Poverty rate by US city

Summary

Poverty rate, US cities

Poverty rate by city · all 346 cities · hover or tap a city for every figure on this page

346 items
View100%
DownloadPDFImageCSV
CitiesDetroit, Michigan
Poverty rate, US citiesDarker amber is a higher poverty rate. Each city is a marked point on the US state map. Alaska and Hawaii are inset. Places without a packaged map dot stay in the ranking and table. Puerto Rico cities are in the ranking and table but are not drawn here.Highlands Ranch, Colorado · Poverty rate: 2.4% · Margin of error: 0.5% · People below poverty: 2,437 · Poverty universe: 101,224 · Total population: 101,437Centennial, Colorado · Poverty rate: 3.1% · Margin of error: 0.5% · People below poverty: 3,339 · Poverty universe: 106,105 · Total population: 107,386Frisco, Texas · Poverty rate: 3.5% · Margin of error: 0.7% · People below poverty: 7,415 · Poverty universe: 209,491 · Total population: 210,238Fishers, Indiana · Poverty rate: 3.6% · Margin of error: 0.9% · People below poverty: 3,579 · Poverty universe: 100,433 · Total population: 100,918Carmel, Indiana · Poverty rate: 3.7% · Margin of error: 0.8% · People below poverty: 3,738 · Poverty universe: 99,894 · Total population: 100,501Pearland, Texas · Poverty rate: 4.2% · Margin of error: 0.9% · People below poverty: 5,291 · Poverty universe: 125,158 · Total population: 125,983Naperville, Illinois · Poverty rate: 4.4% · Margin of error: 0.7% · People below poverty: 6,401 · Poverty universe: 146,839 · Total population: 149,424League City, Texas · Poverty rate: 4.5% · Margin of error: 0.7% · People below poverty: 5,157 · Poverty universe: 114,159 · Total population: 114,885Allen, Texas · Poverty rate: 4.8% · Margin of error: 1.1% · People below poverty: 5,187 · Poverty universe: 107,173 · Total population: 107,684Overland Park, Kansas · Poverty rate: 4.9% · Margin of error: 0.6% · People below poverty: 9,533 · Poverty universe: 195,763 · Total population: 197,199Fremont, California · Poverty rate: 5.1% · Margin of error: 0.6% · People below poverty: 11,541 · Poverty universe: 227,299 · Total population: 228,518Sugar Land, Texas · Poverty rate: 5.1% · Margin of error: 0.9% · People below poverty: 5,603 · Poverty universe: 109,571 · Total population: 109,735Gilbert, Arizona · Poverty rate: 5.1% · Margin of error: 0.6% · People below poverty: 13,827 · Poverty universe: 269,453 · Total population: 271,118Cary, North Carolina · Poverty rate: 5.3% · Margin of error: 0.8% · People below poverty: 9,309 · Poverty universe: 176,287 · Total population: 176,686Lee's Summit, Missouri · Poverty rate: 5.5% · Margin of error: 1.1% · People below poverty: 5,586 · Poverty universe: 101,635 · Total population: 102,583The Woodlands, Texas · Poverty rate: 5.6% · Margin of error: 1.2% · People below poverty: 6,494 · Poverty universe: 116,307 · Total population: 116,916Olathe, Kansas · Poverty rate: 5.6% · Margin of error: 0.8% · People below poverty: 7,935 · Poverty universe: 141,909 · Total population: 143,720Sunnyvale, California · Poverty rate: 5.6% · Margin of error: 0.6% · People below poverty: 8,529 · Poverty universe: 152,408 · Total population: 153,455Goodyear, Arizona · Poverty rate: 5.8% · Margin of error: 1.1% · People below poverty: 5,656 · Poverty universe: 97,803 · Total population: 102,891Murrieta, California · Poverty rate: 5.9% · Margin of error: 1.1% · People below poverty: 6,591 · Poverty universe: 111,009 · Total population: 111,621Roseville, California · Poverty rate: 6.0% · Margin of error: 0.8% · People below poverty: 9,024 · Poverty universe: 151,523 · Total population: 152,438Arvada, Colorado · Poverty rate: 6.0% · Margin of error: 0.9% · People below poverty: 7,291 · Poverty universe: 122,208 · Total population: 122,835McKinney, Texas · Poverty rate: 6.1% · Margin of error: 0.9% · People below poverty: 12,155 · Poverty universe: 200,173 · Total population: 202,314West Jordan, Utah · Poverty rate: 6.2% · Margin of error: 1.2% · People below poverty: 7,155 · Poverty universe: 115,691 · Total population: 116,277Meridian, Idaho · Poverty rate: 6.2% · Margin of error: 1.1% · People below poverty: 7,733 · Poverty universe: 124,092 · Total population: 124,865Simi Valley, California · Poverty rate: 6.7% · Margin of error: 0.9% · People below poverty: 8,363 · Poverty universe: 125,095 · Total population: 125,769Carrollton, Texas · Poverty rate: 6.8% · Margin of error: 1.1% · People below poverty: 9,050 · Poverty universe: 132,173 · Total population: 132,741Torrance, California · Poverty rate: 6.9% · Margin of error: 1.0% · People below poverty: 9,817 · Poverty universe: 142,274 · Total population: 143,499Carlsbad, California · Poverty rate: 6.9% · Margin of error: 1.6% · People below poverty: 7,905 · Poverty universe: 113,917 · Total population: 114,500Westminster, Colorado · Poverty rate: 7.0% · Margin of error: 0.9% · People below poverty: 8,107 · Poverty universe: 115,059 · Total population: 115,546Plano, Texas · Poverty rate: 7.1% · Margin of error: 0.7% · People below poverty: 20,345 · Poverty universe: 286,199 · Total population: 287,339Arlington, Virginia · Poverty rate: 7.1% · Margin of error: 0.6% · People below poverty: 16,573 · Poverty universe: 232,638 · Total population: 235,463Scottsdale, Arizona · Poverty rate: 7.1% · Margin of error: 0.8% · People below poverty: 17,156 · Poverty universe: 240,450 · Total population: 242,169Daly City, California · Poverty rate: 7.3% · Margin of error: 1.0% · People below poverty: 7,394 · Poverty universe: 101,949 · Total population: 102,560Bellevue, Washington · Poverty rate: 7.3% · Margin of error: 1.1% · People below poverty: 10,954 · Poverty universe: 150,638 · Total population: 151,199Thornton, Colorado · Poverty rate: 7.3% · Margin of error: 1.2% · People below poverty: 10,345 · Poverty universe: 141,623 · Total population: 142,878Temecula, California · Poverty rate: 7.4% · Margin of error: 1.2% · People below poverty: 8,123 · Poverty universe: 109,825 · Total population: 110,404Sandy Springs, Georgia · Poverty rate: 7.4% · Margin of error: 1.4% · People below poverty: 7,892 · Poverty universe: 106,657 · Total population: 107,198Elk Grove, California · Poverty rate: 7.4% · Margin of error: 1.1% · People below poverty: 13,091 · Poverty universe: 176,784 · Total population: 177,221Clovis, California · Poverty rate: 7.4% · Margin of error: 1.1% · People below poverty: 9,040 · Poverty universe: 121,557 · Total population: 122,719Columbia, Maryland · Poverty rate: 7.4% · Margin of error: 1.2% · People below poverty: 7,847 · Poverty universe: 105,406 · Total population: 105,871Huntington Beach, California · Poverty rate: 7.5% · Margin of error: 0.8% · People below poverty: 14,531 · Poverty universe: 194,966 · Total population: 196,010Vacaville, California · Poverty rate: 7.5% · Margin of error: 1.5% · People below poverty: 7,159 · Poverty universe: 95,802 · Total population: 102,085San Tan Valley, Arizona · Poverty rate: 7.5% · Margin of error: 1.5% · People below poverty: 7,914 · Poverty universe: 104,838 · Total population: 105,231Lewisville, Texas · Poverty rate: 7.6% · Margin of error: 1.1% · People below poverty: 9,696 · Poverty universe: 127,582 · Total population: 128,313Round Rock, Texas · Poverty rate: 7.7% · Margin of error: 1.2% · People below poverty: 9,466 · Poverty universe: 123,502 · Total population: 124,288Chandler, Arizona · Poverty rate: 7.7% · Margin of error: 0.8% · People below poverty: 21,184 · Poverty universe: 276,343 · Total population: 278,123Santa Clarita, California · Poverty rate: 7.7% · Margin of error: 1.0% · People below poverty: 17,583 · Poverty universe: 227,164 · Total population: 229,021Renton, Washington · Poverty rate: 7.8% · Margin of error: 1.0% · People below poverty: 8,122 · Poverty universe: 104,633 · Total population: 105,279Riverview, Florida · Poverty rate: 7.8% · Margin of error: 1.5% · People below poverty: 8,371 · Poverty universe: 107,485 · Total population: 107,776Surprise, Arizona · Poverty rate: 7.8% · Margin of error: 1.2% · People below poverty: 11,589 · Poverty universe: 148,752 · Total population: 149,519Santa Clara, California · Poverty rate: 7.8% · Margin of error: 1.0% · People below poverty: 9,810 · Poverty universe: 125,303 · Total population: 129,239Rio Rancho, New Mexico · Poverty rate: 7.8% · Margin of error: 1.2% · People below poverty: 8,306 · Poverty universe: 105,981 · Total population: 106,533San Jose, California · Poverty rate: 7.8% · Margin of error: 0.4% · People below poverty: 76,869 · Poverty universe: 979,386 · Total population: 990,054San Mateo, California · Poverty rate: 7.9% · Margin of error: 1.0% · People below poverty: 8,152 · Poverty universe: 102,665 · Total population: 103,555Miramar, Florida · Poverty rate: 8.0% · Margin of error: 1.4% · People below poverty: 10,767 · Poverty universe: 135,343 · Total population: 135,986Thousand Oaks, California · Poverty rate: 8.0% · Margin of error: 1.3% · People below poverty: 9,924 · Poverty universe: 123,637 · Total population: 125,676Rancho Cucamonga, California · Poverty rate: 8.0% · Margin of error: 0.9% · People below poverty: 13,769 · Poverty universe: 171,527 · Total population: 174,693Oceanside, California · Poverty rate: 8.1% · Margin of error: 0.9% · People below poverty: 13,953 · Poverty universe: 171,492 · Total population: 172,542Hillsboro, Oregon · Poverty rate: 8.1% · Margin of error: 1.3% · People below poverty: 8,634 · Poverty universe: 105,960 · Total population: 107,050Coral Springs, Florida · Poverty rate: 8.3% · Margin of error: 1.4% · People below poverty: 11,015 · Poverty universe: 133,275 · Total population: 133,962Virginia Beach, Virginia · Poverty rate: 8.4% · Margin of error: 0.6% · People below poverty: 37,541 · Poverty universe: 448,753 · Total population: 457,066Peoria, Arizona · Poverty rate: 8.4% · Margin of error: 0.9% · People below poverty: 16,164 · Poverty universe: 192,289 · Total population: 194,338Alexandria, Virginia · Poverty rate: 8.4% · Margin of error: 0.9% · People below poverty: 13,037 · Poverty universe: 155,067 · Total population: 156,788Henderson, Nevada · Poverty rate: 8.4% · Margin of error: 0.7% · People below poverty: 27,110 · Poverty universe: 322,369 · Total population: 324,523Chula Vista, California · Poverty rate: 8.4% · Margin of error: 0.9% · People below poverty: 23,005 · Poverty universe: 273,106 · Total population: 275,030Port St. Lucie, Florida · Poverty rate: 8.5% · Margin of error: 1.3% · People below poverty: 18,643 · Poverty universe: 219,188 · Total population: 220,453Concord, North