Unemployment rate by US city

Summary

Unemployment rate, US cities

Unemployment rate by city · all 346 cities · hover or tap a city for every figure on this page

346 items
View100%
DownloadPDFImageCSV
CitiesDetroit, Michigan
Unemployment rate, US citiesDarker amber is a higher unemployment rate. Each city is a marked point on the US state map. Alaska and Hawaii are inset. Places without a packaged map dot stay in the ranking and table. Puerto Rico cities are in the ranking and table but are not drawn here.Sioux Falls, South Dakota · Unemployment rate: 2.3% · Margin of error: 0.4% · Unemployed: 2,627 · Civilian labor force: 114,082 · Employed: 111,455 · In labor force: 114,306 · Not in labor force: 39,288 · Population 16 years and over: 153,594 · Total population: 197,642Meridian, Idaho · Unemployment rate: 2.4% · Margin of error: 0.5% · Unemployed: 1,592 · Civilian labor force: 66,062 · Employed: 64,470 · In labor force: 66,317 · Not in labor force: 28,880 · Population 16 years and over: 95,197 · Total population: 124,865Madison, Wisconsin · Unemployment rate: 2.7% · Margin of error: 0.3% · Unemployed: 4,429 · Civilian labor force: 165,351 · Employed: 160,922 · In labor force: 165,552 · Not in labor force: 69,169 · Population 16 years and over: 234,721 · Total population: 275,568Abilene, Texas · Unemployment rate: 2.7% · Margin of error: 0.6% · Unemployed: 1,563 · Civilian labor force: 57,850 · Employed: 56,287 · In labor force: 62,637 · Not in labor force: 38,169 · Population 16 years and over: 100,806 · Total population: 127,130Carmel, Indiana · Unemployment rate: 2.7% · Margin of error: 0.7% · Unemployed: 1,493 · Civilian labor force: 54,881 · Employed: 53,388 · In labor force: 54,967 · Not in labor force: 23,875 · Population 16 years and over: 78,842 · Total population: 100,501Nampa, Idaho · Unemployment rate: 2.8% · Margin of error: 0.5% · Unemployed: 1,520 · Civilian labor force: 54,542 · Employed: 53,022 · In labor force: 54,625 · Not in labor force: 27,837 · Population 16 years and over: 82,462 · Total population: 106,289Olathe, Kansas · Unemployment rate: 2.8% · Margin of error: 0.6% · Unemployed: 2,260 · Civilian labor force: 80,376 · Employed: 78,116 · In labor force: 80,780 · Not in labor force: 29,443 · Population 16 years and over: 110,223 · Total population: 143,720Fishers, Indiana · Unemployment rate: 2.8% · Margin of error: 1.0% · Unemployed: 1,590 · Civilian labor force: 56,153 · Employed: 54,563 · In labor force: 56,638 · Not in labor force: 20,095 · Population 16 years and over: 76,733 · Total population: 100,918Pearland, Texas · Unemployment rate: 3.1% · Margin of error: 0.9% · Unemployed: 1,999 · Civilian labor force: 65,218 · Employed: 63,219 · In labor force: 65,533 · Not in labor force: 29,633 · Population 16 years and over: 95,166 · Total population: 125,983Carrollton, Texas · Unemployment rate: 3.2% · Margin of error: 0.5% · Unemployed: 2,564 · Civilian labor force: 80,980 · Employed: 78,416 · In labor force: 81,084 · Not in labor force: 28,289 · Population 16 years and over: 109,373 · Total population: 132,741Arlington, Virginia · Unemployment rate: 3.3% · Margin of error: 0.4% · Unemployed: 4,913 · Civilian labor force: 150,497 · Employed: 145,584 · In labor force: 153,952 · Not in labor force: 43,404 · Population 16 years and over: 197,356 · Total population: 235,463Lincoln, Nebraska · Unemployment rate: 3.3% · Margin of error: 0.4% · Unemployed: 5,391 · Civilian labor force: 164,604 · Employed: 159,213 · In labor force: 165,049 · Not in labor force: 69,970 · Population 16 years and over: 235,019 · Total population: 291,932Gilbert, Arizona · Unemployment rate: 3.3% · Margin of error: 0.5% · Unemployed: 4,841 · Civilian labor force: 146,006 · Employed: 141,165 · In labor force: 146,061 · Not in labor force: 56,720 · Population 16 years and over: 202,781 · Total population: 271,118Alexandria, Virginia · Unemployment rate: 3.4% · Margin of error: 0.5% · Unemployed: 3,315 · Civilian labor force: 98,916 · Employed: 95,601 · In labor force: 102,280 · Not in labor force: 28,439 · Population 16 years and over: 130,719 · Total population: 156,788Cambridge, Massachusetts · Unemployment rate: 3.4% · Margin of error: 0.6% · Unemployed: 2,448 · Civilian labor force: 72,853 · Employed: 70,405 · In labor force: 73,004 · Not in labor force: 32,011 · Population 16 years and over: 105,015 · Total population: 117,794Cary, North Carolina · Unemployment rate: 3.4% · Margin of error: 0.5% · Unemployed: 3,257 · Civilian labor force: 96,789 · Employed: 93,532 · In labor force: 96,944 · Not in labor force: 43,132 · Population 16 years and over: 140,076 · Total population: 176,686Overland Park, Kansas · Unemployment rate: 3.4% · Margin of error: 0.5% · Unemployed: 3,837 · Civilian labor force: 113,712 · Employed: 109,875 · In labor force: 113,927 · Not in labor force: 45,124 · Population 16 years and over: 159,051 · Total population: 197,199Charleston, South Carolina · Unemployment rate: 3.4% · Margin of error: 0.7% · Unemployed: 2,920 · Civilian labor force: 85,729 · Employed: 82,809 · In labor force: 87,105 · Not in labor force: 41,167 · Population 16 years and over: 128,272 · Total population: 152,014Scottsdale, Arizona · Unemployment rate: 3.4% · Margin of error: 0.4% · Unemployed: 4,482 · Civilian labor force: 130,545 · Employed: 126,063 · In labor force: 130,613 · Not in labor force: 81,646 · Population 16 years and over: 212,259 · Total population: 242,169McKinney, Texas · Unemployment rate: 3.5% · Margin of error: 0.6% · Unemployed: 3,772 · Civilian labor force: 109,240 · Employed: 105,468 · In labor force: 109,285 · Not in labor force: 43,827 · Population 16 years and over: 153,112 · Total population: 202,314Wichita Falls, Texas · Unemployment rate: 3.5% · Margin of error: 0.6% · Unemployed: 1,643 · Civilian labor force: 47,544 · Employed: 45,901 · In labor force: 52,493 · Not in labor force: 29,469 · Population 16 years and over: 81,962 · Total population: 102,558Peoria, Arizona · Unemployment rate: 3.5% · Margin of error: 0.5% · Unemployed: 3,297 · Civilian labor force: 95,167 · Employed: 91,870 · In labor force: 95,344 · Not in labor force: 60,846 · Population 16 years and over: 156,190 · Total population: 194,338Billings, Montana · Unemployment rate: 3.5% · Margin of error: 0.6% · Unemployed: 2,181 · Civilian labor force: 62,604 · Employed: 60,423 · In labor force: 62,614 · Not in labor force: 32,037 · Population 16 years and over: 94,651 · Total population: 118,321Murfreesboro, Tennessee · Unemployment rate: 3.6% · Margin of error: 0.6% · Unemployed: 3,212 · Civilian labor force: 90,203 · Employed: 86,991 · In labor force: 90,412 · Not in labor force: 34,885 · Population 16 years and over: 125,297 · Total population: 157,547Ann Arbor, Michigan · Unemployment rate: 3.6% · Margin of error: 0.6% · Unemployed: 2,330 · Civilian labor force: 65,218 · Employed: 62,888 · In labor force: 65,367 · Not in labor force: 41,956 · Population 16 years and over: 107,323 · Total population: 121,179Amarillo, Texas · Unemployment rate: 3.6% · Margin of error: 0.6% · Unemployed: 3,580 · Civilian labor force: 99,762 · Employed: 96,182 · In labor force: 100,163 · Not in labor force: 53,948 · Population 16 years and over: 154,111 · Total population: 200,945League City, Texas · Unemployment rate: 3.6% · Margin of error: 0.8% · Unemployed: 2,182 · Civilian labor force: 60,774 · Employed: 58,592 · In labor force: 61,079 · Not in labor force: 26,952 · Population 16 years and over: 88,031 · Total population: 114,885Round Rock, Texas · Unemployment rate: 3.6% · Margin of error: 0.7% · Unemployed: 2,551 · Civilian labor force: 70,984 · Employed: 68,433 · In labor force: 71,096 · Not in labor force: 27,497 · Population 16 years and over: 98,593 · Total population: 124,288Midland, Texas · Unemployment rate: 3.6% · Margin of error: 0.9% · Unemployed: 2,471 · Civilian labor force: 68,648 · Employed: 66,177 · In labor force: 68,811 · Not in labor force: 29,373 · Population 16 years and over: 98,184 · Total population: 133,998Chandler, Arizona · Unemployment rate: 3.6% · Margin of error: 0.4% · Unemployed: 5,699 · Civilian labor force: 157,225 · Employed: 151,526 · In labor force: 157,347 · Not in labor force: 63,562 · Population 16 years and over: 220,909 · Total population: 278,123Centennial, Colorado · Unemployment rate: 3.7% · Margin of error: 0.8% · Unemployed: 2,192 · Civilian labor force: 60,040 · Employed: 57,848 · In labor force: 60,210 · Not in labor force: 26,352 · Population 16 years and over: 86,562 · Total population: 107,386Highlands Ranch, Colorado · Unemployment rate: 3.7% · Margin of error: 0.6% · Unemployed: 2,088 · Civilian labor force: 57,081 · Employed: 54,993 · In labor force: 57,599 · Not in labor force: 22,721 · Population 16 years and over: 80,320 · Total population: 101,437Hialeah, Florida · Unemployment rate: 3.7% · Margin of error: 0.4% · Unemployed: 4,319 · Civilian labor force: 116,642 · Employed: 112,323 · In labor force: 116,721 · Not in labor force: 72,277 · Population 16 years and over: 188,998 · Total population: 221,901Bend, Oregon · Unemployment rate: 3.7% · Margin of error: 0.7% · Unemployed: 2,105 · Civilian labor force: 56,589 · Employed: 54,484 · In labor force: 56,644 · Not in labor force: 26,794 · Population 16 years and over: 83,438 · Total population: 101,472Lewisville, Texas · Unemployment rate: 3.7% · Margin of error: 0.7% · Unemployed: 2,869 · Civilian labor force: 76,931 · Employed: 74,062 · In labor force: 77,046 · Not in labor force: 24,800 · Population 16 years and over: 101,846 · Total population: 128,313Sandy Springs, Georgia · Unemployment rate: 3.7% · Margin of error: 0.9% · Unemployed: 2,498 · Civilian labor force: 66,680 · Employed: 64,182 · In labor force: 66,796 · Not in labor force: 23,342 · Population 16 years and over: 90,138 · Total population: 107,198Westminster, Colorado · Unemployment rate: 3.8% · Margin of error: 0.8% · Unemployed: 2,613 · Civilian labor force: 69,639 · Employed: 67,026 · In labor force: 69,838 · Not in labor force: 25,785 · Population 16 years and over: 95,623 · Total population: 115,546Boise City, Idaho · Unemployment rate: 3.8% · Margin of error: 0.7% · Unemployed: 5,108 · Civilian labor force: 135,136 · Employed: 130,028 · In labor force: 135,626 · Not in labor force: 62,015 · Population 16 years and over: 197,641 · Total population: 235,701Salt Lake City, Utah · Unemployment rate: 3.8% · Margin of error: 0.4% · Unemployed: 4,819 · Civilian labor force: 126,093 · Employed: 121,274 · In labor force: 126,178 · Not in labor force: 46,911 · Population 16 years and over: 173,089 · Total population: 203,888Manchester, New Hampshire · Unemployment rate: 3.8% · Margin of error: 1.0% · Unemployed: 2,684 · Civilian labor force: 69,866 · Employed: 67,182 · In labor force: 69,979 · Not in labor force: 27,330 · Population 16 years and over: 97,309 · Total population: 115,415Rochester, Minnesota · Unemployment rate: 3.8% · Margin of error: 0.7% · Unemployed: 2,604 · Civilian labor force: 67,761 · Employed: 65,157 · In labor force: 67,801 · Not in labor force: 28,180 · Population 16 years and over: 95,981 · Total population: 121,638Fargo, North Dakota · Unemployment rate: 3.9% · Margin of error: 0.7% · Unemployed: 3,053 · Civilian labor force: 79,095 · Employed: 76,042 · In labor force: 79,516 · Not in labor force: 26,536 · Population 16 years and over: 106,052 · Total population: 129,064Arvada, Colorado · Unemployment rate: 3.9% · Margin of error: 0.6% · Unemployed: 2,805 · Civilian labor force: 72,091 · Employed: 69,286 · In labor force: 72,105 · Not in labor force: 28,920 · Population 16 years and over: 101,025 · Total population: 122,835Columbia, Missouri · Unemployment rate: 3.9% · Margin of error: 0.8% · Unemployed: 2,696 · Civilian labor force: 69,054 · Employed: 66,358 · In labor force: 69,265 · Not in labor force: 36,306 · Population 16 years and over: 105,571 · Total population: 127,200Lee's Summit, Missouri · Unemployment rate: 3.9% · Margin of error: 0.8% · Unemployed: 2,179 · Civilian labor force: 55,607 · Employed: 53,428 · In labor force: 55,970 · Not in labor force: 24,002 · Population 16 years and over: 79,972 · Total population: 102,583Cedar Rapids, Iowa · Unemployment rate: 3.9% · Margin of error: 0.7% · Unemployed: 2,995 · Civilian labor force: 76,060 · Employed: 73,065 · In labor force: 76,093 · Not in labor force: 35,254 · Population 16 years and over: 111,347 · Total population: 136,859Bellevue, Washington · Unemployment rate: 4.0% · Margin of error: 0.6% · Unemployed: 3,333 · Civilian labor force: 83,644 · Employed: 80,311 · In labor force: 83,837 · Not in labor force: 40,827 · Population 16 years and over: 124,664 · Total population: 151,199West Jordan, Utah · Unemployment rate: 4.0% · Margin of error: 0.8% · Unemployed: 2,664 · Civilian labor force: 66,169 · Employed: 63,505 · In labor force: 66,350 · Not in labor force: 20,872 · Population 16 years and over: 87,222 · Total