Massachusetts14.8%1.0%16,87396,965113,838114,79946
Lubbock, Texas13.0%0.5%33,472224,314257,786261,07849
Lynn, Massachusetts13.6%1.1%13,65187,022100,673100,90583
Macon-Bibb County, Georgia15.8%0.8%24,183128,948153,131156,543,
Madison, Wisconsin9.1%0.5%24,880249,135274,015275,56876
Manchester, New Hampshire13.6%1.0%15,49498,201113,695115,41561
McAllen, Texas13.0%0.8%18,558124,262142,820143,78956
McKinney, Texas7.5%0.5%15,146185,479200,625202,31465
Memphis, Tennessee13.6%0.4%84,370535,588619,958629,06384
Menifee, California13.8%1.2%14,66691,650106,316107,02063
Meridian, Idaho9.8%0.8%12,160112,028124,188124,86575
Mesa, Arizona13.0%0.4%65,355439,184504,539507,47887
Mesquite, Texas12.2%0.9%18,148130,128148,276148,848473
Metairie, Louisiana14.4%0.8%19,865118,542138,407138,9953,016
Miami Gardens, Florida12.9%1.1%14,37596,780111,155111,264111
Miami, Florida11.5%0.5%50,525390,428440,953446,66377
Midland, Texas10.4%0.9%13,821119,075132,896133,99847
Milwaukee, Wisconsin13.2%0.4%74,408491,190565,598569,75649
Minneapolis, Minnesota11.6%0.4%49,164373,574422,738426,84569
Miramar, Florida7.8%0.8%10,529125,280135,809135,98663
Mobile, Alabama12.4%0.6%22,534159,469182,003185,09752
Modesto, California13.6%0.7%29,527187,762217,289218,61491
Montgomery, Alabama16.1%0.8%31,182162,204193,386198,44040
Moreno Valley, California10.5%0.5%22,088187,738209,826210,37868
Murfreesboro, Tennessee10.6%0.8%16,527139,810156,337157,54753
Murrieta, California10.5%0.9%11,58699,009110,595111,62163
Nampa, Idaho15.3%1.1%16,07989,219105,298106,28952
Naperville, Illinois7.1%0.6%10,490137,641148,131149,424393
Nashville-Davidson metropolitan government (balance), Tennessee11.0%0.3%74,802603,777678,579684,29877
New Bedford, Massachusetts16.1%1.0%15,99483,62799,621100,73162
New Haven, Connecticut11.8%0.9%15,524116,173131,697132,89376
New Orleans, Louisiana14.1%0.4%52,249319,300371,549376,035,
New York, New York11.7%0.1%988,7797,471,4678,460,2468,516,202,
Newark, New Jersey16.7%0.7%49,938249,805299,743307,18849
Newport News, Virginia14.6%0.7%25,448149,219174,667184,774,
Norfolk, Virginia14.8%0.6%30,749177,549208,298235,037,
Norman, Oklahoma14.4%0.9%18,332108,740127,072128,71476
North Charleston, South Carolina11.9%0.9%13,30798,908112,215117,46080
North Las Vegas, Nevada12.4%0.5%33,086233,354266,440270,77364
Norwalk, California10.7%0.8%10,62289,07899,700100,71359
Oakland, California11.7%0.4%50,941384,952435,893438,07258
Oceanside, California12.2%0.6%20,592147,911168,503172,54276
Odessa, Texas10.2%0.9%11,536101,232112,768114,08049
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma13.9%0.3%94,116583,333677,449688,693148
Olathe, Kansas9.5%0.7%13,506128,963142,469143,72063
Omaha, Nebraska11.1%0.3%53,763428,704482,467488,19768
Ontario, California9.5%0.6%16,821161,080177,901178,34766
Orange, California9.0%0.7%12,199123,329135,528138,72368
Orlando, Florida10.3%0.5%31,973277,340309,313311,732141
Overland Park, Kansas8.8%0.5%17,298178,559195,857197,19994
Oxnard, California9.9%0.5%19,840179,866199,706201,01462
Palm Bay, Florida16.3%1.1%20,279103,973124,252125,273104
Palmdale, California11.6%0.7%19,144146,201165,345165,48766
Paradise, Nevada14.7%0.6%27,226158,299185,525186,1784,601
Pasadena, California10.1%0.7%13,714121,554135,268136,46263
Pasadena, Texas12.1%0.8%17,970130,447148,417149,34559
Paterson, New Jersey8.6%0.6%13,469143,364156,833157,660137
Pearland, Texas7.4%0.7%9,250115,961125,211125,98375
Pembroke Pines, Florida11.2%0.9%19,040150,605169,645170,55764
Peoria, Arizona13.3%0.9%25,663166,970192,633194,338207
Peoria, Illinois14.6%0.9%16,19494,632110,826112,126429
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania17.4%0.3%273,6851,296,4171,570,1021,582,432,
Phoenix, Arizona11.5%0.2%184,8311,427,1591,611,9901,624,832112
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania14.2%0.5%42,546256,676299,222303,62057