Carolina · Poverty rate: 8.6% · Margin of error: 1.5% · People below poverty: 9,058 · Poverty universe: 105,097 · Total population: 106,518Chesapeake, Virginia · Poverty rate: 8.7% · Margin of error: 1.0% · People below poverty: 21,444 · Poverty universe: 246,733 · Total population: 251,153Concord, California · Poverty rate: 8.9% · Margin of error: 1.2% · People below poverty: 10,943 · Poverty universe: 123,229 · Total population: 124,260Costa Mesa, California · Poverty rate: 8.9% · Margin of error: 1.0% · People below poverty: 9,812 · Poverty universe: 109,711 · Total population: 110,538Broken Arrow, Oklahoma · Poverty rate: 9.0% · Margin of error: 0.9% · People below poverty: 10,351 · Poverty universe: 115,079 · Total population: 115,919Sparks, Nevada · Poverty rate: 9.0% · Margin of error: 1.3% · People below poverty: 9,769 · Poverty universe: 108,349 · Total population: 109,106Rochester, Minnesota · Poverty rate: 9.1% · Margin of error: 1.2% · People below poverty: 10,772 · Poverty universe: 119,003 · Total population: 121,638Corona, California · Poverty rate: 9.1% · Margin of error: 1.2% · People below poverty: 14,308 · Poverty universe: 157,892 · Total population: 158,839Lakewood, Colorado · Poverty rate: 9.1% · Margin of error: 0.9% · People below poverty: 14,030 · Poverty universe: 153,842 · Total population: 156,309Downey, California · Poverty rate: 9.1% · Margin of error: 1.3% · People below poverty: 10,146 · Poverty universe: 110,962 · Total population: 111,793Orange, California · Poverty rate: 9.2% · Margin of error: 1.4% · People below poverty: 12,185 · Poverty universe: 133,116 · Total population: 138,723Anchorage, Alaska · Poverty rate: 9.3% · Margin of error: 0.7% · People below poverty: 26,226 · Poverty universe: 282,916 · Total population: 289,069Colorado Springs, Colorado · Poverty rate: 9.3% · Margin of error: 0.6% · People below poverty: 44,137 · Poverty universe: 474,212 · Total population: 483,099Enterprise, Nevada · Poverty rate: 9.4% · Margin of error: 1.0% · People below poverty: 21,820 · Poverty universe: 231,325 · Total population: 232,043Bend, Oregon · Poverty rate: 9.5% · Margin of error: 1.4% · People below poverty: 9,556 · Poverty universe: 100,999 · Total population: 101,472Hayward, California · Poverty rate: 9.5% · Margin of error: 1.0% · People below poverty: 14,820 · Poverty universe: 156,579 · Total population: 159,201Santa Rosa, California · Poverty rate: 9.5% · Margin of error: 0.9% · People below poverty: 16,620 · Poverty universe: 175,009 · Total population: 177,216Stamford, Connecticut · Poverty rate: 9.5% · Margin of error: 1.1% · People below poverty: 12,816 · Poverty universe: 134,458 · Total population: 135,806Menifee, California · Poverty rate: 9.6% · Margin of error: 1.7% · People below poverty: 10,199 · Poverty universe: 106,421 · Total population: 107,020Sioux Falls, South Dakota · Poverty rate: 9.6% · Margin of error: 0.9% · People below poverty: 18,596 · Poverty universe: 192,909 · Total population: 197,642Norwalk, California · Poverty rate: 9.7% · Margin of error: 1.1% · People below poverty: 9,689 · Poverty universe: 99,584 · Total population: 100,713West Covina, California · Poverty rate: 9.7% · Margin of error: 1.3% · People below poverty: 10,366 · Poverty universe: 106,533 · Total population: 107,436Aurora, Illinois · Poverty rate: 9.8% · Margin of error: 1.1% · People below poverty: 17,486 · Poverty universe: 178,129 · Total population: 179,867Cape Coral, Florida · Poverty rate: 9.8% · Margin of error: 1.2% · People below poverty: 20,175 · Poverty universe: 205,362 · Total population: 206,387South Fulton, Georgia · Poverty rate: 9.9% · Margin of error: 2.1% · People below poverty: 10,737 · Poverty universe: 108,938 · Total population: 109,157Seattle, Washington · Poverty rate: 9.9% · Margin of error: 0.4% · People below poverty: 71,260 · Poverty universe: 721,999 · Total population: 741,440Murfreesboro, Tennessee · Poverty rate: 10.0% · Margin of error: 1.2% · People below poverty: 15,354 · Poverty universe: 153,195 · Total population: 157,547Richardson, Texas · Poverty rate: 10.1% · Margin of error: 1.5% · People below poverty: 11,518 · Poverty universe: 113,978 · Total population: 118,269Pembroke Pines, Florida · Poverty rate: 10.2% · Margin of error: 1.2% · People below poverty: 17,257 · Poverty universe: 169,813 · Total population: 170,557Fontana, California · Poverty rate: 10.3% · Margin of error: 1.3% · People below poverty: 21,806 · Poverty universe: 210,950 · Total population: 211,921Elgin, Illinois · Poverty rate: 10.4% · Margin of error: 1.3% · People below poverty: 11,678 · Poverty universe: 112,185 · Total population: 114,106San Buenaventura (Ventura), California · Poverty rate: 10.4% · Margin of error: 1.3% · People below poverty: 11,302 · Poverty universe: 108,417 · Total population: 109,900Nampa, Idaho · Poverty rate: 10.5% · Margin of error: 1.4% · People below poverty: 10,859 · Poverty universe: 103,788 · Total population: 106,289Fairfield, California · Poverty rate: 10.5% · Margin of error: 1.5% · People below poverty: 12,411 · Poverty universe: 118,594 · Total population: 119,985Mesa, Arizona · Poverty rate: 10.5% · Margin of error: 0.7% · People below poverty: 52,812 · Poverty universe: 502,827 · Total population: 507,478San Francisco, California · Poverty rate: 10.6% · Margin of error: 0.4% · People below poverty: 87,135 · Poverty universe: 823,358 · Total population: 836,321Sterling Heights, Michigan · Poverty rate: 10.6% · Margin of error: 1.1% · People below poverty: 14,069 · Poverty universe: 132,610 · Total population: 133,473Billings, Montana · Poverty rate: 10.6% · Margin of error: 1.1% · People below poverty: 12,213 · Poverty universe: 115,058 · Total population: 118,321Boise City, Idaho · Poverty rate: 10.6% · Margin of error: 0.8% · People below poverty: 24,352 · Poverty universe: 229,137 · Total population: 235,701Kent, Washington · Poverty rate: 10.6% · Margin of error: 1.4% · People below poverty: 14,181 · Poverty universe: 133,382 · Total population: 135,015Manchester, New Hampshire · Poverty rate: 10.7% · Margin of error: 1.3% · People below poverty: 12,069 · Poverty universe: 112,519 · Total population: 115,415Burbank, California · Poverty rate: 10.7% · Margin of error: 1.3% · People below poverty: 11,234 · Poverty universe: 104,725 · Total population: 105,165Oxnard, California · Poverty rate: 10.8% · Margin of error: 1.0% · People below poverty: 21,528 · Poverty universe: 198,884 · Total population: 201,014Davie, Florida · Poverty rate: 10.9% · Margin of error: 1.6% · People below poverty: 11,383 · Poverty universe: 104,121 · Total population: 106,412Irving, Texas · Poverty rate: 11.0% · Margin of error: 1.1% · People below poverty: 27,770 · Poverty universe: 253,096 · Total population: 255,036Joliet, Illinois · Poverty rate: 11.0% · Margin of error: 1.1% · People below poverty: 16,204 · Poverty universe: 146,873 · Total population: 149,785Santa Ana, California · Poverty rate: 11.1% · Margin of error: 0.7% · People below poverty: 34,155 · Poverty universe: 307,920 · Total population: 311,639Vancouver, Washington · Poverty rate: 11.1% · Margin of error: 1.0% · People below poverty: 21,174 · Poverty universe: 190,634 · Total population: 192,696San Diego, California · Poverty rate: 11.1% · Margin of error: 0.4% · People below poverty: 148,864 · Poverty universe: 1,340,004 · Total population: 1,385,061Antioch, California · Poverty rate: 11.2% · Margin of error: 1.2% · People below poverty: 12,810 · Poverty universe: 114,745 · Total population: 115,759Denver, Colorado · Poverty rate: 11.2% · Margin of error: 0.5% · People below poverty: 78,668 · Poverty universe: 701,727 · Total population: 713,734Aurora, Colorado · Poverty rate: 11.2% · Margin of error: 0.8% · People below poverty: 43,554 · Poverty universe: 387,149 · Total population: 390,201Visalia, California · Poverty rate: 11.3% · Margin of error: 1.5% · People below poverty: 15,998 · Poverty universe: 141,177 · Total population: 142,649Quincy, Massachusetts · Poverty rate: 11.4% · Margin of error: 1.4% · People below poverty: 11,464 · Poverty universe: 100,391 · Total population: 101,361Raleigh, North Carolina · Poverty rate: 11.4% · Margin of error: 0.7% · People below poverty: 51,737 · Poverty universe: 452,191 · Total population: 470,763Spring Hill, Florida · Poverty rate: 11.5% · Margin of error: 1.5% · People below poverty: 13,439 · Poverty universe: 116,684 · Total population: 118,814Palm Bay, Florida · Poverty rate: 11.5% · Margin of error: 1.5% · People below poverty: 14,365 · Poverty universe: 124,411 · Total population: 125,273Jurupa Valley, California · Poverty rate: 11.6% · Margin of error: 1.5% · People below poverty: 12,204 · Poverty universe: 105,301 · Total population: 106,244Midland, Texas · Poverty rate: 11.7% · Margin of error: 1.7% · People below poverty: 15,491 · Poverty universe: 132,685 · Total population: 133,998Irvine, California · Poverty rate: 11.7% · Margin of error: 1.1% · People below poverty: 34,562 · Poverty universe: 296,029 · Total population: 308,160Charlotte, North Carolina · Poverty rate: 11.7% · Margin of error: 0.6% · People below poverty: 101,860 · Poverty universe: 871,398 · Total population: 886,283St. Petersburg, Florida · Poverty rate: 11.7% · Margin of error: 0.8% · People below poverty: 29,698 · Poverty universe: 253,828 · Total population: 260,646Cedar Rapids, Iowa · Poverty rate: 11.8% · Margin of error: 1.2% · People below poverty: 15,718 · Poverty universe: 133,349 · Total population: 136,859West Valley City, Utah · Poverty rate: 11.8% · Margin of error: 1.3% · People below poverty: 16,122 · Poverty universe: 136,256 · Total population: 137,955Moreno Valley, California · Poverty rate: 11.8% · Margin of error: 0.9% · People below poverty: 24,764 · Poverty universe: 209,037 · Total population: 210,378Urban Honolulu, Hawaii · Poverty rate: 11.9% · Margin of error: 0.8% · People below poverty: 40,048 · Poverty universe: 337,874 · Total population: 346,323Charleston, South Carolina · Poverty rate: 12.0% · Margin of error: 1.5% · People below poverty: 17,496 · Poverty universe: 146,120 · Total population: 152,014Vallejo, California · Poverty rate: 12.0% · Margin of error: 1.4% · People below poverty: 14,751 · Poverty universe: 123,113 · Total population: 124,637Grand Prairie, Texas · Poverty rate: 12.0% · Margin of error: 1.3% · People below poverty: 23,744 · Poverty universe: 197,776 · Total population: 198,564Brandon, Florida · Poverty rate: 12.0% · Margin of error: 1.5% · People below poverty: 