population: 116,277Cape Coral, Florida · Unemployment rate: 4.1% · Margin of error: 0.6% · Unemployed: 4,095 · Civilian labor force: 100,769 · Employed: 96,674 · In labor force: 100,951 · Not in labor force: 73,778 · Population 16 years and over: 174,729 · Total population: 206,387Sunnyvale, California · Unemployment rate: 4.1% · Margin of error: 0.6% · Unemployed: 3,682 · Civilian labor force: 90,586 · Employed: 86,904 · In labor force: 90,686 · Not in labor force: 34,638 · Population 16 years and over: 125,324 · Total population: 153,455San Tan Valley, Arizona · Unemployment rate: 4.1% · Margin of error: 1.0% · Unemployed: 2,156 · Civilian labor force: 52,790 · Employed: 50,634 · In labor force: 52,899 · Not in labor force: 26,697 · Population 16 years and over: 79,596 · Total population: 105,231Plano, Texas · Unemployment rate: 4.1% · Margin of error: 0.5% · Unemployed: 6,656 · Civilian labor force: 161,599 · Employed: 154,943 · In labor force: 161,868 · Not in labor force: 71,592 · Population 16 years and over: 233,460 · Total population: 287,339Durham, North Carolina · Unemployment rate: 4.2% · Margin of error: 0.6% · Unemployed: 6,783 · Civilian labor force: 163,004 · Employed: 156,221 · In labor force: 163,490 · Not in labor force: 72,647 · Population 16 years and over: 236,137 · Total population: 288,465Pembroke Pines, Florida · Unemployment rate: 4.2% · Margin of error: 0.6% · Unemployed: 3,723 · Civilian labor force: 89,360 · Employed: 85,637 · In labor force: 89,709 · Not in labor force: 51,237 · Population 16 years and over: 140,946 · Total population: 170,557Frisco, Texas · Unemployment rate: 4.2% · Margin of error: 0.6% · Unemployed: 4,796 · Civilian labor force: 115,005 · Employed: 110,209 · In labor force: 115,048 · Not in labor force: 45,162 · Population 16 years and over: 160,210 · Total population: 210,238Omaha, Nebraska · Unemployment rate: 4.2% · Margin of error: 0.4% · Unemployed: 11,068 · Civilian labor force: 264,610 · Employed: 253,542 · In labor force: 265,672 · Not in labor force: 115,369 · Population 16 years and over: 381,041 · Total population: 488,197Naperville, Illinois · Unemployment rate: 4.2% · Margin of error: 0.6% · Unemployed: 3,342 · Civilian labor force: 79,856 · Employed: 76,514 · In labor force: 79,940 · Not in labor force: 37,097 · Population 16 years and over: 117,037 · Total population: 149,424Seattle, Washington · Unemployment rate: 4.2% · Margin of error: 0.3% · Unemployed: 20,234 · Civilian labor force: 479,074 · Employed: 458,840 · In labor force: 480,209 · Not in labor force: 167,905 · Population 16 years and over: 648,114 · Total population: 741,440Brandon, Florida · Unemployment rate: 4.2% · Margin of error: 0.9% · Unemployed: 2,644 · Civilian labor force: 62,561 · Employed: 59,917 · In labor force: 62,922 · Not in labor force: 32,346 · Population 16 years and over: 95,268 · Total population: 116,365Little Rock, Arkansas · Unemployment rate: 4.2% · Margin of error: 0.7% · Unemployed: 4,271 · Civilian labor force: 101,007 · Employed: 96,736 · In labor force: 101,166 · Not in labor force: 57,620 · Population 16 years and over: 158,786 · Total population: 202,739Surprise, Arizona · Unemployment rate: 4.2% · Margin of error: 0.8% · Unemployed: 2,904 · Civilian labor force: 68,491 · Employed: 65,587 · In labor force: 69,460 · Not in labor force: 49,065 · Population 16 years and over: 118,525 · Total population: 149,519Broken Arrow, Oklahoma · Unemployment rate: 4.3% · Margin of error: 0.8% · Unemployed: 2,595 · Civilian labor force: 61,043 · Employed: 58,448 · In labor force: 61,179 · Not in labor force: 28,783 · Population 16 years and over: 89,962 · Total population: 115,919Green Bay, Wisconsin · Unemployment rate: 4.3% · Margin of error: 0.7% · Unemployed: 2,437 · Civilian labor force: 56,985 · Employed: 54,548 · In labor force: 57,010 · Not in labor force: 26,873 · Population 16 years and over: 83,883 · Total population: 106,585San Mateo, California · Unemployment rate: 4.3% · Margin of error: 0.9% · Unemployed: 2,551 · Civilian labor force: 59,457 · Employed: 56,906 · In labor force: 59,457 · Not in labor force: 26,043 · Population 16 years and over: 85,500 · Total population: 103,555Irving, Texas · Unemployment rate: 4.3% · Margin of error: 0.6% · Unemployed: 6,036 · Civilian labor force: 140,500 · Employed: 134,464 · In labor force: 140,670 · Not in labor force: 54,549 · Population 16 years and over: 195,219 · Total population: 255,036Virginia Beach, Virginia · Unemployment rate: 4.3% · Margin of error: 0.4% · Unemployed: 10,036 · Civilian labor force: 233,130 · Employed: 223,094 · In labor force: 255,324 · Not in labor force: 112,054 · Population 16 years and over: 367,378 · Total population: 457,066North Charleston, South Carolina · Unemployment rate: 4.3% · Margin of error: 0.8% · Unemployed: 2,643 · Civilian labor force: 61,340 · Employed: 58,697 · In labor force: 64,482 · Not in labor force: 28,724 · Population 16 years and over: 93,206 · Total population: 117,460Allen, Texas · Unemployment rate: 4.3% · Margin of error: 0.9% · Unemployed: 2,503 · Civilian labor force: 58,089 · Employed: 55,586 · In labor force: 58,109 · Not in labor force: 24,714 · Population 16 years and over: 82,823 · Total population: 107,684Fremont, California · Unemployment rate: 4.3% · Margin of error: 0.4% · Unemployed: 5,336 · Civilian labor force: 123,634 · Employed: 118,298 · In labor force: 123,777 · Not in labor force: 59,337 · Population 16 years and over: 183,114 · Total population: 228,518Springfield, Missouri · Unemployment rate: 4.3% · Margin of error: 0.6% · Unemployed: 3,807 · Civilian labor force: 87,653 · Employed: 83,846 · In labor force: 87,804 · Not in labor force: 54,988 · Population 16 years and over: 142,792 · Total population: 169,432Huntsville, Alabama · Unemployment rate: 4.3% · Margin of error: 0.6% · Unemployed: 4,973 · Civilian labor force: 114,373 · Employed: 109,400 · In labor force: 114,715 · Not in labor force: 65,802 · Population 16 years and over: 180,517 · Total population: 218,814West Valley City, Utah · Unemployment rate: 4.4% · Margin of error: 0.7% · Unemployed: 3,211 · Civilian labor force: 73,550 · Employed: 70,339 · In labor force: 73,843 · Not in labor force: 26,935 · Population 16 years and over: 100,778 · Total population: 137,955Waco, Texas · Unemployment rate: 4.4% · Margin of error: 0.8% · Unemployed: 3,022 · Civilian labor force: 69,034 · Employed: 66,012 · In labor force: 69,099 · Not in labor force: 43,268 · Population 16 years and over: 112,367 · Total population: 141,925Santa Clara, California · Unemployment rate: 4.4% · Margin of error: 0.7% · Unemployed: 3,404 · Civilian labor force: 77,717 · Employed: 74,313 · In labor force: 77,974 · Not in labor force: 30,429 · Population 16 years and over: 108,403 · Total population: 129,239Metairie, Louisiana · Unemployment rate: 4.4% · Margin of error: 0.8% · Unemployed: 3,184 · Civilian labor force: 72,688 · Employed: 69,504 · In labor force: 72,981 · Not in labor force: 40,565 · Population 16 years and over: 113,546 · Total population: 138,995Knoxville, Tennessee · Unemployment rate: 4.4% · Margin of error: 0.7% · Unemployed: 4,518 · Civilian labor force: 102,787 · Employed: 98,269 · In labor force: 102,903 · Not in labor force: 59,221 · Population 16 years and over: 162,124 · Total population: 193,721Charlotte, North Carolina · Unemployment rate: 4.4% · Margin of error: 0.3% · Unemployed: 22,496 · Civilian labor force: 509,590 · Employed: 487,094 · In labor force: 510,856 · Not in labor force: 194,368 · Population 16 years and over: 705,224 · Total population: 886,283Davie, Florida · Unemployment rate: 4.4% · Margin of error: 1.0% · Unemployed: 2,625 · Civilian labor force: 59,192 · Employed: 56,567 · In labor force: 59,302 · Not in labor force: 26,700 · Population 16 years and over: 86,002 · Total population: 106,412Renton, Washington · Unemployment rate: 4.5% · Margin of error: 0.7% · Unemployed: 2,692 · Civilian labor force: 60,473 · Employed: 57,781 · In labor force: 60,537 · Not in labor force: 25,431 · Population 16 years and over: 85,968 · Total population: 105,279Escondido, California · Unemployment rate: 4.5% · Margin of error: 0.6% · Unemployed: 3,395 · Civilian labor force: 75,931 · Employed: 72,536 · In labor force: 76,471 · Not in labor force: 43,067 · Population 16 years and over: 119,538 · Total population: 149,913Columbia, Maryland · Unemployment rate: 4.5% · Margin of error: 1.0% · Unemployed: 2,680 · Civilian labor force: 59,805 · Employed: 57,125 · In labor force: 60,493 · Not in labor force: 25,676 · Population 16 years and over: 86,169 · Total population: 105,871Austin, Texas · Unemployment rate: 4.5% · Margin of error: 0.3% · Unemployed: 27,169 · Civilian labor force: 605,628 · Employed: 578,459 · In labor force: 606,238 · Not in labor force: 202,202 · Population 16 years and over: 808,440 · Total population: 967,862Lakewood, Colorado · Unemployment rate: 4.5% · Margin of error: 0.6% · Unemployed: 4,137 · Civilian labor force: 91,779 · Employed: 87,642 · In labor force: 91,970 · Not in labor force: 41,703 · Population 16 years and over: 133,673 · Total population: 156,309Sugar Land, Texas · Unemployment rate: 4.5% · Margin of error: 0.8% · Unemployed: 2,550 · Civilian labor force: 56,536 · Employed: 53,986 · In labor force: 56,616 · Not in labor force: 31,295 · Population 16 years and over: 87,911 · Total population: 109,735Raleigh, North Carolina · Unemployment rate: 4.5% · Margin of error: 0.5% · Unemployed: 12,286 · Civilian labor force: 272,250 · Employed: 259,964 · In labor force: 272,502 · Not in labor force: 113,988 · Population 16 years and over: 386,490 · Total population: 470,763Simi Valley, California · Unemployment rate: 4.5% · Margin of error: 0.6% · Unemployed: 3,120 · Civilian labor force: 68,800 · Employed: 65,680 · In labor force: 68,946 · Not in labor force: 35,068 · Population 16 years and over: 104,014 · Total population: 125,769Nashville-Davidson metropolitan government (balance), Tennessee · Unemployment rate: 4.6% · Margin of error: 0.4% · Unemployed: 18,357 · Civilian labor force: 401,131 · Employed: 382,774 · In labor force: 401,744 · Not in labor force: 154,493 · Population 16 years and over: 556,237 · Total population: 684,298Anchorage, Alaska · Unemployment rate: 4.6% · Margin of error: 0.5% · Unemployed: 6,811 · Civilian labor force: 148,752 · Employed: 141,941 · In labor force: 158,566 · Not in labor force: 68,691 · Population 16 years and over: 227,257 · Total population: 289,069Mesa, Arizona · Unemployment rate: 4.6% · Margin of error: 0.4% · Unemployed: 12,044 · Civilian labor force: 262,345 · Employed: 250,301 · In labor force: 262,743 · Not in labor force: 140,321 · Population 16 years and over: 403,064 · Total population: 507,478Miramar, Florida · Unemployment rate: 4.6% · Margin of error: 0.7% · Unemployed: 3,622 · Civilian labor force: 78,841 · Employed: 75,219 · In labor force: 78,918 · Not in labor force: 30,958 · Population 16 years and over: 109,876 · Total population: 135,986Denver, Colorado · Unemployment rate: 4.6% · Margin of error: 0.3% · Unemployed: 20,324 · Civilian labor force: 441,933 · Employed: 421,609 · In labor force: 443,076 · Not in labor force: 153,372 · Population 16 years and over: 596,448 · Total population: 713,734Thornton, Colorado · Unemployment rate: 4.6% · Margin of error: 0.7% · Unemployed: 3,746 · Civilian labor force: 81,389 · Employed: 77,643 · In labor force: 81,508 · Not in labor force: 28,387 · Population 16 years and over: 109,895 · Total population: 142,878Lynn, Massachusetts · Unemployment rate: 4.6% · Margin of error: 0.9% · Unemployed: 2,454 · Civilian labor force: 53,168 · Employed: 50,714 · In labor force: 53,168 · Not in labor force: 26,688 · Population 16 years and over: 79,856 · Total population: 100,905Jacksonville, Florida · Unemployment rate: 4.6% · Margin of error: 0.3% · Unemployed: 22,455 · Civilian labor force: 485,398 · Employed: 462,943 · In labor force: 500,893 · Not in labor force: 265,068 · Population 16 years and over: 765,961 · Total population: 961,739Hillsboro, Oregon · Unemployment rate: 4.6% · Margin of error: 0.8% · Unemployed: 2,882 · Civilian labor force: 62,115 · Employed: 59,233 · In labor force: 62,115 · Not in labor force: 24,778 · Population 16 years and over: 86,893 · Total population: 107,050Wilmington, North Carolina · Unemployment rate: 4.6% · Margin of error: 0.8% · Unemployed: 3,016 · Civilian labor force: 64,999 · Employed: 61,983 · In labor force: 65,405 · Not in labor force: 35,520 · Population 16 years and over: 100,925 · Total population: 118,578San Jose, California · Unemployment rate: 4.7% · Margin of error: 0.3% · Unemployed: 25,553 · Civilian labor force: 547,738 · Employed: 522,185 · In labor force: 548,145 · Not in labor force: 260,104 · Population 16 years and over: 808,249 · Total population: 990,054Provo, Utah · Unemployment rate: 4.7% · Margin of error: 0.6% · Unemployed: 3,261 · Civilian labor