Plano, Texas8.1%0.4%23,065263,251286,316287,33974
Pomona, California10.9%0.6%16,004130,791146,795148,39154
Pompano Beach, Florida13.6%1.0%14,83294,594109,426112,21280
Ponce, Puerto Rico25.3%0.8%27,52881,390108,918109,7651,858
Port St. Lucie, Florida14.1%0.8%30,994188,596219,590220,45373
Portland, Oregon13.2%0.4%83,926554,043637,969642,715699
Providence, Rhode Island13.7%0.9%25,761161,859187,620190,21461
Provo, Utah10.2%0.7%11,590101,970113,560114,30348
Pueblo, Colorado19.4%1.0%20,93086,772107,702111,51451
Quincy, Massachusetts11.0%1.0%11,03189,691100,722101,36135
Raleigh, North Carolina9.6%0.5%44,643419,905464,548470,763429
Rancho Cucamonga, California9.4%0.6%16,081155,760171,841174,69383
Reno, Nevada12.1%0.5%32,309234,038266,347268,959101
Renton, Washington11.4%0.9%11,98892,937104,925105,27970
Rialto, California9.6%0.7%9,94093,518103,458103,86660
Richardson, Texas8.5%0.8%10,047107,696117,743118,26991
Richmond, California10.7%0.8%12,208102,397114,605115,39654
Richmond, Virginia14.0%0.7%31,455193,708225,163227,595,
Rio Rancho, New Mexico14.1%0.9%14,95791,066106,023106,53372
Riverside, California10.8%0.5%33,932280,117314,049316,241115
Riverview, Florida10.8%0.9%11,58095,195106,775107,7763,794
Rochester, Minnesota10.1%0.6%12,133107,738119,871121,63872
Rochester, New York19.1%0.7%39,442167,490206,932209,720114
Rockford, Illinois16.7%0.8%24,201120,827145,028147,649300
Roseville, California11.3%0.7%17,127134,393151,520152,43880
Round Rock, Texas11.1%0.9%13,681109,962123,643124,288898
Sacramento, California12.4%0.4%64,317456,311520,628524,802252
Salem, Oregon15.4%0.8%26,297145,017171,314176,66696
Salinas, California8.8%0.6%14,217146,842161,059161,993109
Salt Lake City, Utah12.1%0.7%24,496178,183202,679203,88877
San Antonio, Texas15.5%0.3%222,6931,212,6831,435,3761,458,954118
San Bernardino, California12.8%0.7%27,678188,462216,140221,77488
San Buenaventura (Ventura), California13.4%0.9%14,51093,981108,491109,90062
San Diego, California10.0%0.2%133,9181,203,5671,337,4851,385,061147
San Francisco, California11.2%0.3%93,209739,000832,209836,321,
San Jose, California9.6%0.2%94,971891,241986,212990,054201
San Juan, Puerto Rico20.7%0.5%65,811251,738317,549320,6911,975
San Mateo, California8.9%0.7%9,24494,060103,304103,55558
San Tan Valley, Arizona13.2%1.1%13,87591,221105,096105,2312,932
Sandy Springs, Georgia8.2%0.8%8,78897,830106,618107,19840
Santa Ana, California8.5%0.4%26,434283,095309,529311,63989
Santa Clara, California7.5%0.6%9,694118,918128,612129,23965
Santa Clarita, California9.5%0.6%21,842206,887228,729229,02197
Santa Maria, California11.4%0.9%12,44496,723109,167109,88048
Santa Rosa, California12.7%0.7%22,312153,158175,470177,21654
Savannah, Georgia15.9%0.9%22,577119,010141,587147,54685
Scottsdale, Arizona10.1%0.5%24,237216,275240,512242,169118
Seattle, Washington10.0%0.3%73,793661,839735,632741,440121
Shreveport, Louisiana17.8%0.9%31,831146,751178,582183,48360
Simi Valley, California11.5%0.8%14,425111,010125,435125,76977
Sioux Falls, South Dakota10.0%0.5%19,476175,247194,723197,64266
South Bend, Indiana14.7%0.8%14,87686,458101,334102,866612
South Fulton, Georgia10.9%1.4%11,88196,830108,711109,15751
Sparks, Nevada13.0%0.9%14,12594,560108,685109,10675
Spokane Valley, Washington17.7%1.2%18,53086,106104,636105,46071
Spokane, Washington16.9%0.7%38,310187,939226,249229,22874
Spring Hill, Florida18.5%0.9%21,74995,644117,393118,8142,310
Spring Valley, Nevada12.2%0.6%26,700192,977219,677219,9135,139
Springfield, Illinois14.9%0.9%16,68695,492112,178113,714376
Springfield, Massachusetts18.3%0.9%28,201125,863154,064154,75191
Springfield, Missouri16.8%0.8%27,969138,322166,291169,43292
St. Louis, Missouri16.6%0.6%47,879241,326289,205293,109,
St. Paul, Minnesota12.5%0.5%38,075267,118305,193307,76248
St. Petersburg, Florida12.9%0.6%33,089223,490256,579260,64654
Stamford, Connecticut10.2%0.8%13,843121,354135,197135,80640