13,618 · Poverty universe: 113,413 · Total population: 116,365Tacoma, Washington · Poverty rate: 12.0% · Margin of error: 0.9% · People below poverty: 26,004 · Poverty universe: 216,023 · Total population: 220,482Everett, Washington · Poverty rate: 12.1% · Margin of error: 1.2% · People below poverty: 13,045 · Poverty universe: 107,768 · Total population: 111,083Fullerton, California · Poverty rate: 12.2% · Margin of error: 1.5% · People below poverty: 16,916 · Poverty universe: 138,710 · Total population: 141,278Durham, North Carolina · Poverty rate: 12.2% · Margin of error: 0.8% · People below poverty: 33,919 · Poverty universe: 278,033 · Total population: 288,465Garden Grove, California · Poverty rate: 12.2% · Margin of error: 0.9% · People below poverty: 20,649 · Poverty universe: 169,189 · Total population: 170,603North Las Vegas, Nevada · Poverty rate: 12.2% · Margin of error: 0.9% · People below poverty: 32,766 · Poverty universe: 268,406 · Total population: 270,773Austin, Texas · Poverty rate: 12.3% · Margin of error: 0.6% · People below poverty: 116,068 · Poverty universe: 945,770 · Total population: 967,862Garland, Texas · Poverty rate: 12.3% · Margin of error: 1.2% · People below poverty: 29,979 · Poverty universe: 244,233 · Total population: 245,298Mesquite, Texas · Poverty rate: 12.4% · Margin of error: 1.4% · People below poverty: 18,286 · Poverty universe: 147,799 · Total population: 148,848Cambridge, Massachusetts · Poverty rate: 12.4% · Margin of error: 1.2% · People below poverty: 12,783 · Poverty universe: 102,684 · Total population: 117,794Anaheim, California · Poverty rate: 12.5% · Margin of error: 0.9% · People below poverty: 42,477 · Poverty universe: 340,579 · Total population: 344,553Reno, Nevada · Poverty rate: 12.5% · Margin of error: 0.8% · People below poverty: 32,883 · Poverty universe: 263,181 · Total population: 268,959Riverside, California · Poverty rate: 12.5% · Margin of error: 0.8% · People below poverty: 37,884 · Poverty universe: 302,610 · Total population: 316,241Rialto, California · Poverty rate: 12.6% · Margin of error: 1.8% · People below poverty: 13,004 · Poverty universe: 103,101 · Total population: 103,866Lincoln, Nebraska · Poverty rate: 12.6% · Margin of error: 0.7% · People below poverty: 35,242 · Poverty universe: 278,956 · Total population: 291,932Metairie, Louisiana · Poverty rate: 12.7% · Margin of error: 1.2% · People below poverty: 17,518 · Poverty universe: 138,379 · Total population: 138,995Gresham, Oregon · Poverty rate: 12.7% · Margin of error: 1.4% · People below poverty: 14,169 · Poverty universe: 111,898 · Total population: 112,818Ontario, California · Poverty rate: 12.7% · Margin of error: 1.2% · People below poverty: 22,441 · Poverty universe: 177,019 · Total population: 178,347Omaha, Nebraska · Poverty rate: 12.8% · Margin of error: 0.6% · People below poverty: 60,929 · Poverty universe: 477,705 · Total population: 488,197Portland, Oregon · Poverty rate: 12.8% · Margin of error: 0.5% · People below poverty: 80,373 · Poverty universe: 629,628 · Total population: 642,715Clarksville, Tennessee · Poverty rate: 12.8% · Margin of error: 1.3% · People below poverty: 21,404 · Poverty universe: 167,324 · Total population: 171,897Warren, Michigan · Poverty rate: 12.8% · Margin of error: 1.4% · People below poverty: 17,503 · Poverty universe: 136,795 · Total population: 138,128Tyler, Texas · Poverty rate: 12.8% · Margin of error: 1.5% · People below poverty: 13,141 · Poverty universe: 102,581 · Total population: 107,718Fargo, North Dakota · Poverty rate: 12.8% · Margin of error: 1.4% · People below poverty: 15,861 · Poverty universe: 123,517 · Total population: 129,064Fort Worth, Texas · Poverty rate: 12.9% · Margin of error: 0.6% · People below poverty: 118,763 · Poverty universe: 923,267 · Total population: 941,311Spokane Valley, Washington · Poverty rate: 12.9% · Margin of error: 1.5% · People below poverty: 13,407 · Poverty universe: 103,809 · Total population: 105,460Spring Valley, Nevada · Poverty rate: 12.9% · Margin of error: 1.1% · People below poverty: 28,369 · Poverty universe: 219,229 · Total population: 219,913Modesto, California · Poverty rate: 13.0% · Margin of error: 1.0% · People below poverty: 28,061 · Poverty universe: 216,347 · Total population: 218,614Hampton, Virginia · Poverty rate: 13.0% · Margin of error: 1.3% · People below poverty: 17,351 · Poverty universe: 133,087 · Total population: 137,334Arlington, Texas · Poverty rate: 13.1% · Margin of error: 1.0% · People below poverty: 50,707 · Poverty universe: 387,552 · Total population: 394,769Pasadena, California · Poverty rate: 13.2% · Margin of error: 1.3% · People below poverty: 17,670 · Poverty universe: 133,751 · Total population: 136,462Salt Lake City, Utah · Poverty rate: 13.4% · Margin of error: 0.8% · People below poverty: 26,297 · Poverty universe: 196,581 · Total population: 203,888Escondido, California · Poverty rate: 13.4% · Margin of error: 1.5% · People below poverty: 19,866 · Poverty universe: 148,184 · Total population: 149,913Hollywood, Florida · Poverty rate: 13.4% · Margin of error: 1.5% · People below poverty: 20,356 · Poverty universe: 151,517 · Total population: 152,935Glendale, California · Poverty rate: 13.4% · Margin of error: 0.9% · People below poverty: 25,647 · Poverty universe: 190,791 · Total population: 192,270Miami Gardens, Florida · Poverty rate: 13.6% · Margin of error: 1.7% · People below poverty: 14,996 · Poverty universe: 110,192 · Total population: 111,264Richmond, California · Poverty rate: 13.6% · Margin of error: 1.5% · People below poverty: 15,595 · Poverty universe: 114,288 · Total population: 115,396Oakland, California · Poverty rate: 13.7% · Margin of error: 0.6% · People below poverty: 59,338 · Poverty universe: 433,726 · Total population: 438,072Lynn, Massachusetts · Poverty rate: 13.7% · Margin of error: 1.8% · People below poverty: 13,728 · Poverty universe: 100,255 · Total population: 100,905Huntsville, Alabama · Poverty rate: 13.8% · Margin of error: 1.0% · People below poverty: 28,747 · Poverty universe: 207,855 · Total population: 218,814Brockton, Massachusetts · Poverty rate: 13.9% · Margin of error: 1.5% · People below poverty: 14,379 · Poverty universe: 103,483 · Total population: 105,080Nashville-Davidson metropolitan government (balance), Tennessee · Poverty rate: 14.1% · Margin of error: 0.6% · People below poverty: 93,727 · Poverty universe: 663,173 · Total population: 684,298Pomona, California · Poverty rate: 14.2% · Margin of error: 1.2% · People below poverty: 20,569 · Poverty universe: 145,228 · Total population: 148,391Las Vegas, Nevada · Poverty rate: 14.2% · Margin of error: 0.7% · People below poverty: 91,500 · Poverty universe: 643,613 · Total population: 650,873Salinas, California · Poverty rate: 14.2% · Margin of error: 1.8% · People below poverty: 22,844 · Poverty universe: 160,362 · Total population: 161,993Phoenix, Arizona · Poverty rate: 14.3% · Margin of error: 0.5% · People below poverty: 228,513 · Poverty universe: 1,601,164 · Total population: 1,624,832Sacramento, California · Poverty rate: 14.4% · Margin of error: 0.8% · People below poverty: 74,355 · Poverty universe: 517,504 · Total population: 524,802Odessa, Texas · Poverty rate: 14.4% · Margin of error: 2.3% · People below poverty: 16,125 · Poverty universe: 112,211 · Total population: 114,080Lakeland, Florida · Poverty rate: 14.5% · Margin of error: 1.5% · People below poverty: 15,844 · Poverty universe: 109,424 · Total population: 117,030Washington, District of Columbia · Poverty rate: 14.5% · Margin of error: 0.7% · People below poverty: 94,140 · Poverty universe: 647,874 · Total population: 672,079Spokane, Washington · Poverty rate: 14.6% · Margin of error: 1.0% · People below poverty: 32,586 · Poverty universe: 223,762 · Total population: 229,228Kansas City, Missouri · Poverty rate: 14.6% · Margin of error: 0.7% · People below poverty: 72,843 · Poverty universe: 499,963 · Total population: 508,233Palmdale, California · Poverty rate: 14.6% · Margin of error: 1.5% · People below poverty: 23,963 · Poverty universe: 164,369 · Total population: 165,487Salem, Oregon · Poverty rate: 14.7% · Margin of error: 1.2% · People below poverty: 24,772 · Poverty universe: 168,999 · Total population: 176,666Yonkers, New York · Poverty rate: 14.7% · Margin of error: 1.3% · People below poverty: 30,356 · Poverty universe: 206,964 · Total population: 209,529High Point, North Carolina · Poverty rate: 14.7% · Margin of error: 1.4% · People below poverty: 15,912 · Poverty universe: 108,285 · Total population: 115,263Greeley, Colorado · Poverty rate: 14.7% · Margin of error: 1.7% · People below poverty: 15,363 · Poverty universe: 104,224 · Total population: 109,421Abilene, Texas · Poverty rate: 14.8% · Margin of error: 1.3% · People below poverty: 17,128 · Poverty universe: 115,632 · Total population: 127,130West Palm Beach, Florida · Poverty rate: 14.8% · Margin of error: 1.6% · People below poverty: 17,139 · Poverty universe: 115,557 · Total population: 119,508Inglewood, California · Poverty rate: 14.9% · Margin of error: 1.7% · People below poverty: 15,537 · Poverty universe: 104,559 · Total population: 105,575Des Moines, Iowa · Poverty rate: 14.9% · Margin of error: 0.9% · People below poverty: 30,943 · Poverty universe: 207,905 · Total population: 212,464Long Beach, California · Poverty rate: 15.0% · Margin of error: 0.7% · People below poverty: 67,504 · Poverty universe: 451,102 · Total population: 458,491Jacksonville, Florida · Poverty rate: 15.0% · Margin of error: 0.6% · People below poverty: 141,019 · Poverty universe: 938,259 · Total population: 961,739Newport News, Virginia · Poverty rate: 15.1% · Margin of error: 1.3% · People below poverty: 26,927 · Poverty universe: 177,844 · Total population: 184,774Oklahoma City, Oklahoma · Poverty rate: 15.2% · Margin of error: 0.5% · People below poverty: 102,530 · Poverty universe: 676,661 · Total population: 688,693Fort Lauderdale, Florida · Poverty rate: 15.2% · Margin of error: 1.4% · People below poverty: 27,531 · Poverty universe: 180,692 · Total population: 183,032Pompano Beach, Florida · Poverty rate: 15.3% · Margin of error: 1.5% · People below poverty: 16,690 · Poverty universe: 109,232 · Total population: 112,212Independence, Missouri · Poverty rate: 15.3% · Margin of error: 1.8% · People below poverty: 18,418 · Poverty universe: 120,495 · Total population: 121,944Elizabeth, New Jersey · Poverty rate: 15.3% · Margin of error: 1.4% · People below poverty: 20,565 · Poverty universe: 134,429 · Total population: 135,887Stockton, California · Poverty rate: 15.4% · Margin of error: 1.0% · People below poverty: 48,496 · Poverty universe: 315,431 · Total population: 320,470Clearwater, Florida · Poverty rate: 15.4% · Margin of error: 1.8% · People below poverty: 17,732 · Poverty universe: 115,273 · Total population: 117,075Lancaster, California · Poverty rate: 15.5% · Margin of error: 1.3% · People below poverty: 25,377 · Poverty universe: 164,162 · Total population: 170,013Santa Maria, California · Poverty rate: 15.5% · Margin of error: 1.8% · People below poverty: 16,835 · Poverty universe: 108,688 · Total population: 109,880Orlando, Florida · Poverty rate: 15.5% · Margin of error: 1.2% · People below poverty: 47,860 · Poverty universe: 308,636 · Total population: 311,732North Charleston, South Carolina · Poverty rate: 15.5% · Margin of error: 1.8% · People below poverty: 17,549 · Poverty universe: 112,944 · Total population: 117,460Fort Wayne, Indiana · Poverty rate: 15.6% · Margin of error: 1.0% · People below poverty: 40,583 · Poverty universe: 260,876 · Total population: 266,235Topeka, Kansas · Poverty rate: 15.6% · Margin of error: 1.3% · People below poverty: 18,977 · Poverty universe: 121,977 · Total population: 126,103Davenport, Iowa · Poverty rate: 15.6% · Margin of error: 1.4% · People below poverty: 15,295 · Poverty universe: 98,059 · Total population: 101,083Jersey City, New Jersey · Poverty rate: 15.6% · Margin of error: 1.0% · People below poverty: 44,826 · Poverty universe: 286,962 · Total population: 289,691Indianapolis city (balance), Indiana · Poverty rate: 15.7% · Margin of error: 0.5% · People below poverty: 135,490 · Poverty universe: 864,226 · Total population: 882,043Lexington-Fayette urban county, Kentucky · Poverty rate: 15.7% · Margin of error: 0.9% · People below poverty: 48,466 · Poverty universe: 309,022 · Total population: 321,122St. Paul, Minnesota · Poverty rate: 15.7% · Margin of error: 1.0% · People below poverty: 47,145 · Poverty universe: 299,423 · Total population: 307,762Amarillo, Texas · Poverty rate: 15.8% · Margin of error: 1.2% · People below poverty: 31,389 · Poverty universe: 198,808 · Total population: 200,945Denton, Texas · Poverty rate: 15.9% · Margin of error: 1.4% · People below poverty: 21,926 · Poverty universe: 137,642 · Total population: 146,987Wichita, Kansas · Poverty rate: 15.9% · Margin of error: 0.8% · People below poverty: 62,027 · Poverty universe: 389,362 · Total population: 396,488Tampa, Florida · Poverty rate: 15.9% · Margin of error: 0.9% · People below poverty: 60,152 · Poverty universe: 377,498 · Total population: 393,389Albuquerque, New Mexico · Poverty rate: 16.0% · Margin of error: 0.7% · People below poverty: 88,830 · Poverty universe: 556,649 · Total population: 562,488Fort Collins, Colorado · Poverty rate: 16.0% · Margin of error: 1.1% · People below poverty: 25,699 · Poverty universe: 160,931 · Total population: 169,705Bakersfield, California · Poverty rate: 16.0% · Margin of error: 1.1% · People below poverty: 64,719 · Poverty universe: 404,730 · Total population: 408,366Lowell, Massachusetts · Poverty rate: 16.0% · Margin of error: 1.6% · People below poverty: 17,621 · Poverty universe: 110,106 · Total population: 114,799Louisville/Jefferson County metro government (balance), Kentucky · Poverty rate: 16.1% · Margin of error: 0.7% · People below poverty: 99,109 · Poverty universe: 614,501 · Total population: 627,210Tempe, Arizona · Poverty rate: 16.2% · Margin of error: 1.4% · People below poverty: 28,483 · Poverty universe: 176,085 · Total population: 186,419Glendale, Arizona · Poverty rate: 16.2% · Margin of error: 1.3% · People below poverty: 39,833 · Poverty universe: 245,999 · Total population: 250,193Madison, Wisconsin · Poverty rate: 16.2% · Margin of error: 0.8% · People below poverty: 42,877 · Poverty universe: 264,339 · Total population: 275,568Wilmington, North Carolina · Poverty rate: 16.3% · Margin of error: 1.3% · People below poverty: 18,638 · Poverty universe: 114,456 · Total population: 118,578Minneapolis, Minnesota · Poverty rate: 16.4% · Margin of error: 0.8% · People below poverty: 67,226 · Poverty universe: 410,811 · Total population: 426,845Little Rock, Arkansas · Poverty rate: 16.4% · Margin of error: 1.6% · People below poverty: 32,585 · Poverty universe: 198,422 · Total population: 202,739Springfield, Illinois · Poverty rate: 16.5% · Margin of error: 1.4% · People below poverty: 18,243 · Poverty universe: 110,520 · Total population: 113,714Green Bay, Wisconsin · Poverty rate: 16.5% · Margin of error: 1.6% · People below poverty: 17,158 · Poverty universe: 103,844 · Total population: 106,585Los Angeles, California · Poverty rate: 16.5% · Margin of error: 0.3% · People below poverty: 625,774 · Poverty universe: 3,782,142 · Total population: 3,857,897East Los Angeles, California · Poverty rate: 16.6% · Margin of error: 1.5% · People below poverty: 18,902 · Poverty universe: 113,905 · Total population: 114,617Berkeley, California · Poverty rate: 16.8% · Margin of error: 1.2% · People below poverty: 18,186 · Poverty universe: 108,297 · Total population: 120,223Chicago, Illinois · Poverty rate: 16.8% · Margin of error: 0.4% · People below poverty: 447,143 · Poverty universe: 2,656,986 · Total population: 2,707,648Paradise, Nevada · Poverty rate: 16.8% · Margin of error: 1.3% · People below poverty: 30,893 · Poverty universe: 183,549 · Total population: 186,178Boston, Massachusetts · Poverty rate: 16.9% · Margin of error: 0.5% · People below poverty: 105,290 · Poverty universe: 624,251 · Total population: 663,972Norman, Oklahoma · Poverty rate: 17.0% · Margin of error: 1.3% · People below poverty: 20,442 · Poverty universe: 120,331 · Total population: 128,714San Antonio, Texas · Poverty rate: 17.1% · Margin of error: 0.5% · People below poverty: 245,359 · Poverty universe: 1,433,563 · Total population: 1,458,954Killeen, Texas · Poverty rate: 17.2% · Margin of error: 1.6% · People below poverty: 26,698 · Poverty universe: 155,615 · Total population: 156,144Dallas, Texas · Poverty rate: 17.2% · Margin of error: 0.6% · People below poverty: 220,591 · Poverty universe: 1,285,291 · Total population: 1,299,553Lehigh Acres, Florida · Poverty rate: 17.2% · Margin of error: 1.8% · People below poverty: 21,838 · Poverty universe: 126,919 · Total population: 127,391El Monte, California · Poverty rate: 17.2% · Margin of error: 1.9% · People below poverty: 18,246 · Poverty universe: 105,838 · Total population: 107,066Norfolk, Virginia · Poverty rate: 17.3% · Margin of error: 1.0% · People below poverty: 37,182 · Poverty universe: 215,033 · Total population: 235,037New York, New York · Poverty rate: 17.4% · Margin of error: 0.2% · People below poverty: 1,454,320 · Poverty universe: 8,378,514 · Total population: 8,516,202Wichita Falls, Texas · Poverty rate: 17.4% · Margin of error: 2.0% · People below poverty: 15,894 · Poverty universe: 91,209 · Total population: 102,558Hesperia, California · Poverty rate: 17.5% · Margin of error: 2.1% · People below poverty: 17,374 · Poverty universe: 99,551 · Total population: 100,141Hialeah, Florida · Poverty rate: 17.5% · Margin of error: 1.1% · People below poverty: 38,609 · Poverty universe: 220,606 · Total population: 221,901Corpus Christi, Texas · Poverty rate: 17.5% · Margin of error: 1.2% · People below poverty: 54,372 · Poverty universe: 310,195 · Total population: 317,383Chattanooga, Tennessee · Poverty rate: 17.6% · Margin of error: 1.0% · People below poverty: 31,149 · Poverty universe: 176,670 · Total population: 182,832Columbus, Ohio · Poverty rate: 17.8% · Margin of error: 0.8% · People below poverty: 157,600 · Poverty universe: 882,944 · Total population: 906,480Atlanta, Georgia · Poverty rate: 17.9% · Margin of error: 0.8% · People below poverty: 83,646 · Poverty universe: 467,964 · Total population: 499,287Winston-Salem, North Carolina · Poverty rate: 17.9% · Margin of error: 1.1% · People below poverty: 43,179 · Poverty universe: 241,272 · Total population: 250,887Kansas City, Kansas · Poverty rate: 17.9% · Margin of error: 1.2% · People below poverty: 27,477 · Poverty universe: 153,160 · Total population: 154,776Fayetteville, North Carolina · Poverty rate: 18.1% · Margin of error: 1.1% · People below poverty: 34,959 · Poverty universe: 193,179 · Total population: 209,692Eugene, Oregon · Poverty rate: 18.2% · Margin of error: 1.1% · People below poverty: 31,146 · Poverty universe: 171,196 · Total population: 177,520Pasadena, Texas · Poverty rate: 18.3% · Margin of error: 1.8% · People below poverty: 27,175 · Poverty universe: 148,280 · Total population: 149,345El Paso, Texas · Poverty rate: 18.4% · Margin of error: 0.8% · People below poverty: 123,474 · Poverty universe: 671,762 · Total population: 678,147Greensboro, North Carolina · Poverty rate: 18.4% · Margin of error: 1.1% · People below poverty: 52,052 · Poverty universe: 282,758 · Total population: 298,564Evansville, Indiana · Poverty rate: 18.6% · Margin of error: 1.3% · People below poverty: 20,975 · Poverty universe: 112,720 · Total population: 116,441Grand Rapids, Michigan · Poverty rate: 18.6% · Margin of error: 1.3% · People below poverty: 35,560 · Poverty universe: 191,065 · Total population: 197,768Tulsa, Oklahoma · Poverty rate: 18.6% · Margin of error: 0.5% · People below poverty: 75,228 · Poverty universe: 403,548 · Total population: 412,322Tucson, Arizona · Poverty rate: 18.8% · Margin of error: 0.8% · People below poverty: 97,786 · Poverty universe: 519,331 · Total population: 543,348Richmond, Virginia · Poverty rate: 18.8% · Margin of error: 1.1% · People below poverty: 40,994 · Poverty universe: 217,613 · Total population: 227,595Columbus, Georgia · Poverty rate: 18.8% · Margin of error: 1.4% · People below poverty: 37,491 · Poverty universe: 198,961 · Total population: 204,383Mobile, Alabama · Poverty rate: 18.9% · Margin of error: 1.1% · People below poverty: 33,863 · Poverty universe: 179,165 · Total population: 185,097Lubbock, Texas · Poverty rate: 19.0% · Margin of error: 1.0% · People below poverty: 47,514 · Poverty universe: 249,800 · Total population: 261,078Lafayette, Louisiana · Poverty rate: 19.1% · Margin of error: 1.6% · People below poverty: 22,631 · Poverty universe: 118,406 · Total population: 121,537Pueblo, Colorado · Poverty rate: 19.2% · Margin of error: 1.5% · People below poverty: 20,564 · Poverty universe: 107,238 · Total population: 111,514Miami, Florida · Poverty rate: 19.2% · Margin of error: 0.9% · People below poverty: 84,632 · Poverty universe: 440,681 · Total population: 446,663Springfield, Missouri · Poverty rate: 19.4% · Margin of error: 1.2% · People below poverty: 30,983 · Poverty universe: 159,702 · Total population: 169,432Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania · Poverty rate: 19.5% · Margin of error: 0.9% · People below poverty: 54,689 · Poverty universe: 280,914 · Total population: 303,620Savannah, Georgia · Poverty rate: 19.5% · Margin of error: 1.2% · People below poverty: 26,819 · Poverty universe: 137,636 · Total population: 147,546San Bernardino, California · Poverty rate: 19.5% · Margin of error: 1.4% · People below poverty: 41,880 · Poverty universe: 214,408 · Total population: 221,774Houston, Texas · Poverty rate: 19.7% · Margin of error: 0.5% · People below poverty: 445,810 · Poverty universe: 2,264,308 · Total population: 2,300,419St. Louis, Missouri · Poverty rate: 19.8% · Margin of error: 1.0% · People below poverty: 56,166 · Poverty universe: 284,225 · Total population: 293,109Worcester, Massachusetts · Poverty rate: 19.8% · Margin of error: 1.2% · People below poverty: 38,069 · Poverty universe: 192,504 · Total population: 205,501Beaumont, Texas · Poverty rate: 19.8% · Margin of error: 1.7% · People below poverty: 22,070 · Poverty universe: 111,249 · Total population: 113,710New Bedford, Massachusetts · Poverty rate: 19.9% · Margin of error: 1.7% · People below poverty: 19,743 · Poverty universe: 99,399 · Total population: 100,731Lansing, Michigan · Poverty rate: 19.9% · Margin of error: 1.6% · People below poverty: 22,244 · Poverty universe: 111,664 · Total population: 112,546Victorville, California · Poverty rate: 19.9% · Margin of error: 3.0% · People below poverty: 25,909 · Poverty universe: 129,896 · Total population: 135,983Peoria, Illinois · Poverty rate: 20.0% · Margin of error: 1.8% · People below poverty: 21,653 · Poverty universe: 108,416 · Total population: 112,126Columbia, Missouri · Poverty rate: 20.0% · Margin of error: 1.4% · People below poverty: 23,516 · Poverty universe: 117,661 · Total population: 127,200El Cajon, California · Poverty rate: 20.0% · Margin of error: 2.0% · People below poverty: 20,603 · Poverty universe: 102,973 · Total population: 104,909Providence, Rhode Island · Poverty rate: 20.1% · Margin of error: 1.8% · People below poverty: 35,065 · Poverty universe: 174,871 · Total population: 190,214Baltimore, Maryland · Poverty rate: 20.1% · Margin of error: 0.8% · People below poverty: 111,877 · Poverty universe: 557,089 · Total population: 577,193McAllen, Texas · Poverty rate: 20.2% · Margin of error: 2.5% · People below poverty: 28,757 · Poverty universe: 142,615 · Total population: 143,789Sunrise Manor, Nevada · Poverty rate: 20.4% · Margin of error: 1.3% · People below poverty: 40,562 · Poverty universe: 198,440 · Total population: 199,099Knoxville, Tennessee · Poverty rate: 20.5% · Margin of error: 1.1% · People below poverty: 37,812 · Poverty universe: 184,811 · Total population: 193,721Laredo, Texas · Poverty rate: 20.8% · Margin of error: 1.5% · People below poverty: 52,537 · Poverty universe: 252,947 · Total population: 255,949Montgomery, Alabama · Poverty rate: 20.9% · Margin of error: 1.6% · People below poverty: 39,760 · Poverty universe: 190,285 · Total population: 198,440Fresno, California · Poverty rate: 20.9% · Margin of error: 0.8% · People below poverty: 111,660 · Poverty universe: 534,270 · Total population: 543,615Augusta-Richmond County consolidated government (balance), Georgia · Poverty rate: 21.1% · Margin of error: 1.4% · People below poverty: 40,429 · Poverty universe: 191,704 · Total population: 201,504Allentown, Pennsylvania · Poverty rate: 21.6% · Margin of error: 1.8% · People below poverty: 25,882 · Poverty universe: 120,030 · Total population: 125,320Boulder, Colorado · Poverty rate: 21.8% · Margin of error: 1.5% · People below poverty: 20,730 · Poverty universe: 95,070 · Total population: 106,274Rockford, Illinois · Poverty rate: 21.9% · Margin of error: 1.2% · People below poverty: 31,571 · Poverty universe: 144,358 · Total population: 147,649Las Cruces, New Mexico · Poverty rate: 22.0% · Margin of error: 2.3% · People below poverty: 24,465 · Poverty universe: 111,260 · Total population: 112,612Philadelphia, Pennsylvania · Poverty rate: 22.0% · Margin of error: 0.6% · People below poverty: 338,466 · Poverty universe: 1,538,247 · Total population: 1,582,432Chico, California · Poverty rate: 22.1% · Margin of error: 1.5% · People below poverty: 21,833 · Poverty universe: 98,868 · Total population: 102,032Provo, Utah · Poverty rate: 22.3% · Margin of error: 1.4% · People below poverty: 22,714 · Poverty universe: 101,920 · Total population: 114,303Memphis, Tennessee · Poverty rate: 22.5% · Margin of error: 1.0% · People below poverty: 138,498 · Poverty universe: 614,581 · Total population: 629,063Bridgeport, Connecticut · Poverty rate: 22.5% · Margin of error: 1.8% · People below poverty: 32,623 · Poverty universe: 144,753 · Total population: 148,012South Bend, Indiana · Poverty rate: 22.6% · Margin of error: 1.5% · People below poverty: 22,714 · Poverty universe: 100,604 · Total population: 102,866New Orleans, Louisiana · Poverty rate: 22.6% · Margin of error: 1.0% · People below poverty: 82,338 · Poverty universe: 363,814 · Total population: 376,035Akron, Ohio · Poverty rate: 22.9% · Margin of error: 1.3% · People below poverty: 42,296 · Poverty universe: 185,090 · Total population: 189,526Ann Arbor, Michigan · Poverty rate: 23.0% · Margin of error: 1.4% · People below poverty: 25,145 · Poverty universe: 109,557 · Total population: 121,179Tallahassee, Florida · Poverty rate: 23.2% · Margin of error: 1.3% · People below poverty: 42,424 · Poverty universe: 182,958 · Total population: 199,696Columbia, South Carolina · Poverty rate: 23.3% · Margin of error: 1.6% · People below poverty: 26,148 · Poverty universe: 112,456 · Total population: 138,019Milwaukee, Wisconsin · Poverty rate: 23.3% · Margin of error: 0.8% · People below poverty: 129,368 · Poverty universe: 555,150 · Total population: 569,756Albany, New York · Poverty rate: 23.4% · Margin of error: 1.7% · People below poverty: 21,137 · Poverty universe: 90,514 · Total population: 100,081Paterson, New Jersey · Poverty rate: 23.6% · Margin of error: 1.8% · People below poverty: 36,881 · Poverty universe: 156,515 · Total population: 157,660Shreveport, Louisiana · Poverty rate: 23.6% · Margin of error: 1.8% · People below poverty: 42,224 · Poverty universe: 178,757 · Total population: 183,483Tuscaloosa, Alabama · Poverty rate: 23.8% · Margin of error: 2.3% · People below poverty: 22,582 · Poverty universe: 94,908 · Total population: 107,699Waterbury, Connecticut · Poverty rate: 23.9% · Margin of error: 2.0% · People below poverty: 26,915 · Poverty universe: 112,614 · Total population: 114,356Waco, Texas · Poverty rate: 24.0% · Margin of error: 1.8% · People below poverty: 32,047 · Poverty universe: 133,702 · Total population: 141,925Dearborn, Michigan · Poverty rate: 24.3% · Margin of error: 2.1% · People below poverty: 26,094 · Poverty universe: 107,496 · Total population: 107,846Cincinnati, Ohio · Poverty rate: 24.5% · Margin of error: 1.1% · People below poverty: 72,846 · Poverty universe: 297,380 · Total population: 309,595Toledo, Ohio · Poverty rate: 24.5% · Margin of error: 1.2% · People below poverty: 64,266 · Poverty universe: 262,077 · Total population: 268,461Newark, New Jersey · Poverty rate: 24.7% · Margin of error: 1.3% · People below poverty: 72,937 · Poverty universe: 295,715 · Total population: 307,188Macon-Bibb County, Georgia · Poverty rate: 24.8% · Margin of error: 1.7% · People below poverty: 37,337 · Poverty universe: 150,343 · Total population: 156,543Brownsville, Texas · Poverty rate: 24.9% · Margin of error: 1.5% · People below poverty: 46,275 · Poverty universe: 186,205 · Total population: 188,023Baton Rouge, Louisiana · Poverty rate: 25.0% · Margin of error: 1.7% · People below poverty: 52,726 · Poverty universe: 211,069 · Total population: 223,699New Haven, Connecticut · Poverty rate: 25.0% · Margin of error: 1.8% · People below poverty: 31,269 · Poverty universe: 125,166 · Total population: 132,893Birmingham, Alabama · Poverty rate: 25.2% · Margin of error: 1.4% · People below poverty: 47,975 · Poverty universe: 190,356 · Total population: 199,322Springfield, Massachusetts · Poverty rate: 25.3% · Margin of error: 1.8% · People below poverty: 37,782 · Poverty universe: 149,578 · Total population: 154,751Hartford, Connecticut · Poverty rate: 25.5% · Margin of error: 1.8% · People below poverty: 28,959 · Poverty universe: 113,726 · Total population: 119,970Edinburg, Texas · Poverty rate: 25.7% · Margin of error: 2.9% · People below poverty: 25,147 · Poverty universe: 97,881 · Total population: 102,561Athens-Clarke County unified government (balance), Georgia · Poverty rate: 26.3% · Margin of error: 1.5% · People below poverty: 30,681 · Poverty universe: 116,607 · Total population: 126,987Rochester, New York · Poverty rate: 26.6% · Margin of error: 1.3% · People below poverty: 53,756 · Poverty universe: 201,839 · Total population: 209,720Jackson, Mississippi · Poverty rate: 26.8% · Margin of error: 1.8% · People below poverty: 38,457 · Poverty universe: 143,361 · Total population: 149,827Dayton, Ohio · Poverty rate: 27.1% · Margin of error: 1.9% · People below poverty: 33,777 · Poverty universe: 124,748 · Total population: 136,741Buffalo, New York · Poverty rate: 27.4% · Margin of error: 1.2% · People below poverty: 73,660 · Poverty universe: 269,145 · Total population: 276,397Gainesville, Florida · Poverty rate: 28.0% · Margin of error: 1.8% · People below poverty: 35,742 · Poverty universe: 127,554 · Total population: 143,611College Station, Texas · Poverty rate: 28.6% · Margin of error: 1.6% · People below poverty: 30,841 · Poverty universe: 107,975 · Total population: 122,280Syracuse, New York · Poverty rate: 29.6% · Margin of error: 1.5% · People below poverty: 38,599 · Poverty universe: 130,554 · Total population: 146,211Cleveland, Ohio · Poverty rate: 30.8% · Margin of error: 1.0% · People below poverty: 110,170 · Poverty universe: 357,560 · Total population: 367,523Detroit, Michigan · Poverty rate: 31.5% · Margin of error: 0.8% · People below poverty: 197,473 · Poverty universe: 626,667 · Total population: 636,644New YorkLos AngelesChicagoHoustonPhoenixSan FranciscoSeattleDenverDallasAtlantaMiamiBostonMinneapolisDetroitNew OrleansWashingtonPortlandLas VegasSalt Lake CityKansas CityJacksonvilleCharlotteAnchorageUrban HonoluluPoverty rate2.4%50.5%
Summary