force: 69,880 · Employed: 66,619 · In labor force: 69,974 · Not in labor force: 25,230 · Population 16 years and over: 95,204 · Total population: 114,303Tyler, Texas · Unemployment rate: 4.7% · Margin of error: 0.9% · Unemployed: 2,531 · Civilian labor force: 54,063 · Employed: 51,532 · In labor force: 54,097 · Not in labor force: 31,491 · Population 16 years and over: 85,588 · Total population: 107,718Oklahoma City, Oklahoma · Unemployment rate: 4.7% · Margin of error: 0.4% · Unemployed: 16,686 · Civilian labor force: 355,722 · Employed: 339,036 · In labor force: 361,194 · Not in labor force: 174,576 · Population 16 years and over: 535,770 · Total population: 688,693Salinas, California · Unemployment rate: 4.7% · Margin of error: 0.7% · Unemployed: 3,447 · Civilian labor force: 73,227 · Employed: 69,780 · In labor force: 73,271 · Not in labor force: 45,744 · Population 16 years and over: 119,015 · Total population: 161,993Orange, California · Unemployment rate: 4.7% · Margin of error: 0.8% · Unemployed: 3,565 · Civilian labor force: 75,695 · Employed: 72,130 · In labor force: 75,748 · Not in labor force: 37,643 · Population 16 years and over: 113,391 · Total population: 138,723Kansas City, Missouri · Unemployment rate: 4.7% · Margin of error: 0.4% · Unemployed: 13,143 · Civilian labor force: 278,770 · Employed: 265,627 · In labor force: 279,516 · Not in labor force: 126,403 · Population 16 years and over: 405,919 · Total population: 508,233Clearwater, Florida · Unemployment rate: 4.7% · Margin of error: 1.0% · Unemployed: 2,754 · Civilian labor force: 58,399 · Employed: 55,645 · In labor force: 58,576 · Not in labor force: 40,574 · Population 16 years and over: 99,150 · Total population: 117,075Tampa, Florida · Unemployment rate: 4.7% · Margin of error: 0.5% · Unemployed: 9,943 · Civilian labor force: 210,670 · Employed: 200,727 · In labor force: 213,495 · Not in labor force: 107,756 · Population 16 years and over: 321,251 · Total population: 393,389Concord, North Carolina · Unemployment rate: 4.8% · Margin of error: 1.1% · Unemployed: 2,707 · Civilian labor force: 56,766 · Employed: 54,059 · In labor force: 56,973 · Not in labor force: 23,677 · Population 16 years and over: 80,650 · Total population: 106,518Mesquite, Texas · Unemployment rate: 4.8% · Margin of error: 0.8% · Unemployed: 3,755 · Civilian labor force: 78,731 · Employed: 74,976 · In labor force: 78,772 · Not in labor force: 33,850 · Population 16 years and over: 112,622 · Total population: 148,848Richardson, Texas · Unemployment rate: 4.8% · Margin of error: 0.8% · Unemployed: 3,258 · Civilian labor force: 68,162 · Employed: 64,904 · In labor force: 68,275 · Not in labor force: 28,147 · Population 16 years and over: 96,422 · Total population: 118,269Riverview, Florida · Unemployment rate: 4.8% · Margin of error: 1.1% · Unemployed: 2,795 · Civilian labor force: 58,431 · Employed: 55,636 · In labor force: 59,414 · Not in labor force: 23,582 · Population 16 years and over: 82,996 · Total population: 107,776Lubbock, Texas · Unemployment rate: 4.8% · Margin of error: 0.5% · Unemployed: 6,560 · Civilian labor force: 136,923 · Employed: 130,363 · In labor force: 137,299 · Not in labor force: 70,880 · Population 16 years and over: 208,179 · Total population: 261,078Davenport, Iowa · Unemployment rate: 4.8% · Margin of error: 0.7% · Unemployed: 2,550 · Civilian labor force: 53,129 · Employed: 50,579 · In labor force: 53,255 · Not in labor force: 28,639 · Population 16 years and over: 81,894 · Total population: 101,083Gainesville, Florida · Unemployment rate: 4.8% · Margin of error: 0.8% · Unemployed: 3,520 · Civilian labor force: 73,173 · Employed: 69,653 · In labor force: 73,219 · Not in labor force: 53,237 · Population 16 years and over: 126,456 · Total population: 143,611Rio Rancho, New Mexico · Unemployment rate: 4.8% · Margin of error: 0.8% · Unemployed: 2,528 · Civilian labor force: 52,416 · Employed: 49,888 · In labor force: 52,665 · Not in labor force: 32,315 · Population 16 years and over: 84,980 · Total population: 106,533College Station, Texas · Unemployment rate: 4.8% · Margin of error: 0.7% · Unemployed: 3,114 · Civilian labor force: 64,341 · Employed: 61,227 · In labor force: 64,476 · Not in labor force: 39,109 · Population 16 years and over: 103,585 · Total population: 122,280Roseville, California · Unemployment rate: 4.8% · Margin of error: 0.6% · Unemployed: 3,840 · Civilian labor force: 79,262 · Employed: 75,422 · In labor force: 79,583 · Not in labor force: 42,320 · Population 16 years and over: 121,903 · Total population: 152,438Goodyear, Arizona · Unemployment rate: 4.8% · Margin of error: 1.1% · Unemployed: 2,349 · Civilian labor force: 48,466 · Employed: 46,117 · In labor force: 48,962 · Not in labor force: 33,653 · Population 16 years and over: 82,615 · Total population: 102,891Concord, California · Unemployment rate: 4.9% · Margin of error: 0.6% · Unemployed: 3,283 · Civilian labor force: 67,246 · Employed: 63,963 · In labor force: 67,305 · Not in labor force: 33,302 · Population 16 years and over: 100,607 · Total population: 124,260Costa Mesa, California · Unemployment rate: 4.9% · Margin of error: 0.7% · Unemployed: 3,315 · Civilian labor force: 67,877 · Employed: 64,562 · In labor force: 67,989 · Not in labor force: 24,437 · Population 16 years and over: 92,426 · Total population: 110,538The Woodlands, Texas · Unemployment rate: 4.9% · Margin of error: 1.2% · Unemployed: 2,678 · Civilian labor force: 54,669 · Employed: 51,991 · In labor force: 54,740 · Not in labor force: 34,100 · Population 16 years and over: 88,840 · Total population: 116,916Fort Worth, Texas · Unemployment rate: 4.9% · Margin of error: 0.4% · Unemployed: 24,060 · Civilian labor force: 490,932 · Employed: 466,872 · In labor force: 492,691 · Not in labor force: 226,490 · Population 16 years and over: 719,181 · Total population: 941,311Topeka, Kansas · Unemployment rate: 4.9% · Margin of error: 0.8% · Unemployed: 3,074 · Civilian labor force: 62,610 · Employed: 59,536 · In labor force: 62,868 · Not in labor force: 38,329 · Population 16 years and over: 101,197 · Total population: 126,103Garland, Texas · Unemployment rate: 4.9% · Margin of error: 0.7% · Unemployed: 6,405 · Civilian labor force: 130,197 · Employed: 123,792 · In labor force: 130,251 · Not in labor force: 59,037 · Population 16 years and over: 189,288 · Total population: 245,298Dallas, Texas · Unemployment rate: 4.9% · Margin of error: 0.3% · Unemployed: 34,531 · Civilian labor force: 700,892 · Employed: 666,361 · In labor force: 701,693 · Not in labor force: 317,476 · Population 16 years and over: 1,019,169 · Total population: 1,299,553Chesapeake, Virginia · Unemployment rate: 4.9% · Margin of error: 0.8% · Unemployed: 6,111 · Civilian labor force: 124,023 · Employed: 117,912 · In labor force: 132,285 · Not in labor force: 65,248 · Population 16 years and over: 197,533 · Total population: 251,153Stamford, Connecticut · Unemployment rate: 4.9% · Margin of error: 0.8% · Unemployed: 4,006 · Civilian labor force: 81,246 · Employed: 77,240 · In labor force: 81,283 · Not in labor force: 31,885 · Population 16 years and over: 113,168 · Total population: 135,806Chattanooga, Tennessee · Unemployment rate: 4.9% · Margin of error: 0.7% · Unemployed: 4,706 · Civilian labor force: 95,398 · Employed: 90,692 · In labor force: 95,506 · Not in labor force: 52,990 · Population 16 years and over: 148,496 · Total population: 182,832St. Petersburg, Florida · Unemployment rate: 4.9% · Margin of error: 0.6% · Unemployed: 7,106 · Civilian labor force: 143,726 · Employed: 136,620 · In labor force: 144,814 · Not in labor force: 79,214 · Population 16 years and over: 224,028 · Total population: 260,646St. Paul, Minnesota · Unemployment rate: 4.9% · Margin of error: 0.4% · Unemployed: 8,463 · Civilian labor force: 171,171 · Employed: 162,708 · In labor force: 171,331 · Not in labor force: 71,531 · Population 16 years and over: 242,862 · Total population: 307,762Thousand Oaks, California · Unemployment rate: 4.9% · Margin of error: 0.7% · Unemployed: 3,215 · Civilian labor force: 65,007 · Employed: 61,792 · In labor force: 65,135 · Not in labor force: 38,982 · Population 16 years and over: 104,117 · Total population: 125,676Miami, Florida · Unemployment rate: 5.0% · Margin of error: 0.5% · Unemployed: 12,556 · Civilian labor force: 253,520 · Employed: 240,964 · In labor force: 253,934 · Not in labor force: 126,610 · Population 16 years and over: 380,544 · Total population: 446,663Urban Honolulu, Hawaii · Unemployment rate: 5.0% · Margin of error: 0.5% · Unemployed: 9,108 · Civilian labor force: 183,706 · Employed: 174,598 · In labor force: 191,993 · Not in labor force: 103,966 · Population 16 years and over: 295,959 · Total population: 346,323San Buenaventura (Ventura), California · Unemployment rate: 5.0% · Margin of error: 0.8% · Unemployed: 2,904 · Civilian labor force: 58,319 · Employed: 55,415 · In labor force: 58,588 · Not in labor force: 31,956 · Population 16 years and over: 90,544 · Total population: 109,900Louisville/Jefferson County metro government (balance), Kentucky · Unemployment rate: 5.0% · Margin of error: 0.4% · Unemployed: 16,392 · Civilian labor force: 328,228 · Employed: 311,836 · In labor force: 329,160 · Not in labor force: 171,995 · Population 16 years and over: 501,155 · Total population: 627,210Lexington-Fayette urban county, Kentucky · Unemployment rate: 5.0% · Margin of error: 0.4% · Unemployed: 8,866 · Civilian labor force: 177,301 · Employed: 168,435 · In labor force: 177,455 · Not in labor force: 83,874 · Population 16 years and over: 261,329 · Total population: 321,122Grand Rapids, Michigan · Unemployment rate: 5.0% · Margin of error: 0.6% · Unemployed: 5,489 · Civilian labor force: 109,648 · Employed: 104,159 · In labor force: 109,811 · Not in labor force: 50,031 · Population 16 years and over: 159,842 · Total population: 197,768Reno, Nevada · Unemployment rate: 5.0% · Margin of error: 0.5% · Unemployed: 7,425 · Civilian labor force: 148,184 · Employed: 140,759 · In labor force: 148,705 · Not in labor force: 72,730 · Population 16 years and over: 221,435 · Total population: 268,959Daly City, California · Unemployment rate: 5.0% · Margin of error: 0.8% · Unemployed: 2,983 · Civilian labor force: 59,501 · Employed: 56,518 · In labor force: 59,785 · Not in labor force: 29,405 · Population 16 years and over: 89,190 · Total population: 102,560St. Louis, Missouri · Unemployment rate: 5.0% · Margin of error: 0.4% · Unemployed: 8,179 · Civilian labor force: 162,066 · Employed: 153,887 · In labor force: 162,817 · Not in labor force: 81,437 · Population 16 years and over: 244,254 · Total population: 293,109Lafayette, Louisiana · Unemployment rate: 5.1% · Margin of error: 0.8% · Unemployed: 3,125 · Civilian labor force: 61,866 · Employed: 58,741 · In labor force: 62,089 · Not in labor force: 36,357 · Population 16 years and over: 98,446 · Total population: 121,537Lakeland, Florida · Unemployment rate: 5.1% · Margin of error: 0.9% · Unemployed: 2,742 · Civilian labor force: 54,163 · Employed: 51,421 · In labor force: 54,353 · Not in labor force: 43,201 · Population 16 years and over: 97,554 · Total population: 117,030Columbus, Ohio · Unemployment rate: 5.1% · Margin of error: 0.3% · Unemployed: 25,970 · Civilian labor force: 511,848 · Employed: 485,878 · In labor force: 512,498 · Not in labor force: 213,472 · Population 16 years and over: 725,970 · Total population: 906,480Phoenix, Arizona · Unemployment rate: 5.1% · Margin of error: 0.2% · Unemployed: 44,358 · Civilian labor force: 869,141 · Employed: 824,783 · In labor force: 870,196 · Not in labor force: 408,977 · Population 16 years and over: 1,279,173 · Total population: 1,624,832Greensboro, North Carolina · Unemployment rate: 5.1% · Margin of error: 0.6% · Unemployed: 7,998 · Civilian labor force: 156,548 · Employed: 148,550 · In labor force: 157,138 · Not in labor force: 82,190 · Population 16 years and over: 239,328 · Total population: 298,564Grand Prairie, Texas · Unemployment rate: 5.2% · Margin of error: 0.8% · Unemployed: 5,369 · Civilian labor force: 104,161 · Employed: 98,792 · In labor force: 104,365 · Not in labor force: 45,449 · Population 16 years and over: 149,814 · Total population: 198,564Fort Collins, Colorado · Unemployment rate: 5.2% · Margin of error: 0.7% · Unemployed: 5,273 · Civilian labor force: 102,258 · Employed: 96,985 · In labor force: 102,697 · Not in labor force: 42,574 · Population 16 years and over: 145,271 · Total population: 169,705Santa Ana, California · Unemployment rate: 5.2% · Margin of error: 0.5% · Unemployed: 8,507 · Civilian labor force: 164,702 · Employed: 156,195 · In labor force: 164,804 · Not in labor force: 83,735 · Population 16 years and over: 248,539 · Total population: 311,639Athens-Clarke County unified government (balance), Georgia · Unemployment rate: 5.2% · Margin of error: 0.9% · Unemployed: 3,473 · Civilian labor force: 67,070 · Employed: 63,597 · In labor force: 67,311 · Not in labor force: 40,328 · Population 16 years and over: 107,639 · Total population: 126,987Indianapolis city (balance), Indiana · Unemployment rate: 5.2% · Margin of error: 0.4% · Unemployed: 24,243 · Civilian labor force: 466,020 · Employed: 441,777 · In labor force: 466,653 · Not in labor force: 219,499 · Population 16 years and over: 686,152 · Total population: 882,043Denton, Texas · Unemployment rate: 5.2% · Margin of error: 0.7% · Unemployed: 4,311 · Civilian labor force: 82,450 · Employed: 78,139 · In labor force: 82,484 · Not in labor force: 40,640 · Population 16 years and over: 123,124 · Total population: 146,987Glendale, Arizona · Unemployment rate: 5.3% · Margin of error: 0.5% · Unemployed: 6,569 · Civilian labor force: 124,587 · Employed: 118,018 · In labor force: 126,322 · Not in labor force: 68,421 · Population 16 years and over: 194,743 · Total population: 250,193Salem, Oregon · Unemployment rate: 5.3% · Margin of error: 0.9% · Unemployed: 4,541 · Civilian labor force: 86,117 · Employed: 81,576 · In labor force: 86,525 · Not in labor force: 54,311 · Population 16 years and over: 140,836 · Total population: 176,666Evansville, Indiana · Unemployment rate: 5.3% · Margin of error: 0.8% · Unemployed: 3,133 · Civilian labor force: 59,409 · Employed: 56,276 · In labor force: 59,409 · Not in labor force: 34,289 · Population 16 years and over: 93,698 · Total population: 116,441Lehigh Acres, Florida · Unemployment rate: 5.3% · Margin of error: 1.0% · Unemployed: 3,178 · Civilian labor force: 60,068 · Employed: 56,890 · In labor force: 60,068 · Not in labor force: 36,675 · Population 16 years and over: 96,743 · Total population: 127,391Orlando, Florida · Unemployment rate: 5.3% · Margin of error: 0.7% · Unemployed: 9,495 · Civilian labor force: 179,364 · Employed: 169,869 · In labor force: 180,119 · Not in labor force: 71,889 · Population 16 years and over: 252,008 · Total population: 311,732Fairfield, California · Unemployment rate: 5.3% · Margin of error: 0.9% · Unemployed: 3,098 · Civilian labor force: 58,496 · Employed: 55,398 · In labor force: 60,546 · Not in labor force: 34,152 · Population 16 years and over: 94,698 · Total population: 119,985Albuquerque, New Mexico · Unemployment rate: 5.3% · Margin of error: 0.4% · Unemployed: 15,623 · Civilian labor force: 293,931 · Employed: 278,308 · In labor force: 296,349 · Not in labor force: 164,516 · Population 16 years and over: 460,865 · Total population: 562,488Santa Clarita, California · Unemployment rate: 5.3% · Margin of error: 0.6% · Unemployed: 6,359 · Civilian labor force: 119,267 · Employed: 112,908 · In labor force: 119,315 · Not in labor force: 59,412 · Population 16 years and over: 178,727 · Total population: 229,021Gresham, Oregon · Unemployment rate: 5.3% · Margin of error: 0.9% · Unemployed: 3,133 · Civilian labor force: 58,665 · Employed: 55,532 · In labor force: 58,697 · Not in labor force: 31,343 · Population 16 years and over: 90,040 · Total population: 112,818Pasadena, California · Unemployment rate: 5.3% · Margin of error: 0.7% · Unemployed: 4,195 · Civilian labor force: 78,456 · Employed: 74,261 · In labor force: 78,492 · Not in labor force: 38,146 · Population 16 years and over: 116,638 · Total population: 136,462Tacoma, Washington · Unemployment rate: 5.3% · Margin of error: 0.5% · Unemployed: 6,363 · Civilian labor force: 118,984 · Employed: 112,621 · In labor force: 121,510 · Not in labor force: 60,385 · Population 16 years and over: 181,895 · Total population: 220,482Beaumont, Texas · Unemployment rate: 5.3% · Margin of error: 1.0% · Unemployed: 2,840 · Civilian labor force: 53,092 · Employed: 50,252 · In labor force: 53,326 · Not in labor force: 34,163 · Population 16 years and over: 87,489 · Total population: 113,710Fort Lauderdale, Florida · Unemployment rate: 5.3% · Margin of error: 0.7% · Unemployed: 5,400 · Civilian labor force: 100,948 · Employed: 95,548 · In labor force: 101,000 · Not in labor force: 53,786 · Population 16 years and over: 154,786 · Total population: 183,032Lowell, Massachusetts · Unemployment rate: 5.4% · Margin of error: 0.8% · Unemployed: 3,348 · Civilian labor force: 62,349 · Employed: 59,001 · In labor force: 62,411 · Not in labor force: 30,181 · Population 16 years and over: 92,592 · Total population: 114,799Oceanside, California · Unemployment rate: 5.4% · Margin of error: 0.5% · Unemployed: 4,823 · Civilian labor force: 89,639 · Employed: 84,816 · In labor force: 93,393 · Not in labor force: 46,672 · Population 16 years and over: 140,065 · Total population: 172,542Everett, Washington · Unemployment rate: 5.4% · Margin of error: 0.9% · Unemployed: 3,239 · Civilian labor force: 60,021 · Employed: 56,782 · In labor force: 61,470 · Not in labor force: 30,025 · Population 16 years and over: 91,495 · Total population: 111,083Huntington Beach, California · Unemployment rate: 5.4% · Margin of error: 0.6% · Unemployed: 5,933 · Civilian labor force: 109,480 · Employed: 103,547 · In labor force: 109,588 · Not in labor force: 56,167 · Population 16 years and over: 165,755 · Total population: 196,010West Palm Beach, Florida · Unemployment rate: 5.4% · Margin of error: 0.9% · Unemployed: 3,483 · Civilian labor force: 64,243 · Employed: 60,760 · In labor force: 64,332 · Not in labor force: 35,989 · Population 16 years and over: 100,321 · Total population: 119,508Corpus Christi, Texas · Unemployment rate: 5.4% · Margin of error: 0.5% · Unemployed: 8,335 · Civilian labor force: 153,675 · Employed: 145,340 · In labor force: 155,984 · Not in labor force: 93,752 · Population 16 years and over: 249,736 · Total population: 317,383Corona, California · Unemployment rate: 5.4% · Margin of error: 0.7% · Unemployed: 4,567 · Civilian labor force: 83,892 · Employed: 79,325 · In labor force: 84,137 · Not in labor force: 41,922 · Population 16 years and over: 126,059 · Total population: 158,839Laredo, Texas · Unemployment rate: 5.5% · Margin of error: 0.7% · Unemployed: 6,262 · Civilian labor force: 114,846 · Employed: 108,584 · In labor force: 114,968 · Not in labor force: 68,993 · Population 16 years and over: 183,961 · Total population: 255,949Santa Rosa, California · Unemployment rate: 5.5% · Margin of error: 0.8% · Unemployed: 5,259 · Civilian labor force: 96,449 · Employed: 91,190 · In labor force: 96,708 · Not in labor force: 48,423 · Population 16 years and over: 145,131 · Total population: 177,216Odessa, Texas · Unemployment rate: 5.5% · Margin of error: 1.0% · Unemployed: 3,184 · Civilian labor force: 58,314 · Employed: 55,130 · In labor force: 58,381 · Not in labor force: 25,462 · Population 16 years and over: 83,843 · Total population: 114,080Coral Springs, Florida · Unemployment rate: 5.5% · Margin of error: 1.2% · Unemployed: 3,970 · Civilian labor force: 72,593 · Employed: 68,623 · In labor force: 72,726 · Not in labor force: 30,505 · Population 16 years and over: 103,231 · Total population: 133,962McAllen, Texas · Unemployment rate: 5.5% · Margin of error: 0.9% · Unemployed: 3,686 · Civilian labor force: 67,256 · Employed: 63,570 · In labor force: 67,352 · Not in labor force: 41,579 · Population 16 years and over: 108,931 · Total population: 143,789Port St. Lucie, Florida · Unemployment rate: 5.5% · Margin of error: 0.8% · Unemployed: 5,904 · Civilian labor force: 107,265 · Employed: 101,361 · In labor force: 107,523 · Not in labor force: 72,669 · Population 16 years and over: 180,192 · Total population: 220,453Torrance, California · Unemployment rate: 5.5% · Margin of error: 0.9% · Unemployed: 4,130 · Civilian labor force: 75,008 · Employed: 70,878 · In labor force: 75,234 · Not in labor force: 41,495 · Population 16 years and over: 116,729 · Total population: 143,499Kansas City, Kansas · Unemployment rate: 5.5% · Margin of error: 0.6% · Unemployed: 4,209 · Civilian labor force: 76,247 · Employed: 72,038 · In labor force: 76,474 · Not in labor force: 40,275 · Population 16 years and over: 116,749 · Total population: 154,776Anaheim, California · Unemployment rate: 5.5% · Margin of error: 0.5% · Unemployed: 10,214 · Civilian labor force: 184,854 · Employed: 174,640 · In labor force: 185,049 · Not in labor force: 91,779 · Population 16 years and over: 276,828 · Total population: 344,553Irvine, California · Unemployment rate: 5.5% · Margin of error: 0.7% · Unemployed: 9,127 · Civilian labor force: 165,148 · Employed: 156,021 · In labor force: 165,435 · Not in labor force: 83,099 · Population 16 years and over: 248,534 · Total population: 308,160Portland, Oregon · Unemployment rate: 5.5% · Margin of error: 0.4% · Unemployed: 21,405 · Civilian labor force: 386,782 · Employed: 365,377 · In labor force: 386,923 · Not in labor force: 161,072 · Population 16 years and over: 547,995 · Total population: 642,715Fort Wayne, Indiana · Unemployment rate: 5.5% · Margin of error: 0.6% · Unemployed: 7,615 · Civilian labor force: 137,259 · Employed: 129,644 · In labor force: 137,435 · Not in labor force: 71,382 · Population 16 years and over: 208,817 · Total population: 266,235Colorado Springs, Colorado · Unemployment rate: 5.5% · Margin of error: 0.5% · Unemployed: 14,069 · Civilian labor force: 253,552 · Employed: 239,483 · In labor force: 266,744 · Not in labor force: 121,064 · Population 16 years and over: 387,808 · Total population: 483,099Vancouver, Washington · Unemployment rate: 5.6% · Margin of error: 0.8% · Unemployed: 5,635 · Civilian labor force: 101,224 · Employed: 95,589 · In labor force: 101,818 · Not in labor force: 53,889 · Population 16 years and over: 155,707 · Total population: 192,696Norwalk, California · Unemployment rate: 5.6% · Margin of error: 0.8% · Unemployed: 2,850 · Civilian labor force: 51,186 · Employed: 48,336 · In labor force: 51,289 · Not in labor force: 29,326 · Population 16 years and over: 80,615 · Total population: 100,713High Point, North Carolina · Unemployment rate: 5.6% · Margin of error: 0.9% · Unemployed: 3,196 · Civilian labor force: 56,994 · Employed: 53,798 · In labor force: 57,092 · Not in labor force: 35,204 · Population 16 years and over: 92,296 · Total population: 115,263San Francisco, California · Unemployment rate: 5.6% · Margin of error: 0.3% · Unemployed: 28,900 · Civilian labor force: 513,866 · Employed: 484,966 · In labor force: 514,336 · Not in labor force: 219,434 · Population 16 years and over: 733,770 · Total population: 836,321Tempe, Arizona · Unemployment rate: 5.6% · Margin of error: 0.9% · Unemployed: 6,537 · Civilian labor force: 115,734 · Employed: 109,197 · In labor force: 115,877 · Not in labor force: 46,926 · Population 16 years and over: 162,803 · Total population: 186,419Minneapolis, Minnesota · Unemployment rate: 5.7% · Margin of error: 0.4% · Unemployed: 14,708 · Civilian labor force: 259,886 · Employed: 245,178 · In labor force: 260,326 · Not in labor force: 93,716 · Population 16 years and over: 354,042 · Total population: 426,845Aurora, Colorado · Unemployment rate: 5.7% · Margin of error: 0.5% · Unemployed: 12,372 · Civilian labor force: 217,939 · Employed: 205,567 · In labor force: 219,919 · Not in labor force: 86,074 · Population 16 years and over: 305,993 · Total population: 390,201Wichita, Kansas · Unemployment rate: 5.7% · Margin of error: 0.4% · Unemployed: 11,538 · Civilian labor force: 202,950 · Employed: 191,412 · In labor force: 204,732 · Not in labor force: 106,171 · Population 16 years and over: 310,903 · Total population: 396,488Sparks, Nevada · Unemployment rate: 5.7% · Margin of error: 1.0% · Unemployed: 3,371 · Civilian labor force: 59,251 · Employed: 55,880 · In labor force: 59,405 · Not in labor force: 27,550 · Population 16 years and over: 86,955 · Total population: 109,106Arlington, Texas · Unemployment rate: 5.7% · Margin of error: 0.5% · Unemployed: 12,348 · Civilian labor force: 215,616 · Employed: 203,268 · In labor force: 216,087 · Not in labor force: 92,048 · Population 16 years and over: 308,135 · Total population: 394,769Norman, Oklahoma · Unemployment rate: 5.7% · Margin of error: 0.7% · Unemployed: 3,947 · Civilian labor force: 68,856 · Employed: 64,909 · In labor force: 69,510 · Not in labor force: 38,777 · Population 16 years and over: 108,287 · Total population: 128,714Temecula, California · Unemployment rate: 5.7% · Margin of error: 1.0% · Unemployed: 3,070 · Civilian labor force: 53,400 · Employed: 50,330 · In labor force: 54,785 · Not in labor force: 28,293 · Population 16 years and over: 83,078 · Total population: 110,404Garden Grove, California · Unemployment rate: 5.7% · Margin of error: 0.6% · Unemployed: 5,098 · Civilian labor force: 88,675 · Employed: 83,577 · In labor force: 88,771 · Not in labor force: 50,288 · Population 16 years and over: 139,059 · Total population: 170,603Des Moines, Iowa · Unemployment rate: 5.7% · Margin of error: 0.6% · Unemployed: 6,872 · Civilian labor force: 119,526 · Employed: 112,654 · In labor force: 119,617 · Not in labor force: 49,586 · Population 16 years and over: 169,203 · Total population: 