Sterling Heights, Michigan13.6%0.8%18,029114,765132,794133,47373
Stockton, California14.2%0.5%45,137273,364318,501320,470131
Sugar Land, Texas8.3%0.7%9,046100,451109,497109,73564
Sunnyvale, California6.9%0.6%10,511142,169152,680153,45592
Sunrise Manor, Nevada15.0%0.7%29,842168,864198,706199,0993,940
Surprise, Arizona12.7%0.8%18,873129,282148,155149,51964
Syracuse, New York16.6%0.8%23,911119,828143,739146,21165
Tacoma, Washington15.1%0.7%32,612183,021215,633220,48273
Tallahassee, Florida11.4%0.7%22,476173,987196,463199,696118
Tampa, Florida11.9%0.4%46,350342,355388,705393,389134
Temecula, California9.7%0.8%10,57098,407108,977110,40464
Tempe, Arizona10.6%0.7%19,633166,149185,782186,41981
The Woodlands, Texas7.1%0.6%8,280108,125116,405116,9165,154
Thornton, Colorado10.1%0.7%14,360127,935142,295142,87877
Thousand Oaks, California10.4%0.7%12,978112,179125,157125,67660
Toledo, Ohio17.3%0.6%46,035219,795265,830268,46164
Topeka, Kansas16.4%0.9%20,169102,813122,982126,10343
Torrance, California9.7%0.7%13,853128,559142,412143,49965
Tucson, Arizona15.5%0.4%81,568444,146525,714543,34898
Tulsa, Oklahoma14.4%0.4%58,887349,186408,073412,322129
Tuscaloosa, Alabama11.1%0.9%11,78494,698106,482107,69946
Tyler, Texas12.4%0.9%13,06092,533105,593107,71863
Urban Honolulu, Hawaii12.5%0.4%41,918292,580334,498346,323116
Vacaville, California12.1%0.9%11,38282,97694,358102,08563
Vallejo, California12.9%0.8%15,951107,856123,807124,63770
Vancouver, Washington15.1%0.7%28,940162,118191,058192,696110
Victorville, California14.8%1.0%19,498111,986131,484135,98380
Virginia Beach, Virginia11.7%0.4%50,682381,734432,416457,066,
Visalia, California11.7%0.8%16,653125,075141,728142,6491,065
Waco, Texas12.7%0.8%17,604121,455139,059141,925137
Warren, Michigan15.2%0.8%20,783116,306137,089138,12856
Washington, District of Columbia11.0%0.4%72,611590,403663,014672,079,
Waterbury, Connecticut18.6%1.1%21,15292,350113,502114,35639
West Covina, California11.9%0.8%12,73094,242106,972107,43676
West Jordan, Utah8.7%0.7%10,031105,722115,753116,27773
West Palm Beach, Florida11.4%0.9%13,440104,496117,936119,508117
West Valley City, Utah9.7%0.6%13,299124,149137,448137,95555
Westminster, Colorado11.1%0.8%12,733102,252114,985115,54683
Wichita Falls, Texas14.2%0.9%12,94778,35291,299102,55839
Wichita, Kansas14.9%0.5%58,201332,596390,797396,48882
Wilmington, North Carolina12.9%0.9%15,228102,586117,814118,57853
Winston-Salem, North Carolina12.6%0.6%31,398216,975248,373250,88768
Worcester, Massachusetts14.7%0.8%29,972173,381203,353205,50174
Yonkers, New York14.1%0.8%29,405179,298208,703209,52981

Image files

Download all

Figure 2

Disability rate, all published cities

Figure 2: Disability rate, all published cities
DownloadPDFImageCSV

About this data

  • A city is included when the ACS published at least 100,000 residents in the 2023 five-year estimates (table B01003). Smaller places are left out.
  • Disability status is asked of the civilian noninstitutionalized population (table B18101). People living in institutional group quarters such as prisons and nursing homes are not included.
  • With a disability and without a disability are the summed age and sex disability cells in B18101 for both sexes and all ages. The disability rate is people with a disability divided by the civilian noninstitutionalized population in that table. A single age band is not used as the city rate.
  • A midpoint of city rates is not a United States disability rate. These rows cannot be averaged into the national figure.
  • The map covers the 48 contiguous states. Cities in Alaska, Hawaii and Puerto Rico stay in the ranking and table.
  • ACS margins of error published as controlled sentinels (for example −555555555 / *****) are not sampling errors; they are stored as missing and shown as a dash.
  • Places without a packaged map dot stay in the ranking and table.