Darker amber is a higher poverty rate. Each city is a marked point on the US state map. Alaska and Hawaii are inset. Places without a packaged map dot stay in the ranking and table. Puerto Rico cities are in the ranking and table but are not drawn here.

Among the 346 US cities with at least 100,000 residents, a typical city has a poverty rate of 13.6%, the midpoint of those 346 rates on the 2023 ACS five-year estimates, so half of these cities sit above that mark and half below. Ponce, Puerto Rico has the highest figure the Census published for this set at 50.5%, followed by San Juan, Puerto Rico at 38.8% and Bayamón, Puerto Rico at 34.0%. Among cities in the 50 states and the District of Columbia, Detroit, Michigan is highest at 31.5%. Highlands Ranch, Colorado is the lowest at 2.4%. 58 cities are at or above 20 percent. These are each city's own poverty rate for people whose poverty status was determined, not a national average of cities.

In short

13.6%typical city in this setthe middle of the 346 rates, not an average
50.5%Ponce, Puerto Ricohighest figure the Census published
31.5%Detroit, Michiganhighest among the 50 states and DC
2.4%Highlands Ranch, Coloradolowest poverty rate
58cities at or above 20%of 346 cities with 100,000 or more people
Figure 1

Poverty rate, all published cities

Poverty rate · all 346 · ranked high to low

346 items
View100%
DownloadPDFImageCSV
Poverty rate, all published citiesEvery incorporated or Census place with at least 100,000 residents, 346 in all. Ponce, Puerto Rico leads at 50.5%, then San Juan, Puerto Rico at 38.8% and Bayamón, Puerto Rico at 34.0%. Highlands Ranch, Colorado is lowest at 2.4%. The middle city sits at 13.6%. 58 cities reach 20 percent and 18 reach 25 percent. The ranking is each city's own poverty rate: people below poverty divided by people for whom poverty status is determined.0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%Poverty rate, percent50.5%Ponce, Puerto Rico38.8%San Juan, Puerto Rico34.0%Bayamón, Puerto Rico31.5%Detroit, Michigan30.8%Cleveland, Ohio29.6%Syracuse, New York28.8%Carolina, Puerto Rico28.6%College Station, Texas28.0%Gainesville, Florida27.4%Buffalo, New York27.1%Dayton, Ohio26.8%Jackson, Mississippi26.6%Rochester, New York26.3%Athens-Clarke County unifie…25.7%Edinburg, Texas25.5%Hartford, Connecticut25.3%Springfield, Massachusetts25.2%Birmingham, Alabama25.0%New Haven, Connecticut25.0%Baton Rouge, Louisiana24.9%Brownsville, Texas24.8%Macon-Bibb County, Georgia24.7%Newark, New Jersey24.5%Toledo, Ohio24.5%Cincinnati, Ohio24.3%Dearborn, Michigan24.0%Waco, Texas23.9%Waterbury, Connecticut23.8%Tuscaloosa, Alabama23.6%Shreveport, Louisiana23.6%Paterson, New Jersey23.4%Albany, New York23.3%Milwaukee, Wisconsin23.3%Columbia, South Carolina23.2%Tallahassee, Florida23.0%Ann Arbor, Michigan22.9%Akron, Ohio22.6%New Orleans, Louisiana22.6%South Bend, Indiana22.5%Bridgeport, Connecticut22.5%Memphis, Tennessee22.3%Provo, Utah22.1%Chico, California22.0%Philadelphia, Pennsylvania22.0%Las Cruces, New Mexico21.9%Rockford, Illinois21.8%Boulder, Colorado21.6%Allentown, Pennsylvania21.1%Augusta-Richmond County con…20.9%Fresno, California20.9%Montgomery, Alabama20.8%Laredo, Texas20.5%Knoxville, Tennessee20.4%Sunrise Manor, Nevada20.2%McAllen, Texas20.1%Baltimore, Maryland20.1%Providence, Rhode Island20.0%El Cajon, California20.0%Columbia, Missouri20.0%Peoria, Illinois19.9%Victorville, California19.9%Lansing, Michigan19.9%New Bedford, Massachusetts19.8%Beaumont, Texas19.8%Worcester, Massachusetts19.8%St. Louis, Missouri19.7%Houston, Texas19.5%San Bernardino, California19.5%Savannah, Georgia19.5%Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania19.4%Springfield, Missouri19.2%Miami, Florida19.2%Pueblo, Colorado19.1%Lafayette, Louisiana19.0%Lubbock, Texas18.9%Mobile, Alabama18.8%Columbus, Georgia18.8%Richmond, Virginia18.8%Tucson, Arizona18.6%Tulsa, Oklahoma18.6%Grand Rapids, Michigan18.6%Evansville, Indiana18.4%Greensboro, North Carolina18.4%El Paso, Texas18.3%Pasadena, Texas18.2%Eugene, Oregon18.1%Fayetteville, North Carolina17.9%Kansas City, Kansas17.9%Winston-Salem, North Caroli…17.9%Atlanta, Georgia17.8%Columbus, Ohio17.6%Chattanooga, Tennessee17.5%Corpus Christi, Texas17.5%Hialeah, Florida17.5%Hesperia, California17.4%Wichita Falls, Texas17.4%New York, New York17.3%Norfolk, Virginia17.2%El Monte, California17.2%Lehigh Acres, Florida17.2%Dallas, Texas17.2%Killeen, Texas17.1%San Antonio, Texas17.0%Norman, Oklahoma16.9%Boston, Massachusetts16.8%Paradise, Nevada16.8%Chicago, Illinois16.8%Berkeley, California16.6%East Los Angeles, California16.5%Los Angeles, California16.5%Green Bay, Wisconsin16.5%Springfield, Illinois16.4%Little Rock, Arkansas16.4%Minneapolis, Minnesota16.3%Wilmington, North Carolina16.2%Madison, Wisconsin16.2%Glendale, Arizona16.2%Tempe, Arizona16.1%Louisville/Jefferson County…16.0%Lowell, Massachusetts16.0%Bakersfield, California16.0%Fort Collins, Colorado16.0%Albuquerque, New Mexico15.9%Tampa, Florida15.9%Wichita, Kansas15.9%Denton, Texas15.8%Amarillo, Texas15.7%St. Paul, Minnesota15.7%Lexington-Fayette urban cou…15.7%Indianapolis city (balance)…15.6%Jersey City, New Jersey15.6%Davenport, Iowa15.6%Topeka, Kansas15.6%Fort Wayne, Indiana15.5%North Charleston, South Car…15.5%Orlando, Florida15.5%Santa Maria, California15.5%Lancaster, California15.4%Clearwater, Florida15.4%Stockton, California15.3%Elizabeth, New Jersey15.3%Independence, Missouri15.3%Pompano Beach, Florida15.2%Fort Lauderdale, Florida15.2%Oklahoma City, Oklahoma15.1%Newport News, Virginia15.0%Jacksonville, Florida15.0%Long Beach, California14.9%Des Moines, Iowa14.9%Inglewood, California14.8%West Palm Beach, Florida14.8%Abilene, Texas14.7%Greeley, Colorado14.7%High Point, North Carolina14.7%Yonkers, New York14.7%Salem, Oregon14.6%Palmdale, California14.6%Kansas City, Missouri14.6%Spokane, Washington14.5%Washington, District of Col…14.5%Lakeland, Florida14.4%Odessa, Texas14.4%Sacramento, California14.3%Phoenix, Arizona14.2%Salinas, California14.2%Las Vegas, Nevada14.2%Pomona, California14.1%Nashville-Davidson metropol…13.9%Brockton, Massachusetts13.8%Huntsville, Alabama13.7%Lynn, Massachusetts13.7%Oakland, California13.6%Richmond, California13.6%Miami Gardens, Florida13.4%Glendale, California13.4%Hollywood, Florida13.4%Escondido, California13.4%Salt Lake City, Utah13.2%Pasadena, California13.1%Arlington, Texas13.0%Hampton, Virginia13.0%Modesto, California12.9%Spring Valley, Nevada12.9%Spokane Valley, Washington12.9%Fort Worth, Texas12.8%Fargo, North Dakota12.8%Tyler, Texas12.8%Warren, Michigan12.8%Clarksville, Tennessee12.8%Portland, Oregon12.8%Omaha, Nebraska12.7%Ontario, California12.7%Gresham, Oregon12.7%Metairie, Louisiana12.6%Lincoln, Nebraska12.6%Rialto, California12.5%Riverside, California12.5%Reno, Nevada12.5%Anaheim, California12.4%Cambridge, Massachusetts12.4%Mesquite, Texas12.3%Garland, Texas12.3%Austin, Texas12.2%North Las Vegas, Nevada12.2%Garden Grove, California12.2%Durham, North Carolina12.2%Fullerton, California12.1%Everett, Washington12.0%Tacoma, Washington12.0%Brandon, Florida12.0%Grand Prairie, Texas12.0%Vallejo, California12.0%Charleston, South Carolina11.9%Urban Honolulu, Hawaii11.8%Moreno Valley, California11.8%West Valley City, Utah11.8%Cedar Rapids, Iowa11.7%St. Petersburg, Florida11.7%Charlotte, North Carolina11.7%Irvine, California11.7%Midland, Texas11.6%Jurupa Valley, California11.5%Palm Bay, Florida11.5%Spring Hill, Florida11.4%Raleigh, North Carolina11.4%Quincy, Massachusetts11.3%Visalia, California11.2%Aurora, Colorado11.2%Denver, Colorado11.2%Antioch, California11.1%San Diego, California11.1%Vancouver, Washington11.1%Santa Ana, California11.0%Joliet, Illinois11.0%Irving, Texas10.9%Davie, Florida10.8%Oxnard, California10.7%Burbank, California10.7%Manchester, New Hampshire10.6%Kent, Washington10.6%Boise City, Idaho10.6%Billings, Montana10.6%Sterling Heights, Michigan10.6%San Francisco, California10.5%Mesa, Arizona10.5%Fairfield, California10.5%Nampa, Idaho10.4%San Buenaventura (Ventura),…10.4%Elgin, Illinois10.3%Fontana, California10.2%Pembroke Pines, Florida10.1%Richardson, Texas10.0%Murfreesboro, Tennessee9.9%Seattle, Washington9.9%South Fulton, Georgia9.8%Cape Coral, Florida9.8%Aurora, Illinois9.7%West Covina, California9.7%Norwalk, California9.6%Sioux Falls, South Dakota9.6%Menifee, California9.5%Stamford, Connecticut9.5%Santa Rosa, California9.5%Hayward, California9.5%Bend, Oregon9.4%Enterprise, Nevada9.3%Colorado Springs, Colorado9.3%Anchorage, Alaska9.2%Orange, California9.1%Downey, California9.1%Lakewood, Colorado9.1%Corona, California9.1%Rochester, Minnesota9.0%Sparks, Nevada9.0%Broken Arrow, Oklahoma8.9%Costa Mesa, California8.9%Concord, California8.7%Chesapeake, Virginia8.6%Concord, North Carolina8.5%Port St. Lucie, Florida8.4%Chula Vista, California8.4%Henderson, Nevada8.4%Alexandria, Virginia8.4%Peoria, Arizona8.4%Virginia Beach, Virginia8.3%Coral Springs, Florida8.1%Hillsboro, Oregon8.1%Oceanside, California8.0%Rancho Cucamonga, California8.0%Thousand Oaks, California8.0%Miramar, Florida7.9%San Mateo, California7.8%San Jose, California7.8%Rio Rancho, New Mexico7.8%Santa Clara, California7.8%Surprise, Arizona7.8%Riverview, Florida7.8%Renton, Washington7.7%Santa Clarita, California7.7%Chandler, Arizona7.7%Round Rock, Texas7.6%Lewisville, Texas7.5%San Tan Valley, Arizona7.5%Vacaville, California7.5%Huntington Beach, California7.4%Columbia, Maryland7.4%Clovis, California7.4%Elk Grove, California7.4%Sandy Springs, Georgia7.4%Temecula, California7.3%Thornton, Colorado7.3%Bellevue, Washington7.3%Daly City, California7.1%Scottsdale, Arizona7.1%Arlington, Virginia7.1%Plano, Texas7.0%Westminster, Colorado6.9%Carlsbad, California6.9%Torrance, California6.8%Carrollton, Texas6.7%Simi Valley, California6.2%Meridian, Idaho6.2%West Jordan, Utah6.1%McKinney, Texas6.0%Arvada, Colorado6.0%Roseville, California5.9%Murrieta, California5.8%Goodyear, Arizona5.6%Sunnyvale, California5.6%Olathe, Kansas5.6%The Woodlands, Texas5.5%Lee's Summit, Missouri5.3%Cary, North Carolina5.1%Gilbert, Arizona5.1%Sugar Land, Texas5.1%Fremont, California4.9%Overland Park, Kansas4.8%Allen, Texas4.5%League City, Texas4.4%Naperville, Illinois4.2%Pearland, Texas3.7%Carmel, Indiana3.6%Fishers, Indiana3.5%Frisco, Texas3.1%Centennial, Colorado2.4%Highlands Ranch, Colorado
Summary

Every incorporated or Census place with at least 100,000 residents, 346 in all. Ponce, Puerto Rico leads at 50.5%, then San Juan, Puerto Rico at 38.8% and Bayamón, Puerto Rico at 34.0%. Highlands Ranch, Colorado is lowest at 2.4%. The middle city sits at 13.6%. 58 cities reach 20 percent and 18 reach 25 percent. The ranking is each city's own poverty rate: people below poverty divided by people for whom poverty status is determined.

Figure 2

Poverty rate against city population

Poverty rate against total population · one point per row, 346 of 346 plotted

346 items
View100%
DownloadPDFImageCSV
Poverty rate against city populationEach point is one city of 100,000 or more, 346 in all. Population and poverty rate are only loosely related: cities of similar size can sit far apart on poverty. Large cities sit to the right; higher poverty rates sit higher on the chart.0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%02,000,0004,000,0006,000,0008,000,00010,000,000Poverty rate, percentTotal population
Summary

Each point is one city of 100,000 or more, 346 in all. Population and poverty rate are only loosely related: cities of similar size can sit far apart on poverty. Large cities sit to the right; higher poverty rates sit higher on the chart.

Table 1

All cities

346 rows · 6 columns · sorted by poverty rate, high to low

346 rows
View100%
DownloadPDFImageCSV
Summary

Poverty rate, people below poverty, poverty universe and total population for every US city of 100,000 or more on the 2023 ACS five-year estimates. Sort any column or use the filter box to jump to a city by name. Each poverty rate is that city's own share of people for whom poverty status is determined, so those columns cannot be averaged into a United States figure.