212,464Joliet, Illinois · Unemployment rate: 5.8% · Margin of error: 0.8% · Unemployed: 4,604 · Civilian labor force: 79,792 · Employed: 75,188 · In labor force: 79,879 · Not in labor force: 36,126 · Population 16 years and over: 116,005 · Total population: 149,785Downey, California · Unemployment rate: 5.8% · Margin of error: 0.9% · Unemployed: 3,427 · Civilian labor force: 59,379 · Employed: 55,952 · In labor force: 59,508 · Not in labor force: 31,066 · Population 16 years and over: 90,574 · Total population: 111,793Jersey City, New Jersey · Unemployment rate: 5.8% · Margin of error: 0.6% · Unemployed: 9,643 · Civilian labor force: 166,751 · Employed: 157,108 · In labor force: 166,832 · Not in labor force: 70,298 · Population 16 years and over: 237,130 · Total population: 289,691Rancho Cucamonga, California · Unemployment rate: 5.8% · Margin of error: 0.8% · Unemployed: 5,357 · Civilian labor force: 91,931 · Employed: 86,574 · In labor force: 92,021 · Not in labor force: 46,763 · Population 16 years and over: 138,784 · Total population: 174,693San Antonio, Texas · Unemployment rate: 5.8% · Margin of error: 0.3% · Unemployed: 43,479 · Civilian labor force: 744,811 · Employed: 701,332 · In labor force: 758,111 · Not in labor force: 393,245 · Population 16 years and over: 1,151,356 · Total population: 1,458,954Greeley, Colorado · Unemployment rate: 5.8% · Margin of error: 0.8% · Unemployed: 3,267 · Civilian labor force: 55,963 · Employed: 52,696 · In labor force: 56,096 · Not in labor force: 29,592 · Population 16 years and over: 85,688 · Total population: 109,421Pueblo, Colorado · Unemployment rate: 5.9% · Margin of error: 0.9% · Unemployed: 2,853 · Civilian labor force: 48,727 · Employed: 45,874 · In labor force: 49,074 · Not in labor force: 40,339 · Population 16 years and over: 89,413 · Total population: 111,514San Diego, California · Unemployment rate: 5.9% · Margin of error: 0.3% · Unemployed: 43,867 · Civilian labor force: 748,690 · Employed: 704,823 · In labor force: 788,942 · Not in labor force: 365,430 · Population 16 years and over: 1,154,372 · Total population: 1,385,061Hayward, California · Unemployment rate: 5.9% · Margin of error: 0.7% · Unemployed: 5,169 · Civilian labor force: 88,154 · Employed: 82,985 · In labor force: 88,399 · Not in labor force: 42,843 · Population 16 years and over: 131,242 · Total population: 159,201Spokane Valley, Washington · Unemployment rate: 5.9% · Margin of error: 0.9% · Unemployed: 3,178 · Civilian labor force: 54,193 · Employed: 51,015 · In labor force: 54,462 · Not in labor force: 29,878 · Population 16 years and over: 84,340 · Total population: 105,460Clovis, California · Unemployment rate: 5.9% · Margin of error: 1.0% · Unemployed: 3,502 · Civilian labor force: 59,646 · Employed: 56,144 · In labor force: 59,895 · Not in labor force: 31,273 · Population 16 years and over: 91,168 · Total population: 122,719Aurora, Illinois · Unemployment rate: 5.9% · Margin of error: 0.7% · Unemployed: 5,894 · Civilian labor force: 100,126 · Employed: 94,232 · In labor force: 100,171 · Not in labor force: 37,994 · Population 16 years and over: 138,165 · Total population: 179,867Newport News, Virginia · Unemployment rate: 5.9% · Margin of error: 0.7% · Unemployed: 5,289 · Civilian labor force: 89,756 · Employed: 84,467 · In labor force: 98,521 · Not in labor force: 47,418 · Population 16 years and over: 145,939 · Total population: 184,774Atlanta, Georgia · Unemployment rate: 5.9% · Margin of error: 0.5% · Unemployed: 16,857 · Civilian labor force: 285,830 · Employed: 268,973 · In labor force: 286,317 · Not in labor force: 135,701 · Population 16 years and over: 422,018 · Total population: 499,287Winston-Salem, North Carolina · Unemployment rate: 5.9% · Margin of error: 0.6% · Unemployed: 7,220 · Civilian labor force: 122,371 · Employed: 115,151 · In labor force: 122,917 · Not in labor force: 76,091 · Population 16 years and over: 199,008 · Total population: 250,887Palm Bay, Florida · Unemployment rate: 5.9% · Margin of error: 0.9% · Unemployed: 3,607 · Civilian labor force: 60,862 · Employed: 57,255 · In labor force: 61,386 · Not in labor force: 39,723 · Population 16 years and over: 101,109 · Total population: 125,273Milwaukee, Wisconsin · Unemployment rate: 5.9% · Margin of error: 0.3% · Unemployed: 16,684 · Civilian labor force: 281,082 · Employed: 264,398 · In labor force: 281,280 · Not in labor force: 158,275 · Population 16 years and over: 439,555 · Total population: 569,756Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania · Unemployment rate: 5.9% · Margin of error: 0.4% · Unemployed: 10,120 · Civilian labor force: 170,488 · Employed: 160,368 · In labor force: 170,736 · Not in labor force: 92,707 · Population 16 years and over: 263,443 · Total population: 303,620Visalia, California · Unemployment rate: 5.9% · Margin of error: 0.9% · Unemployed: 4,013 · Civilian labor force: 67,594 · Employed: 63,581 · In labor force: 67,867 · Not in labor force: 38,445 · Population 16 years and over: 106,312 · Total population: 142,649Mobile, Alabama · Unemployment rate: 5.9% · Margin of error: 0.6% · Unemployed: 5,263 · Civilian labor force: 88,458 · Employed: 83,195 · In labor force: 88,808 · Not in labor force: 60,873 · Population 16 years and over: 149,681 · Total population: 185,097Vacaville, California · Unemployment rate: 6.0% · Margin of error: 1.1% · Unemployed: 2,871 · Civilian labor force: 48,238 · Employed: 45,367 · In labor force: 49,982 · Not in labor force: 31,884 · Population 16 years and over: 81,866 · Total population: 102,085Ontario, California · Unemployment rate: 6.0% · Margin of error: 0.7% · Unemployed: 5,488 · Civilian labor force: 92,113 · Employed: 86,625 · In labor force: 92,126 · Not in labor force: 46,824 · Population 16 years and over: 138,950 · Total population: 178,347Spokane, Washington · Unemployment rate: 6.0% · Margin of error: 0.5% · Unemployed: 6,934 · Civilian labor force: 116,271 · Employed: 109,337 · In labor force: 116,894 · Not in labor force: 70,822 · Population 16 years and over: 187,716 · Total population: 229,228East Los Angeles, California · Unemployment rate: 6.0% · Margin of error: 1.0% · Unemployed: 3,367 · Civilian labor force: 56,340 · Employed: 52,973 · In labor force: 56,340 · Not in labor force: 33,791 · Population 16 years and over: 90,131 · Total population: 114,617Riverside, California · Unemployment rate: 6.0% · Margin of error: 0.6% · Unemployed: 9,680 · Civilian labor force: 161,950 · Employed: 152,270 · In labor force: 162,198 · Not in labor force: 89,073 · Population 16 years and over: 251,271 · Total population: 316,241Richmond, Virginia · Unemployment rate: 6.0% · Margin of error: 0.6% · Unemployed: 7,808 · Civilian labor force: 130,491 · Employed: 122,683 · In labor force: 131,106 · Not in labor force: 60,232 · Population 16 years and over: 191,338 · Total population: 227,595Oakland, California · Unemployment rate: 6.0% · Margin of error: 0.4% · Unemployed: 14,809 · Civilian labor force: 247,226 · Employed: 232,417 · In labor force: 247,557 · Not in labor force: 114,871 · Population 16 years and over: 362,428 · Total population: 438,072Clarksville, Tennessee · Unemployment rate: 6.0% · Margin of error: 0.8% · Unemployed: 4,579 · Civilian labor force: 76,377 · Employed: 71,798 · In labor force: 87,822 · Not in labor force: 41,957 · Population 16 years and over: 129,779 · Total population: 171,897Independence, Missouri · Unemployment rate: 6.0% · Margin of error: 1.1% · Unemployed: 3,653 · Civilian labor force: 60,822 · Employed: 57,169 · In labor force: 60,872 · Not in labor force: 35,739 · Population 16 years and over: 96,611 · Total population: 121,944South Bend, Indiana · Unemployment rate: 6.0% · Margin of error: 0.9% · Unemployed: 3,002 · Civilian labor force: 49,935 · Employed: 46,933 · In labor force: 49,983 · Not in labor force: 29,303 · Population 16 years and over: 79,286 · Total population: 102,866Boston, Massachusetts · Unemployment rate: 6.0% · Margin of error: 0.4% · Unemployed: 24,252 · Civilian labor force: 403,405 · Employed: 379,153 · In labor force: 403,888 · Not in labor force: 169,302 · Population 16 years and over: 573,190 · Total population: 663,972Berkeley, California · Unemployment rate: 6.0% · Margin of error: 0.8% · Unemployed: 3,980 · Civilian labor force: 66,114 · Employed: 62,134 · In labor force: 66,168 · Not in labor force: 41,660 · Population 16 years and over: 107,828 · Total population: 120,223Boulder, Colorado · Unemployment rate: 6.1% · Margin of error: 0.8% · Unemployed: 3,708 · Civilian labor force: 61,177 · Employed: 57,469 · In labor force: 61,216 · Not in labor force: 34,534 · Population 16 years and over: 95,750 · Total population: 106,274Birmingham, Alabama · Unemployment rate: 6.1% · Margin of error: 0.7% · Unemployed: 5,872 · Civilian labor force: 96,828 · Employed: 90,956 · In labor force: 97,022 · Not in labor force: 68,781 · Population 16 years and over: 165,803 · Total population: 199,322Tulsa, Oklahoma · Unemployment rate: 6.1% · Margin of error: 0.3% · Unemployed: 12,687 · Civilian labor force: 209,114 · Employed: 196,427 · In labor force: 209,604 · Not in labor force: 113,745 · Population 16 years and over: 323,349 · Total population: 412,322Norfolk, Virginia · Unemployment rate: 6.1% · Margin of error: 0.5% · Unemployed: 6,678 · Civilian labor force: 109,583 · Employed: 102,905 · In labor force: 134,371 · Not in labor force: 56,909 · Population 16 years and over: 191,280 · Total population: 235,037Brownsville, Texas · Unemployment rate: 6.1% · Margin of error: 0.6% · Unemployed: 5,048 · Civilian labor force: 82,712 · Employed: 77,664 · In labor force: 82,784 · Not in labor force: 57,262 · Population 16 years and over: 140,046 · Total population: 188,023Enterprise, Nevada · Unemployment rate: 6.1% · Margin of error: 0.7% · Unemployed: 8,124 · Civilian labor force: 132,774 · Employed: 124,650 · In labor force: 133,145 · Not in labor force: 49,697 · Population 16 years and over: 182,842 · Total population: 232,043Spring Hill, Florida · Unemployment rate: 6.1% · Margin of error: 1.0% · Unemployed: 3,236 · Civilian labor force: 52,750 · Employed: 49,514 · In labor force: 52,793 · Not in labor force: 45,119 · Population 16 years and over: 97,912 · Total population: 118,814Sacramento, California · Unemployment rate: 6.2% · Margin of error: 0.4% · Unemployed: 16,902 · Civilian labor force: 274,419 · Employed: 257,517 · In labor force: 275,106 · Not in labor force: 149,600 · Population 16 years and over: 424,706 · Total population: 524,802El Paso, Texas · Unemployment rate: 6.2% · Margin of error: 0.4% · Unemployed: 19,623 · Civilian labor force: 317,111 · Employed: 297,488 · In labor force: 328,743 · Not in labor force: 197,765 · Population 16 years and over: 526,508 · Total population: 678,147Sterling Heights, Michigan · Unemployment rate: 6.2% · Margin of error: 1.0% · Unemployed: 4,245 · Civilian labor force: 68,450 · Employed: 64,205 · In labor force: 68,559 · Not in labor force: 42,283 · Population 16 years and over: 110,842 · Total population: 133,473West Covina, California · Unemployment rate: 6.2% · Margin of error: 0.8% · Unemployed: 3,482 · Civilian labor force: 56,138 · Employed: 52,656 · In labor force: 56,207 · Not in labor force: 32,135 · Population 16 years and over: 88,342 · Total population: 107,436Carlsbad, California · Unemployment rate: 6.3% · Margin of error: 1.3% · Unemployed: 3,637 · Civilian labor force: 58,086 · Employed: 54,449 · In labor force: 59,048 · Not in labor force: 32,302 · Population 16 years and over: 91,350 · Total population: 114,500Hollywood, Florida · Unemployment rate: 6.3% · Margin of error: 0.9% · Unemployed: 5,406 · Civilian labor force: 85,968 · Employed: 80,562 · In labor force: 86,028 · Not in labor force: 40,735 · Population 16 years and over: 126,763 · Total population: 152,935Pomona, California · Unemployment rate: 6.3% · Margin of error: 0.8% · Unemployed: 4,690 · Civilian labor force: 74,292 · Employed: 69,602 · In labor force: 74,346 · Not in labor force: 43,213 · Population 16 years and over: 117,559 · Total population: 148,391Hampton, Virginia · Unemployment rate: 6.3% · Margin of error: 1.0% · Unemployed: 4,240 · Civilian labor force: 67,155 · Employed: 62,915 · In labor force: 73,332 · Not in labor force: 37,571 · Population 16 years and over: 110,903 · Total population: 137,334Elgin, Illinois · Unemployment rate: 6.3% · Margin of error: 1.0% · Unemployed: 3,886 · Civilian labor force: 61,233 · Employed: 57,347 · In labor force: 61,339 · Not in labor force: 27,307 · Population 16 years and over: 88,646 · Total population: 114,106Worcester, Massachusetts · Unemployment rate: 6.4% · Margin of error: 0.6% · Unemployed: 6,997 · Civilian labor force: 109,826 · Employed: 102,829 · In labor force: 109,932 · Not in labor force: 59,333 · Population 16 years and over: 169,265 · Total population: 205,501Tucson, Arizona · Unemployment rate: 6.4% · Margin of error: 0.5% · Unemployed: 17,364 · Civilian labor force: 272,375 · Employed: 255,011 · In labor force: 278,010 · Not in labor force: 169,634 · Population 16 years and over: 447,644 · Total population: 543,348Jurupa Valley, California · Unemployment rate: 6.4% · Margin of error: 1.0% · Unemployed: 3,354 · Civilian labor force: 52,207 · Employed: 48,853 · In labor force: 52,226 · Not in labor force: 29,888 · Population 16 years and over: 82,114 · Total population: 106,244El Monte, California · Unemployment rate: 6.4% · Margin of error: 0.9% · Unemployed: 3,368 · Civilian labor force: 52,417 · Employed: 49,049 · In labor force: 52,430 · Not in labor force: 33,830 · Population 16 years and over: 86,260 · Total population: 107,066Montgomery, Alabama · Unemployment rate: 6.4% · Margin of error: 0.9% · Unemployed: 5,879 · Civilian labor force: 91,175 · Employed: 85,296 · In labor force: 93,419 · Not in labor force: 62,733 · Population 16 years and over: 156,152 · Total population: 198,440Long Beach, California · Unemployment rate: 6.5% · Margin of error: 0.5% · Unemployed: 16,159 · Civilian labor force: 250,493 · Employed: 234,334 · In labor force: 250,819 · Not in labor force: 125,953 · Population 16 years and over: 376,772 · Total population: 458,491Tallahassee, Florida · Unemployment rate: 6.5% · Margin of error: 0.7% · Unemployed: 7,292 · Civilian labor force: 112,837 · Employed: 105,545 · In labor force: 113,129 · Not in labor force: 57,012 · Population 16 years and over: 170,141 · Total population: 199,696Columbus, Georgia · Unemployment rate: 6.5% · Margin of error: 0.7% · Unemployed: 5,775 · Civilian labor force: 89,294 · Employed: 83,519 · In labor force: 96,126 · Not in labor force: 62,453 · Population 16 years and over: 158,579 · Total population: 204,383Washington, District of Columbia · Unemployment rate: 6.5% · Margin of error: 0.4% · Unemployed: 25,748 · Civilian labor force: 397,158 · Employed: 371,410 · In labor force: 400,621 · Not in labor force: 155,956 · Population 16 years and over: 556,577 · Total population: 672,079San Bernardino, California · Unemployment rate: 6.5% · Margin of error: 0.6% · Unemployed: 6,645 · Civilian labor force: 102,378 · Employed: 95,733 · In labor force: 102,871 · Not in labor force: 65,876 · Population 16 years and over: 168,747 · Total population: 221,774Fullerton, California · Unemployment rate: 6.5% · Margin of error: 1.0% · Unemployed: 4,802 · Civilian labor force: 73,737 · Employed: 68,935 · In labor force: 73,779 · Not in labor force: 38,885 · Population 16 years and over: 112,664 · Total population: 141,278Baltimore, Maryland · Unemployment rate: 6.6% · Margin of error: 0.5% · Unemployed: 19,141 · Civilian labor force: 292,156 · Employed: 273,015 · In labor force: 292,915 · Not in labor force: 176,130 · Population 16 years and over: 469,045 · Total population: 577,193Chico, California · Unemployment rate: 6.6% · Margin of error: 1.0% · Unemployed: 3,699 · Civilian labor force: 56,238 · Employed: 52,539 · In labor force: 56,343 · Not in labor force: 28,973 · Population 16 years and over: 85,316 · Total population: 102,032Edinburg, Texas · Unemployment rate: 6.6% · Margin of error: 1.4% · Unemployed: 3,095 · Civilian labor force: 46,885 · Employed: 43,790 · In labor force: 47,122 · Not in labor force: 29,375 · Population 16 years and over: 76,497 · Total population: 102,561Oxnard, California · Unemployment rate: 6.6% · Margin of error: 0.7% · Unemployed: 6,783 · Civilian labor force: 102,499 · Employed: 95,716 · In labor force: 103,305 · Not in labor force: 50,451 · Population 16 years and over: 153,756 · Total population: 201,014Houston, Texas · Unemployment rate: 6.7% · Margin of error: 0.3% · Unemployed: 81,354 · Civilian labor force: 1,218,145 · Employed: 1,136,791 · In labor force: 1,219,957 · Not in labor force: 597,430 · Population 16 years and over: 1,817,387 · Total population: 2,300,419Savannah, Georgia · Unemployment rate: 6.7% · Margin of error: 0.8% · Unemployed: 5,033 · Civilian labor force: 75,343 · Employed: 70,310 · In labor force: 77,126 · Not in labor force: 42,783 · Population 16 years and over: 119,909 · Total population: 147,546Elk Grove, California · Unemployment rate: 6.7% · Margin of error: 0.9% · Unemployed: 6,021 · Civilian labor force: 90,050 · Employed: 84,029 · In labor force: 90,254 · Not in labor force: 47,339 · Population 16 years and over: 137,593 · Total population: 177,221Vallejo, California · Unemployment rate: 6.7% · Margin of error: 0.9% · Unemployed: 4,293 · Civilian labor force: 63,896 · Employed: 59,603 · In labor force: 64,211 · Not in labor force: 37,773 · Population 16 years and over: 101,984 · Total population: 124,637Henderson, Nevada · Unemployment rate: 6.7% · Margin of error: 0.6% · Unemployed: 10,704 · Civilian labor force: 159,013 · Employed: 148,309 · In labor force: 159,844 · Not in labor force: 103,923 · Population 16 years and over: 263,767 · Total population: 324,523Springfield, Illinois · Unemployment rate: 6.7% · Margin of error: 1.0% · Unemployed: 3,713 · Civilian labor force: 55,088 · Employed: 51,375 · In labor force: 55,195 · Not in labor force: 37,130 · Population 16 years and over: 92,325 · Total population: 113,714Fontana, California · Unemployment rate: 6.8% · Margin of error: 0.6% · Unemployed: 7,253 · Civilian labor force: 107,212 · Employed: 99,959 · In labor force: 107,372 · Not in labor force: 53,856 · Population 16 years and over: 161,228 · Total population: 211,921Cincinnati, Ohio · Unemployment rate: 6.8% · Margin of error: 0.6% · Unemployed: 11,258 · Civilian labor force: 166,335 · Employed: 155,077 · In labor force: 166,639 · Not in labor force: 86,309 · Population 16 years and over: 252,948 · Total population: 309,595Menifee, California · Unemployment rate: 6.8% · Margin of error: 1.2% · Unemployed: 3,238 · Civilian labor force: 47,560 · Employed: 44,322 · In labor force: 48,192 · Not in labor force: 34,643 · Population 16 years and over: 82,835 · Total population: 107,020Dearborn, Michigan · Unemployment rate: 6.8% · Margin of error: 0.9% · Unemployed: 3,109 · Civilian labor force: 45,490 · Employed: 42,381 · In labor force: 45,490 · Not in labor force: 35,184 · Population 16 years and over: 80,674 · Total population: 107,846Elizabeth, New Jersey · Unemployment rate: 6.9% · Margin of error: 0.9% · Unemployed: 4,856 · Civilian labor force: 70,629 · Employed: 65,773 · In labor force: 70,652 · Not in labor force: 34,182 · Population 16 years and over: 104,834 · Total population: 135,887Burbank, California · Unemployment rate: 6.9% · Margin of error: 0.8% · Unemployed: 4,020 · Civilian labor force: 57,941 · Employed: 53,921 · In labor force: 57,946 · Not in labor force: 29,231 · Population 16 years and over: 87,177 · Total population: 105,165Bakersfield, California · Unemployment rate: 7.0% · Margin of error: 0.5% · Unemployed: 13,107 · Civilian labor force: 187,794 · Employed: 174,687 · In labor force: 188,139 · Not in labor force: 111,935 · Population 16 years and over: 300,074 · Total population: 408,366Richmond, California · Unemployment rate: 7.0% · Margin of error: 1.1% · Unemployed: 4,365 · Civilian labor force: 62,039 · Employed: 57,674 · In labor force: 62,138 · Not in labor force: 31,664 · Population 16 years and over: 93,802 · Total population: 115,396Tuscaloosa, Alabama · Unemployment rate: 7.0% · Margin of error: 1.3% · Unemployed: 3,701 · Civilian labor force: 52,517 · Employed: 48,816 · In labor force: 52,601 · Not in labor force: 38,061 · Population 16 years and over: 90,662 · Total population: 107,699Murrieta, California · Unemployment rate: 7.1% · Margin of error: 1.1% · Unemployed: 3,756 · Civilian labor force: 53,221 · Employed: 49,465 · In labor force: 54,062 · Not in labor force: 31,357 · Population 16 years and over: 85,419 · Total population: 111,621Santa Maria, California · Unemployment rate: 7.1% · Margin of error: 1.0% · Unemployed: 3,725 · Civilian labor force: 52,701 · Employed: 48,976 · In labor force: 53,056 · Not in labor force: 26,682 · Population 16 years and over: 79,738 · Total population: 109,880Antioch, California · Unemployment rate: 7.1% · Margin of error: 1.3% · Unemployed: 4,311 · Civilian labor force: 60,533 · Employed: 56,222 · In labor force: 60,578 · Not in labor force: 32,235 · Population 16 years and over: 92,813 · Total population: 115,759Quincy, Massachusetts · Unemployment rate: 7.1% · Margin of error: 1.2% · Unemployed: 4,427 · Civilian labor force: 62,074 · Employed: 57,647 · In labor force: 62,232 · Not in labor force: 25,696 · Population 16 years and over: 87,928 · Total population: 101,361Lancaster, California · Unemployment rate: 7.1% · Margin of error: 0.9% · Unemployed: 5,072 · Civilian labor force: 70,958 · Employed: 65,886 · In labor force: 71,275 · Not in labor force: 58,443 · Population 16 years and over: 129,718 · Total population: 170,013Buffalo, New York · Unemployment rate: 7.2% · Margin of error: 0.6% · Unemployed: 9,508 · Civilian labor force: 132,150 · Employed: 122,642 · In labor force: 132,325 · Not in labor force: 88,460 · Population 16 years and over: 220,785 · Total population: 276,397Las Vegas, Nevada · Unemployment rate: 7.2% · Margin of error: 0.4% · Unemployed: 23,277 · Civilian labor force: 322,664 · Employed: 299,387 · In labor force: 326,677 · Not in labor force: 193,930 · Population 16 years and over: 520,607 · Total population: 650,873Modesto, California · Unemployment rate: 7.3% · Margin of error: 0.7% · Unemployed: 7,550 · Civilian labor force: 103,201 · Employed: 95,651 · In labor force: 103,220 · Not in labor force: 64,324 · Population 16 years and over: 167,544 · Total population: 218,614Kent, Washington · Unemployment rate: 7.3% · Margin of error: 1.2% · Unemployed: 5,406 · Civilian labor force: 73,832 · Employed: 68,426 · In labor force: 73,926 · Not in labor force: 31,500 · Population 16 years and over: 105,426 · Total population: 135,015Moreno Valley, California · Unemployment rate: 7.4% · Margin of error: 0.7% · Unemployed: 7,538 · Civilian labor force: 102,152 · Employed: 94,614 · In labor force: 102,591 · Not in labor force: 56,918 · Population 16 years and over: 159,509 · Total population: 210,378South Fulton, Georgia · Unemployment rate: 7.4% · Margin of error: 2.0% · Unemployed: 4,343 · Civilian labor force: 58,757 · Employed: 54,414 · In labor force: 59,017 · Not in labor force: 25,561 · Population 16 years and over: 84,578 · Total population: 109,157Palmdale, California · Unemployment rate: 7.4% · Margin of error: 0.8% · Unemployed: 5,564 · Civilian labor force: 75,233 · Employed: 69,669 · In labor force: 75,364 · Not in labor force: 47,063 · Population 16 years and over: 122,427 · Total population: 165,487Yonkers, New York · Unemployment rate: 7.4% · Margin of error: 0.9% · Unemployed: 8,154 · Civilian labor force: 110,021 · Employed: 101,867 · In labor force: 110,043 · Not in labor force: 60,434 · Population 16 years and over: 170,477 · Total population: 209,529Warren, Michigan · Unemployment rate: 7.4% · Margin of error: 0.9% · Unemployed: 5,275 · Civilian labor force: 71,106 · Employed: 65,831 · In labor force: 71,133 · Not in labor force: 39,558 · Population 16 years and over: 110,691 · Total population: 138,128Providence, Rhode Island · Unemployment rate: 7.4% · Margin of error: 1.0% · Unemployed: 7,468 · Civilian labor force: 100,503 · Employed: 93,035 · In labor force: 100,702 · Not in labor force: 55,625 · Population 16 years and over: 156,327 · Total population: 190,214Las Cruces, New Mexico · Unemployment rate: 7.4% · Margin of error: 1.2% · Unemployed: 3,998 · Civilian labor force: 53,763 · Employed: 49,765 · In labor force: 54,188 · Not in labor force: 36,624 · Population 16 years and over: 90,812 · Total population: 112,612Syracuse, New York · Unemployment rate: 7.4% · Margin of error: 0.9% · Unemployed: 5,037 · Civilian labor force: 67,616 · Employed: 62,579 · In labor force: 67,768 · Not in labor force: 50,784 · Population 16 years and over: 118,552 · Total population: 146,211Spring Valley, Nevada · Unemployment rate: 7.5% · Margin of error: 0.8% · Unemployed: 9,254 · Civilian labor force: 123,449 · Employed: 114,195 · In labor force: 123,578 · Not in labor force: 59,553 · Population 16 years and over: 183,131 · Total population: 219,913Macon-Bibb County, Georgia · Unemployment rate: 7.5% · Margin of error: 1.0% · Unemployed: 5,221 · Civilian labor force: 69,565 · Employed: 64,344 · In labor force: 69,970 · Not in labor force: 52,224 · Population 16 years and over: 122,194 · Total population: 156,543New Bedford, Massachusetts · Unemployment rate: 7.6% · Margin of error: 1.0% · Unemployed: 3,741 · Civilian labor force: 49,136 · Employed: 45,395 · In labor force: 49,178 · Not in labor force: 30,451 · Population 16 years and over: 79,629 · Total population: 100,731Columbia, South Carolina · Unemployment rate: 7.6% · Margin of error: 1.2% · Unemployed: 5,296 · Civilian labor force: 69,495 · Employed: 64,199 · In labor force: 76,809 · Not in labor force: 40,714 · Population 