All cities
?????
Ponce, Puerto Rico50.5%1.7%54,983108,943109,765
San Juan, Puerto Rico38.8%1.1%122,888316,786320,691
Bayamón, Puerto Rico34.0%1.4%55,257162,619167,312
Detroit, Michigan31.5%0.8%197,473626,667636,644
Cleveland, Ohio30.8%1.0%110,170357,560367,523
Syracuse, New York29.6%1.5%38,599130,554146,211
Carolina, Puerto Rico28.8%1.7%39,971138,570139,051
College Station, Texas28.6%1.6%30,841107,975122,280
Gainesville, Florida28.0%1.8%35,742127,554143,611
Buffalo, New York27.4%1.2%73,660269,145276,397
Dayton, Ohio27.1%1.9%33,777124,748136,741
Jackson, Mississippi26.8%1.8%38,457143,361149,827
Rochester, New York26.6%1.3%53,756201,839209,720
Athens-Clarke County unified government (balance), Georgia26.3%1.5%30,681116,607126,987
Edinburg, Texas25.7%2.9%25,14797,881102,561
Hartford, Connecticut25.5%1.8%28,959113,726119,970
Springfield, Massachusetts25.3%1.8%37,782149,578154,751
Birmingham, Alabama25.2%1.4%47,975190,356199,322
New Haven, Connecticut25.0%1.8%31,269125,166132,893
Baton Rouge, Louisiana25.0%1.7%52,726211,069223,699
Brownsville, Texas24.9%1.5%46,275186,205188,023
Macon-Bibb County, Georgia24.8%1.7%37,337150,343156,543
Newark, New Jersey24.7%1.3%72,937295,715307,188
Toledo, Ohio24.5%1.2%64,266262,077268,461
Cincinnati, Ohio24.5%1.1%72,846297,380309,595
Dearborn, Michigan24.3%2.1%26,094107,496107,846
Waco, Texas24.0%1.8%32,047133,702141,925
Waterbury, Connecticut23.9%2.0%26,915112,614114,356
Tuscaloosa, Alabama23.8%2.3%22,58294,908107,699
Shreveport, Louisiana23.6%1.8%42,224178,757183,483
Paterson, New Jersey23.6%1.8%36,881156,515157,660
Albany, New York23.4%1.7%21,13790,514100,081
Milwaukee, Wisconsin23.3%0.8%129,368555,150569,756
Columbia, South Carolina23.3%1.6%26,148112,456138,019
Tallahassee, Florida23.2%1.3%42,424182,958199,696
Ann Arbor, Michigan23.0%1.4%25,145109,557121,179
Akron, Ohio22.9%1.3%42,296185,090189,526
New Orleans, Louisiana22.6%1.0%82,338363,814376,035
South Bend, Indiana22.6%1.5%22,714100,604102,866
Bridgeport, Connecticut22.5%1.8%32,623144,753148,012
Memphis, Tennessee22.5%1.0%138,498614,581629,063
Provo, Utah22.3%1.4%22,714101,920114,303
Chico, California22.1%1.5%21,83398,868102,032
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania22.0%0.6%338,4661,538,2471,582,432
Las Cruces, New Mexico22.0%2.3%24,465111,260112,612
Rockford, Illinois21.9%1.2%31,571144,358147,649
Boulder, Colorado21.8%1.5%20,73095,070106,274
Allentown, Pennsylvania21.6%1.8%25,882120,030125,320
Augusta-Richmond County consolidated government (balance), Georgia21.1%1.4%40,429191,704201,504
Fresno, California20.9%0.8%111,660534,270543,615
Montgomery, Alabama20.9%1.6%39,760190,285198,440
Laredo, Texas20.8%1.5%52,537252,947255,949
Knoxville, Tennessee20.5%1.1%37,812184,811193,721
Sunrise Manor, Nevada20.4%1.3%40,562198,440199,099
McAllen, Texas20.2%2.5%28,757142,615143,789
Baltimore, Maryland20.1%0.8%111,877557,089577,193
Providence, Rhode Island20.1%1.8%35,065174,871190,214
El Cajon, California20.0%2.0%20,603102,973104,909
Columbia, Missouri20.0%1.4%23,516117,661127,200
Peoria, Illinois20.0%1.8%21,653108,416112,126
Victorville, California19.9%3.0%25,909129,896135,983
Lansing, Michigan19.9%1.6%22,244111,664112,546
New Bedford, Massachusetts19.9%1.7%19,74399,399100,731
Beaumont, Texas19.8%1.7%22,070111,249113,710
Worcester, Massachusetts19.8%1.2%38,069192,504205,501
St. Louis, Missouri19.8%1.0%56,166284,225293,109
Houston, Texas19.7%0.5%445,8102,264,3082,300,419
San Bernardino, California19.5%1.4%41,880214,408221,774
Savannah, Georgia19.5%1.2%26,819137,636147,546
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania19.5%0.9%54,689280,914303,620
Springfield, Missouri19.4%1.2%30,983159,702169,432
Miami, Florida19.2%0.9%84,632440,681446,663
Pueblo, Colorado19.2%1.5%20,564107,238111,514
Lafayette, Louisiana19.1%1.6%22,631118,406121,537
Lubbock, Texas19.0%1.0%47,514249,800261,078
Mobile, Alabama18.9%1.1%33,863179,165185,097
Columbus, Georgia18.8%1.4%37,491198,961204,383
Richmond, Virginia18.8%1.1%40,994217,613227,595
Tucson, Arizona18.8%0.8%97,786519,331543,348
Tulsa, Oklahoma18.6%0.5%75,228403,548412,322
Grand Rapids, Michigan18.6%1.3%35,560191,065197,768
Evansville, Indiana18.6%1.3%20,975112,720116,441
Greensboro, North Carolina18.4%1.1%52,052282,758298,564
El Paso, Texas18.4%0.8%123,474671,762678,147
Pasadena, Texas18.3%1.8%27,175148,280149,345
Eugene, Oregon18.2%1.1%31,146171,196177,520
Fayetteville, North Carolina18.1%1.1%34,959193,179209,692
Kansas City, Kansas17.9%1.2%27,477153,160154,776
Winston-Salem, North Carolina17.9%1.1%43,179241,272250,887
Atlanta, Georgia17.9%0.8%83,646467,964499,287
Columbus, Ohio17.8%0.8%157,600882,944906,480
Chattanooga, Tennessee17.6%1.0%31,149176,670182,832
Corpus Christi, Texas17.5%1.2%54,372310,195317,383
Hialeah, Florida17.5%1.1%38,609220,606221,901
Hesperia, California17.5%2.1%17,37499,551100,141
Wichita Falls, Texas17.4%2.0%15,89491,209102,558
New York, New York17.4%0.2%1,454,3208,378,5148,516,202
Norfolk, Virginia17.3%1.0%37,182215,033235,037
El Monte, California17.2%1.9%18,246105,838107,066
Lehigh Acres, Florida17.2%1.8%21,838126,919127,391
Dallas, Texas17.2%0.6%220,5911,285,2911,299,553
Killeen, Texas17.2%1.6%26,698155,615156,144
San Antonio, Texas17.1%0.5%245,3591,433,5631,458,954
Norman, Oklahoma17.0%1.3%20,442120,331128,714
Boston, Massachusetts16.9%0.5%105,290624,251663,972
Paradise, Nevada16.8%1.3%30,893183,549186,178
Chicago, Illinois16.8%0.4%447,1432,656,9862,707,648
Berkeley, California16.8%1.2%18,186108,297120,223
East Los Angeles, California16.6%1.5%18,902113,905114,617
Los Angeles, California16.5%0.3%625,7743,782,1423,857,897
Green Bay, Wisconsin16.5%1.6%17,158103,844106,585
Springfield, Illinois16.5%1.4%18,243110,520113,714
Little Rock, Arkansas16.4%1.6%32,585198,422202,739
Minneapolis, Minnesota16.4%0.8%67,226410,811426,845
Wilmington, North Carolina16.3%1.3%18,638114,456118,578
Madison, Wisconsin16.2%0.8%42,877264,339275,568
Glendale, Arizona16.2%1.3%39,833245,999250,193
Tempe, Arizona16.2%1.4%28,483176,085186,419
Louisville/Jefferson County metro government (balance), Kentucky16.1%0.7%99,109614,501627,210
Lowell, Massachusetts16.0%1.6%17,621110,106114,799
Bakersfield, California16.0%1.1%64,719404,730408,366
Fort Collins, Colorado16.0%1.1%25,699160,931169,705
Albuquerque, New Mexico16.0%0.7%88,830556,649562,488
Tampa, Florida15.9%0.9%60,152377,498393,389
Wichita, Kansas15.9%0.8%62,027389,362396,488
Denton, Texas15.9%1.4%21,926137,642146,987
Amarillo, Texas15.8%1.2%31,389198,808200,945
St. Paul, Minnesota15.7%1.0%47,145299,423307,762
Lexington-Fayette urban county, Kentucky15.7%0.9%48,466309,022321,122
Indianapolis city (balance), Indiana15.7%0.5%135,490864,226882,043
Jersey City, New Jersey15.6%1.0%44,826286,962289,691
Davenport, Iowa15.6%1.4%15,29598,059101,083
Topeka, Kansas15.6%1.3%18,977121,977126,103
Fort Wayne, Indiana15.6%1.0%40,583260,876266,235
North Charleston, South Carolina15.5%1.8%17,549112,944117,460
Orlando, Florida15.5%1.2%47,860308,636311,732
Santa Maria, California15.5%1.8%16,835108,688109,880
Lancaster, California15.5%1.3%25,377164,162170,013
Clearwater, Florida15.4%1.8%17,732115,273117,075
Stockton, California15.4%1.0%48,496315,431320,470
Elizabeth, New Jersey15.3%1.4%20,565134,429135,887
Independence, Missouri15.3%1.8%18,418120,495121,944
Pompano Beach, Florida15.3%1.5%16,690109,232112,212
Fort Lauderdale, Florida15.2%1.4%27,531180,692183,032
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma15.2%0.5%102,530676,661688,693
Newport News, Virginia15.1%1.3%26,927177,844184,774
Jacksonville, Florida15.0%0.6%141,019938,259961,739
Long Beach, California15.0%0.7%67,504451,102458,491
Des Moines, Iowa14.9%0.9%30,943207,905212,464
Inglewood, California14.9%1.7%15,537104,559105,575
West Palm Beach, Florida14.8%1.6%17,139115,557119,508
Abilene, Texas14.8%1.3%17,128115,632127,130
Greeley, Colorado14.7%1.7%15,363104,224109,421
High Point, North Carolina14.7%1.4%15,912108,285115,263
Yonkers, New York14.7%1.3%30,356206,964209,529
Salem, Oregon14.7%1.2%24,772168,999176,666
Palmdale, California14.6%1.5%23,963164,369165,487
Kansas City, Missouri14.6%0.7%72,843499,963508,233
Spokane, Washington14.6%1.0%32,586223,762229,228
Washington, District of Columbia14.5%0.7%94,140647,874672,079
Lakeland, Florida14.5%1.5%15,844109,424117,030
Odessa, Texas14.4%2.3%16,125112,211114,080
Sacramento, California14.4%0.8%74,355517,504524,802
Phoenix, Arizona14.3%0.5%228,5131,601,1641,624,832
Salinas, California14.2%1.8%22,844160,362161,993
Las Vegas, Nevada14.2%0.7%91,500643,613650,873
Pomona, California14.2%1.2%20,569145,228148,391
Nashville-Davidson metropolitan government (balance), Tennessee14.1%0.6%93,727663,173684,298
Brockton, Massachusetts13.9%1.5%14,379103,483105,080
Huntsville, Alabama13.8%1.0%28,747207,855218,814
Lynn, Massachusetts13.7%1.8%13,728100,255100,905
Oakland, California13.7%0.6%59,338433,726438,072
Richmond, California13.6%1.5%15,595114,288115,396
Miami Gardens, Florida13.6%1.7%14,996110,192111,264
Glendale, California13.4%0.9%25,647190,791192,270
Hollywood, Florida13.4%1.5%20,356151,517152,935
Escondido, California13.4%1.5%19,866148,184149,913
Salt Lake City, Utah13.4%0.8%26,297196,581203,888
Pasadena, California13.2%1.3%17,670133,751136,462
Arlington, Texas13.1%1.0%50,707387,552394,769
Hampton, Virginia13.0%1.3%17,351133,087137,334
Modesto, California13.0%1.0%28,061216,347218,614