16 years and over: 117,523 · Total population: 138,019Eugene, Oregon · Unemployment rate: 7.6% · Margin of error: 0.9% · Unemployed: 7,334 · Civilian labor force: 96,044 · Employed: 88,710 · In labor force: 96,060 · Not in labor force: 56,331 · Population 16 years and over: 152,391 · Total population: 177,520New York, New York · Unemployment rate: 7.7% · Margin of error: 0.1% · Unemployed: 337,932 · Civilian labor force: 4,408,428 · Employed: 4,070,496 · In labor force: 4,412,075 · Not in labor force: 2,548,891 · Population 16 years and over: 6,960,966 · Total population: 8,516,202New Haven, Connecticut · Unemployment rate: 7.7% · Margin of error: 1.1% · Unemployed: 5,319 · Civilian labor force: 69,034 · Employed: 63,715 · In labor force: 69,078 · Not in labor force: 38,550 · Population 16 years and over: 107,628 · Total population: 132,893Peoria, Illinois · Unemployment rate: 7.8% · Margin of error: 1.0% · Unemployed: 4,268 · Civilian labor force: 54,651 · Employed: 50,383 · In labor force: 54,760 · Not in labor force: 32,852 · Population 16 years and over: 87,612 · Total population: 112,126New Orleans, Louisiana · Unemployment rate: 7.8% · Margin of error: 0.7% · Unemployed: 14,808 · Civilian labor force: 188,830 · Employed: 174,022 · In labor force: 190,228 · Not in labor force: 119,225 · Population 16 years and over: 309,453 · Total population: 376,035Augusta-Richmond County consolidated government (balance), Georgia · Unemployment rate: 7.9% · Margin of error: 1.1% · Unemployed: 7,258 · Civilian labor force: 92,048 · Employed: 84,790 · In labor force: 99,380 · Not in labor force: 60,587 · Population 16 years and over: 159,967 · Total population: 201,504Rochester, New York · Unemployment rate: 7.9% · Margin of error: 0.7% · Unemployed: 8,384 · Civilian labor force: 105,873 · Employed: 97,489 · In labor force: 105,967 · Not in labor force: 63,687 · Population 16 years and over: 169,654 · Total population: 209,720Chicago, Illinois · Unemployment rate: 7.9% · Margin of error: 0.2% · Unemployed: 118,928 · Civilian labor force: 1,501,562 · Employed: 1,382,634 · In labor force: 1,502,336 · Not in labor force: 729,130 · Population 16 years and over: 2,231,466 · Total population: 2,707,648Los Angeles, California · Unemployment rate: 7.9% · Margin of error: 0.2% · Unemployed: 168,363 · Civilian labor force: 2,123,186 · Employed: 1,954,823 · In labor force: 2,124,954 · Not in labor force: 1,066,147 · Population 16 years and over: 3,191,101 · Total population: 3,857,897Inglewood, California · Unemployment rate: 7.9% · Margin of error: 1.1% · Unemployed: 4,575 · Civilian labor force: 57,650 · Employed: 53,075 · In labor force: 57,825 · Not in labor force: 28,164 · Population 16 years and over: 85,989 · Total population: 105,575Stockton, California · Unemployment rate: 8.0% · Margin of error: 0.6% · Unemployed: 11,887 · Civilian labor force: 149,004 · Employed: 137,117 · In labor force: 149,126 · Not in labor force: 94,908 · Population 16 years and over: 244,034 · Total population: 320,470Akron, Ohio · Unemployment rate: 8.0% · Margin of error: 0.9% · Unemployed: 7,804 · Civilian labor force: 97,098 · Employed: 89,294 · In labor force: 97,205 · Not in labor force: 55,916 · Population 16 years and over: 153,121 · Total population: 189,526Lansing, Michigan · Unemployment rate: 8.1% · Margin of error: 1.1% · Unemployed: 4,925 · Civilian labor force: 61,142 · Employed: 56,217 · In labor force: 61,151 · Not in labor force: 29,071 · Population 16 years and over: 90,222 · Total population: 112,546North Las Vegas, Nevada · Unemployment rate: 8.1% · Margin of error: 0.9% · Unemployed: 10,760 · Civilian labor force: 133,061 · Employed: 122,301 · In labor force: 135,938 · Not in labor force: 72,730 · Population 16 years and over: 208,668 · Total population: 270,773Springfield, Massachusetts · Unemployment rate: 8.2% · Margin of error: 1.2% · Unemployed: 5,702 · Civilian labor force: 69,806 · Employed: 64,104 · In labor force: 69,874 · Not in labor force: 51,192 · Population 16 years and over: 121,066 · Total population: 154,751Glendale, California · Unemployment rate: 8.2% · Margin of error: 0.8% · Unemployed: 8,226 · Civilian labor force: 100,663 · Employed: 92,437 · In labor force: 100,663 · Not in labor force: 60,827 · Population 16 years and over: 161,490 · Total population: 192,270Fayetteville, North Carolina · Unemployment rate: 8.2% · Margin of error: 0.8% · Unemployed: 6,762 · Civilian labor force: 82,268 · Employed: 75,506 · In labor force: 109,766 · Not in labor force: 54,514 · Population 16 years and over: 164,280 · Total population: 209,692Miami Gardens, Florida · Unemployment rate: 8.2% · Margin of error: 1.5% · Unemployed: 4,498 · Civilian labor force: 54,713 · Employed: 50,215 · In labor force: 54,742 · Not in labor force: 33,462 · Population 16 years and over: 88,204 · Total population: 111,264Pompano Beach, Florida · Unemployment rate: 8.2% · Margin of error: 1.9% · Unemployed: 4,875 · Civilian labor force: 59,131 · Employed: 54,256 · In labor force: 59,285 · Not in labor force: 33,794 · Population 16 years and over: 93,079 · Total population: 112,212Memphis, Tennessee · Unemployment rate: 8.3% · Margin of error: 0.5% · Unemployed: 25,647 · Civilian labor force: 310,744 · Employed: 285,097 · In labor force: 311,652 · Not in labor force: 176,082 · Population 16 years and over: 487,734 · Total population: 629,063Albany, New York · Unemployment rate: 8.3% · Margin of error: 1.1% · Unemployed: 4,582 · Civilian labor force: 55,386 · Employed: 50,804 · In labor force: 55,465 · Not in labor force: 31,669 · Population 16 years and over: 87,134 · Total population: 100,081Brockton, Massachusetts · Unemployment rate: 8.3% · Margin of error: 1.1% · Unemployed: 4,560 · Civilian labor force: 55,034 · Employed: 50,474 · In labor force: 55,106 · Not in labor force: 26,418 · Population 16 years and over: 81,524 · Total population: 105,080Philadelphia, Pennsylvania · Unemployment rate: 8.4% · Margin of error: 0.4% · Unemployed: 68,006 · Civilian labor force: 809,321 · Employed: 741,315 · In labor force: 810,038 · Not in labor force: 467,129 · Population 16 years and over: 1,277,167 · Total population: 1,582,432Rialto, California · Unemployment rate: 8.4% · Margin of error: 1.3% · Unemployed: 4,311 · Civilian labor force: 51,209 · Employed: 46,898 · In labor force: 51,337 · Not in labor force: 27,697 · Population 16 years and over: 79,034 · Total population: 103,866Toledo, Ohio · Unemployment rate: 8.5% · Margin of error: 0.7% · Unemployed: 11,142 · Civilian labor force: 131,779 · Employed: 120,637 · In labor force: 131,971 · Not in labor force: 81,035 · Population 16 years and over: 213,006 · Total population: 268,461Rockford, Illinois · Unemployment rate: 8.6% · Margin of error: 0.8% · Unemployed: 5,978 · Civilian labor force: 69,333 · Employed: 63,355 · In labor force: 69,339 · Not in labor force: 46,281 · Population 16 years and over: 115,620 · Total population: 147,649Fresno, California · Unemployment rate: 8.7% · Margin of error: 0.6% · Unemployed: 22,056 · Civilian labor force: 254,876 · Employed: 232,820 · In labor force: 255,810 · Not in labor force: 152,893 · Population 16 years and over: 408,703 · Total population: 543,615Pasadena, Texas · Unemployment rate: 8.7% · Margin of error: 1.2% · Unemployed: 6,197 · Civilian labor force: 71,263 · Employed: 65,066 · In labor force: 71,347 · Not in labor force: 40,002 · Population 16 years and over: 111,349 · Total population: 149,345Chula Vista, California · Unemployment rate: 8.8% · Margin of error: 0.9% · Unemployed: 12,222 · Civilian labor force: 139,082 · Employed: 126,860 · In labor force: 144,373 · Not in labor force: 71,968 · Population 16 years and over: 216,341 · Total population: 275,030Allentown, Pennsylvania · Unemployment rate: 8.8% · Margin of error: 1.2% · Unemployed: 5,389 · Civilian labor force: 61,061 · Employed: 55,672 · In labor force: 61,089 · Not in labor force: 36,444 · Population 16 years and over: 97,533 · Total population: 125,320Bridgeport, Connecticut · Unemployment rate: 8.9% · Margin of error: 1.0% · Unemployed: 7,080 · Civilian labor force: 79,821 · Employed: 72,741 · In labor force: 79,896 · Not in labor force: 40,381 · Population 16 years and over: 120,277 · Total population: 148,012Shreveport, Louisiana · Unemployment rate: 8.9% · Margin of error: 1.3% · Unemployed: 7,308 · Civilian labor force: 82,327 · Employed: 75,019 · In labor force: 83,240 · Not in labor force: 61,286 · Population 16 years and over: 144,526 · Total population: 183,483Baton Rouge, Louisiana · Unemployment rate: 9.1% · Margin of error: 1.0% · Unemployed: 10,139 · Civilian labor force: 112,001 · Employed: 101,862 · In labor force: 112,199 · Not in labor force: 70,709 · Population 16 years and over: 182,908 · Total population: 223,699Sunrise Manor, Nevada · Unemployment rate: 9.1% · Margin of error: 1.0% · Unemployed: 8,324 · Civilian labor force: 91,109 · Employed: 82,785 · In labor force: 91,491 · Not in labor force: 58,907 · Population 16 years and over: 150,398 · Total population: 199,099El Cajon, California · Unemployment rate: 9.2% · Margin of error: 1.4% · Unemployed: 4,575 · Civilian labor force: 49,821 · Employed: 45,246 · In labor force: 50,332 · Not in labor force: 30,119 · Population 16 years and over: 80,451 · Total population: 104,909Waterbury, Connecticut · Unemployment rate: 9.3% · Margin of error: 1.0% · Unemployed: 5,087 · Civilian labor force: 54,922 · Employed: 49,835 · In labor force: 54,948 · Not in labor force: 36,438 · Population 16 years and over: 91,386 · Total population: 114,356Jackson, Mississippi · Unemployment rate: 9.4% · Margin of error: 1.0% · Unemployed: 6,708 · Civilian labor force: 71,175 · Employed: 64,467 · In labor force: 71,313 · Not in labor force: 46,369 · Population 16 years and over: 117,682 · Total population: 149,827Paradise, Nevada · Unemployment rate: 9.4% · Margin of error: 0.9% · Unemployed: 9,587 · Civilian labor force: 101,702 · Employed: 92,115 · In labor force: 101,839 · Not in labor force: 52,367 · Population 16 years and over: 154,206 · Total population: 186,178Hesperia, California · Unemployment rate: 9.7% · Margin of error: 1.6% · Unemployed: 4,163 · Civilian labor force: 43,049 · Employed: 38,886 · In labor force: 43,084 · Not in labor force: 31,130 · Population 16 years and over: 74,214 · Total population: 100,141Dayton, Ohio · Unemployment rate: 9.7% · Margin of error: 1.0% · Unemployed: 6,229 · Civilian labor force: 63,959 · Employed: 57,730 · In labor force: 64,416 · Not in labor force: 45,631 · Population 16 years and over: 110,047 · Total population: 136,741Paterson, New Jersey · Unemployment rate: 10.2% · Margin of error: 1.1% · Unemployed: 7,667 · Civilian labor force: 74,930 · Employed: 67,263 · In labor force: 75,025 · Not in labor force: 43,694 · Population 16 years and over: 118,719 · Total population: 157,660Killeen, Texas · Unemployment rate: 10.6% · Margin of error: 1.2% · Unemployed: 7,120 · Civilian labor force: 67,448 · Employed: 60,328 · In labor force: 78,779 · Not in labor force: 36,163 · Population 16 years and over: 114,942 · Total population: 156,144Hartford, Connecticut · Unemployment rate: 10.6% · Margin of error: 1.1% · Unemployed: 6,377 · Civilian labor force: 60,315 · Employed: 53,938 · In labor force: 60,411 · Not in labor force: 34,837 · Population 16 years and over: 95,248 · Total population: 119,970Newark, New Jersey · Unemployment rate: 10.9% · Margin of error: 0.9% · Unemployed: 16,147 · Civilian labor force: 148,561 · Employed: 132,414 · In labor force: 148,640 · Not in labor force: 91,205 · Population 16 years and over: 239,845 · Total population: 307,188Cleveland, Ohio · Unemployment rate: 11.5% · Margin of error: 0.7% · Unemployed: 20,486 · Civilian labor force: 178,714 · Employed: 158,228 · In labor force: 178,918 · Not in labor force: 119,518 · Population 16 years and over: 298,436 · Total population: 367,523Victorville, California · Unemployment rate: 11.6% · Margin of error: 2.0% · Unemployed: 6,524 · Civilian labor force: 56,390 · Employed: 49,866 · In labor force: 56,693 · Not in labor force: 42,668 · Population 16 years and over: 99,361 · Total population: 135,983Detroit, Michigan · Unemployment rate: 14.1% · Margin of error: 0.7% · Unemployed: 38,165 · Civilian labor force: 269,746 · Employed: 231,581 · In labor force: 269,860 · Not in labor force: 224,548 · Population 16 years and over: 494,408 · Total population: 636,644New YorkLos AngelesChicagoHoustonPhoenixSan FranciscoSeattleDenverDallasAtlantaMiamiBostonMinneapolisDetroitNew OrleansWashingtonPortlandLas VegasSalt Lake CityKansas CityJacksonvilleCharlotteAnchorageUrban HonoluluUnemployment rate2.3%14.4%
Summary

Darker amber is a higher unemployment rate. Each city is a marked point on the US state map. Alaska and Hawaii are inset. Places without a packaged map dot stay in the ranking and table. Puerto Rico cities are in the ranking and table but are not drawn here.