Spring Valley, Nevada12.9%1.1%28,369219,229219,913
Spokane Valley, Washington12.9%1.5%13,407103,809105,460
Fort Worth, Texas12.9%0.6%118,763923,267941,311
Fargo, North Dakota12.8%1.4%15,861123,517129,064
Tyler, Texas12.8%1.5%13,141102,581107,718
Warren, Michigan12.8%1.4%17,503136,795138,128
Clarksville, Tennessee12.8%1.3%21,404167,324171,897
Portland, Oregon12.8%0.5%80,373629,628642,715
Omaha, Nebraska12.8%0.6%60,929477,705488,197
Ontario, California12.7%1.2%22,441177,019178,347
Gresham, Oregon12.7%1.4%14,169111,898112,818
Metairie, Louisiana12.7%1.2%17,518138,379138,995
Lincoln, Nebraska12.6%0.7%35,242278,956291,932
Rialto, California12.6%1.8%13,004103,101103,866
Riverside, California12.5%0.8%37,884302,610316,241
Reno, Nevada12.5%0.8%32,883263,181268,959
Anaheim, California12.5%0.9%42,477340,579344,553
Cambridge, Massachusetts12.4%1.2%12,783102,684117,794
Mesquite, Texas12.4%1.4%18,286147,799148,848
Garland, Texas12.3%1.2%29,979244,233245,298
Austin, Texas12.3%0.6%116,068945,770967,862
North Las Vegas, Nevada12.2%0.9%32,766268,406270,773
Garden Grove, California12.2%0.9%20,649169,189170,603
Durham, North Carolina12.2%0.8%33,919278,033288,465
Fullerton, California12.2%1.5%16,916138,710141,278
Everett, Washington12.1%1.2%13,045107,768111,083
Tacoma, Washington12.0%0.9%26,004216,023220,482
Brandon, Florida12.0%1.5%13,618113,413116,365
Grand Prairie, Texas12.0%1.3%23,744197,776198,564
Vallejo, California12.0%1.4%14,751123,113124,637
Charleston, South Carolina12.0%1.5%17,496146,120152,014
Urban Honolulu, Hawaii11.9%0.8%40,048337,874346,323
Moreno Valley, California11.8%0.9%24,764209,037210,378
West Valley City, Utah11.8%1.3%16,122136,256137,955
Cedar Rapids, Iowa11.8%1.2%15,718133,349136,859
St. Petersburg, Florida11.7%0.8%29,698253,828260,646
Charlotte, North Carolina11.7%0.6%101,860871,398886,283
Irvine, California11.7%1.1%34,562296,029308,160
Midland, Texas11.7%1.7%15,491132,685133,998
Jurupa Valley, California11.6%1.5%12,204105,301106,244
Palm Bay, Florida11.5%1.5%14,365124,411125,273
Spring Hill, Florida11.5%1.5%13,439116,684118,814
Raleigh, North Carolina11.4%0.7%51,737452,191470,763
Quincy, Massachusetts11.4%1.4%11,464100,391101,361
Visalia, California11.3%1.5%15,998141,177142,649
Aurora, Colorado11.2%0.8%43,554387,149390,201
Denver, Colorado11.2%0.5%78,668701,727713,734
Antioch, California11.2%1.2%12,810114,745115,759
San Diego, California11.1%0.4%148,8641,340,0041,385,061
Vancouver, Washington11.1%1.0%21,174190,634192,696
Santa Ana, California11.1%0.7%34,155307,920311,639
Joliet, Illinois11.0%1.1%16,204146,873149,785
Irving, Texas11.0%1.1%27,770253,096255,036
Davie, Florida10.9%1.6%11,383104,121106,412
Oxnard, California10.8%1.0%21,528198,884201,014
Burbank, California10.7%1.3%11,234104,725105,165
Manchester, New Hampshire10.7%1.3%12,069112,519115,415
Kent, Washington10.6%1.4%14,181133,382135,015
Boise City, Idaho10.6%0.8%24,352229,137235,701
Billings, Montana10.6%1.1%12,213115,058118,321
Sterling Heights, Michigan10.6%1.1%14,069132,610133,473
San Francisco, California10.6%0.4%87,135823,358836,321
Mesa, Arizona10.5%0.7%52,812502,827507,478
Fairfield, California10.5%1.5%12,411118,594119,985
Nampa, Idaho10.5%1.4%10,859103,788106,289
San Buenaventura (Ventura), California10.4%1.3%11,302108,417109,900
Elgin, Illinois10.4%1.3%11,678112,185114,106
Fontana, California10.3%1.3%21,806210,950211,921
Pembroke Pines, Florida10.2%1.2%17,257169,813170,557
Richardson, Texas10.1%1.5%11,518113,978118,269
Murfreesboro, Tennessee10.0%1.2%15,354153,195157,547
Seattle, Washington9.9%0.4%71,260721,999741,440
South Fulton, Georgia9.9%2.1%10,737108,938109,157
Cape Coral, Florida9.8%1.2%20,175205,362206,387
Aurora, Illinois9.8%1.1%17,486178,129179,867
West Covina, California9.7%1.3%10,366106,533107,436
Norwalk, California9.7%1.1%9,68999,584100,713
Sioux Falls, South Dakota9.6%0.9%18,596192,909197,642
Menifee, California9.6%1.7%10,199106,421107,020
Stamford, Connecticut9.5%1.1%12,816134,458135,806
Santa Rosa, California9.5%0.9%16,620175,009177,216
Hayward, California9.5%1.0%14,820156,579159,201
Bend, Oregon9.5%1.4%9,556100,999101,472
Enterprise, Nevada9.4%1.0%21,820231,325232,043
Colorado Springs, Colorado9.3%0.6%44,137474,212483,099
Anchorage, Alaska9.3%0.7%26,226282,916289,069
Orange, California9.2%1.4%12,185133,116138,723
Downey, California9.1%1.3%10,146110,962111,793
Lakewood, Colorado9.1%0.9%14,030153,842156,309
Corona, California9.1%1.2%14,308157,892158,839
Rochester, Minnesota9.1%1.2%10,772119,003121,638
Sparks, Nevada9.0%1.3%9,769108,349109,106
Broken Arrow, Oklahoma9.0%0.9%10,351115,079115,919
Costa Mesa, California8.9%1.0%9,812109,711110,538
Concord, California8.9%1.2%10,943123,229124,260
Chesapeake, Virginia8.7%1.0%21,444246,733251,153
Concord, North Carolina8.6%1.5%9,058105,097106,518
Port St. Lucie, Florida8.5%1.3%18,643219,188220,453
Chula Vista, California8.4%0.9%23,005273,106275,030
Henderson, Nevada8.4%0.7%27,110322,369324,523
Alexandria, Virginia8.4%0.9%13,037155,067156,788
Peoria, Arizona8.4%0.9%16,164192,289194,338
Virginia Beach, Virginia8.4%0.6%37,541448,753457,066
Coral Springs, Florida8.3%1.4%11,015133,275133,962
Hillsboro, Oregon8.1%1.3%8,634105,960107,050
Oceanside, California8.1%0.9%13,953171,492172,542
Rancho Cucamonga, California8.0%0.9%13,769171,527174,693
Thousand Oaks, California8.0%1.3%9,924123,637125,676
Miramar, Florida8.0%1.4%10,767135,343135,986
San Mateo, California7.9%1.0%8,152102,665103,555
San Jose, California7.8%0.4%76,869979,386990,054
Rio Rancho, New Mexico7.8%1.2%8,306105,981106,533
Santa Clara, California7.8%1.0%9,810125,303129,239
Surprise, Arizona7.8%1.2%11,589148,752149,519
Riverview, Florida7.8%1.5%8,371107,485107,776
Renton, Washington7.8%1.0%8,122104,633105,279
Santa Clarita, California7.7%1.0%17,583227,164229,021
Chandler, Arizona7.7%0.8%21,184276,343278,123
Round Rock, Texas7.7%1.2%9,466123,502124,288
Lewisville, Texas7.6%1.1%9,696127,582128,313
San Tan Valley, Arizona7.5%1.5%7,914104,838105,231
Vacaville, California7.5%1.5%7,15995,802102,085
Huntington Beach, California7.5%0.8%14,531194,966196,010
Columbia, Maryland7.4%1.2%7,847105,406105,871
Clovis, California7.4%1.1%9,040121,557122,719
Elk Grove, California7.4%1.1%13,091176,784177,221
Sandy Springs, Georgia7.4%1.4%7,892106,657107,198
Temecula, California7.4%1.2%8,123109,825110,404
Thornton, Colorado7.3%1.2%10,345141,623142,878
Bellevue, Washington7.3%1.1%10,954150,638151,199
Daly City, California7.3%1.0%7,394101,949102,560
Scottsdale, Arizona7.1%0.8%17,156240,450242,169
Arlington, Virginia7.1%0.6%16,573232,638235,463
Plano, Texas7.1%0.7%20,345286,199287,339
Westminster, Colorado7.0%0.9%8,107115,059115,546
Carlsbad, California6.9%1.6%7,905113,917114,500
Torrance, California6.9%1.0%9,817142,274143,499
Carrollton, Texas6.8%1.1%9,050132,173132,741
Simi Valley, California6.7%0.9%8,363125,095125,769
Meridian, Idaho6.2%1.1%7,733124,092124,865
West Jordan, Utah6.2%1.2%7,155115,691116,277
McKinney, Texas6.1%0.9%12,155200,173202,314
Arvada, Colorado6.0%0.9%7,291122,208122,835
Roseville, California6.0%0.8%9,024151,523152,438
Murrieta, California5.9%1.1%6,591111,009111,621
Goodyear, Arizona5.8%1.1%5,65697,803102,891
Sunnyvale, California5.6%0.6%8,529152,408153,455
Olathe, Kansas5.6%0.8%7,935141,909143,720
The Woodlands, Texas5.6%1.2%6,494116,307116,916
Lee's Summit, Missouri5.5%1.1%5,586101,635102,583
Cary, North Carolina5.3%0.8%9,309176,287176,686
Gilbert, Arizona5.1%0.6%13,827269,453271,118
Sugar Land, Texas5.1%0.9%5,603109,571109,735
Fremont, California5.1%0.6%11,541227,299228,518
Overland Park, Kansas4.9%0.6%9,533195,763197,199
Allen, Texas4.8%1.1%5,187107,173107,684
League City, Texas4.5%0.7%5,157114,159114,885
Naperville, Illinois4.4%0.7%6,401146,839149,424
Pearland, Texas4.2%0.9%5,291125,158125,983
Carmel, Indiana3.7%0.8%3,73899,894100,501
Fishers, Indiana3.6%0.9%3,579100,433100,918
Frisco, Texas3.5%0.7%7,415209,491210,238
Centennial, Colorado3.1%0.5%3,339106,105107,386
Highlands Ranch, Colorado2.4%0.5%2,437101,224101,437

Image files

Download all

Figure 2

Poverty rate, all published cities

Figure 2: Poverty rate, all published cities
DownloadPDFImageCSV

Figure 3

Poverty rate against city population

Figure 3: Poverty rate against city population
DownloadPDFImageCSV

About this data

  • Poverty status is determined for most people living in housing units. It is not determined for people in institutional group quarters such as prisons and nursing homes, or for people in college dormitories or military barracks.
  • A city poverty rate is that city's own share of people below the poverty line, so these figures cannot be averaged to produce a national figure. A midpoint of city rates is not the US poverty rate.
  • Only Census places with at least 100,000 residents on the 2023 ACS five-year total population estimate (table B01003) are included. Smaller places are left out.
  • Puerto Rico places that meet the population cutoff are in the ranking and table. Alaska and Hawaii cities appear on the ranking; on the map they are shown in inset when a packaged city dot exists.
  • Places without a packaged map dot stay in the ranking and table.
  • Some margins of error are ACS controlled-estimate sentinels (for example ***** / −555,555,555) rather than ordinary sampling errors. Those values are stored as missing and shown as a dash.