Among the 346 US cities with at least 100,000 residents, a typical city has an unemployment rate of 5.5%, the midpoint of those 346 rates on the 2023 ACS five-year estimates, so half of these cities sit above that mark and half below. San Juan, Puerto Rico has the highest rate at 14.4%, followed by Detroit, Michigan at 14.1% and Ponce, Puerto Rico at 13.9%. Sioux Falls, South Dakota is the lowest at 2.3%. 122 cities are at or above 6 percent. These are each city's own unemployment rate (unemployed people divided by the civilian labor force for the population 16 years and over), not a national average of cities, and not the monthly BLS figure.

In short

5.5%typical city in this setthe middle of the 346 rates, not an average
14.4%San Juan, Puerto Ricohighest unemployment rate
2.3%Sioux Falls, South Dakotalowest unemployment rate
122cities at or above 6%of 346 cities with 100,000 or more people
12.1 ptsspread, high to lowSan Juan, Puerto Rico versus Sioux Falls, South Dakota
Figure 1

Unemployment rate, all published cities

Unemployment rate · all 346 · ranked high to low

346 items
View100%
DownloadPDFImageCSV
Unemployment rate, all published citiesEvery incorporated or Census place with at least 100,000 residents, 346 in all. San Juan, Puerto Rico leads at 14.4%, then Detroit, Michigan at 14.1% and Ponce, Puerto Rico at 13.9%. Sioux Falls, South Dakota is lowest at 2.3%. The middle city sits at 5.5%. 122 cities reach 6 percent and 40 reach 8 percent. The ranking is each city's own unemployment rate: unemployed people divided by the civilian labor force.0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%Unemployment rate, percent14.4%San Juan, Puerto Rico14.1%Detroit, Michigan13.9%Ponce, Puerto Rico11.9%Carolina, Puerto Rico11.6%Victorville, California11.5%Cleveland, Ohio10.9%Newark, New Jersey10.6%Hartford, Connecticut10.6%Killeen, Texas10.2%Paterson, New Jersey9.7%Dayton, Ohio9.7%Hesperia, California9.4%Paradise, Nevada9.4%Jackson, Mississippi9.3%Waterbury, Connecticut9.2%El Cajon, California9.1%Sunrise Manor, Nevada9.1%Baton Rouge, Louisiana8.9%Shreveport, Louisiana8.9%Bridgeport, Connecticut8.8%Allentown, Pennsylvania8.8%Chula Vista, California8.7%Pasadena, Texas8.7%Bayamón, Puerto Rico8.7%Fresno, California8.6%Rockford, Illinois8.5%Toledo, Ohio8.4%Rialto, California8.4%Philadelphia, Pennsylvania8.3%Brockton, Massachusetts8.3%Albany, New York8.3%Memphis, Tennessee8.2%Pompano Beach, Florida8.2%Miami Gardens, Florida8.2%Fayetteville, North Carolina8.2%Glendale, California8.2%Springfield, Massachusetts8.1%North Las Vegas, Nevada8.1%Lansing, Michigan8.0%Akron, Ohio8.0%Stockton, California7.9%Inglewood, California7.9%Los Angeles, California7.9%Chicago, Illinois7.9%Rochester, New York7.9%Augusta-Richmond County con…7.8%New Orleans, Louisiana7.8%Peoria, Illinois7.7%New Haven, Connecticut7.7%New York, New York7.6%Eugene, Oregon7.6%Columbia, South Carolina7.6%New Bedford, Massachusetts7.5%Macon-Bibb County, Georgia7.5%Spring Valley, Nevada7.4%Syracuse, New York7.4%Las Cruces, New Mexico7.4%Providence, Rhode Island7.4%Warren, Michigan7.4%Yonkers, New York7.4%Palmdale, California7.4%South Fulton, Georgia7.4%Moreno Valley, California7.3%Kent, Washington7.3%Modesto, California7.2%Las Vegas, Nevada7.2%Buffalo, New York7.1%Lancaster, California7.1%Quincy, Massachusetts7.1%Antioch, California7.1%Santa Maria, California7.1%Murrieta, California7.0%Tuscaloosa, Alabama7.0%Richmond, California7.0%Bakersfield, California6.9%Burbank, California6.9%Elizabeth, New Jersey6.8%Dearborn, Michigan6.8%Menifee, California6.8%Cincinnati, Ohio6.8%Fontana, California6.7%Springfield, Illinois6.7%Henderson, Nevada6.7%Vallejo, California6.7%Elk Grove, California6.7%Savannah, Georgia6.7%Houston, Texas6.6%Oxnard, California6.6%Edinburg, Texas6.6%Chico, California6.6%Baltimore, Maryland6.5%Fullerton, California6.5%San Bernardino, California6.5%Washington, District of Col…6.5%Columbus, Georgia6.5%Tallahassee, Florida6.5%Long Beach, California6.4%Montgomery, Alabama6.4%El Monte, California6.4%Jurupa Valley, California6.4%Tucson, Arizona6.4%Worcester, Massachusetts6.3%Elgin, Illinois6.3%Hampton, Virginia6.3%Pomona, California6.3%Hollywood, Florida6.3%Carlsbad, California6.2%West Covina, California6.2%Sterling Heights, Michigan6.2%El Paso, Texas6.2%Sacramento, California6.1%Spring Hill, Florida6.1%Enterprise, Nevada6.1%Brownsville, Texas6.1%Norfolk, Virginia6.1%Tulsa, Oklahoma6.1%Birmingham, Alabama6.1%Boulder, Colorado6.0%Berkeley, California6.0%Boston, Massachusetts6.0%South Bend, Indiana6.0%Independence, Missouri6.0%Clarksville, Tennessee6.0%Oakland, California6.0%Richmond, Virginia6.0%Riverside, California6.0%East Los Angeles, California6.0%Spokane, Washington6.0%Ontario, California6.0%Vacaville, California5.9%Mobile, Alabama5.9%Visalia, California5.9%Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania5.9%Milwaukee, Wisconsin5.9%Palm Bay, Florida5.9%Winston-Salem, North Caroli…5.9%Atlanta, Georgia5.9%Newport News, Virginia5.9%Aurora, Illinois5.9%Clovis, California5.9%Spokane Valley, Washington5.9%Hayward, California5.9%San Diego, California5.9%Pueblo, Colorado5.8%Greeley, Colorado5.8%San Antonio, Texas5.8%Rancho Cucamonga, California5.8%Jersey City, New Jersey5.8%Downey, California5.8%Joliet, Illinois5.7%Des Moines, Iowa5.7%Garden Grove, California5.7%Temecula, California5.7%Norman, Oklahoma5.7%Arlington, Texas5.7%Sparks, Nevada5.7%Wichita, Kansas5.7%Aurora, Colorado5.7%Minneapolis, Minnesota5.6%Tempe, Arizona5.6%San Francisco, California5.6%High Point, North Carolina5.6%Norwalk, California5.6%Vancouver, Washington5.5%Colorado Springs, Colorado5.5%Fort Wayne, Indiana5.5%Portland, Oregon5.5%Irvine, California5.5%Anaheim, California5.5%Kansas City, Kansas5.5%Torrance, California5.5%Port St. Lucie, Florida5.5%McAllen, Texas5.5%Coral Springs, Florida5.5%Odessa, Texas5.5%Santa Rosa, California5.5%Laredo, Texas5.4%Corona, California5.4%Corpus Christi, Texas5.4%West Palm Beach, Florida5.4%Huntington Beach, California5.4%Everett, Washington5.4%Oceanside, California5.4%Lowell, Massachusetts5.3%Fort Lauderdale, Florida5.3%Beaumont, Texas5.3%Tacoma, Washington5.3%Pasadena, California5.3%Gresham, Oregon5.3%Santa Clarita, California5.3%Albuquerque, New Mexico5.3%Fairfield, California5.3%Orlando, Florida5.3%Lehigh Acres, Florida5.3%Evansville, Indiana5.3%Salem, Oregon5.3%Glendale, Arizona5.2%Denton, Texas5.2%Indianapolis city (balance)…5.2%Athens-Clarke County unifie…5.2%Santa Ana, California5.2%Fort Collins, Colorado5.2%Grand Prairie, Texas5.1%Greensboro, North Carolina5.1%Phoenix, Arizona5.1%Columbus, Ohio5.1%Lakeland, Florida5.1%Lafayette, Louisiana5.0%St. Louis, Missouri5.0%Daly City, California5.0%Reno, Nevada5.0%Grand Rapids, Michigan5.0%Lexington-Fayette urban cou…5.0%Louisville/Jefferson County…5.0%San Buenaventura (Ventura),…5.0%Urban Honolulu, Hawaii5.0%Miami, Florida4.9%Thousand Oaks, California4.9%St. Paul, Minnesota4.9%St. Petersburg, Florida4.9%Chattanooga, Tennessee4.9%Stamford, Connecticut4.9%Chesapeake, Virginia4.9%Dallas, Texas4.9%Garland, Texas4.9%Topeka, Kansas4.9%Fort Worth, Texas4.9%The Woodlands, Texas4.9%Costa Mesa, California4.9%Concord, California4.8%Goodyear, Arizona4.8%Roseville, California4.8%College Station, Texas4.8%Rio Rancho, New Mexico4.8%Gainesville, Florida4.8%Davenport, Iowa4.8%Lubbock, Texas4.8%Riverview, Florida4.8%Richardson, Texas4.8%Mesquite, Texas4.8%Concord, North Carolina4.7%Tampa, Florida4.7%Clearwater, Florida4.7%Kansas City, Missouri4.7%Orange, California4.7%Salinas, California4.7%Oklahoma City, Oklahoma4.7%Tyler, Texas4.7%Provo, Utah4.7%San Jose, California4.6%Wilmington, North Carolina4.6%Hillsboro, Oregon4.6%Jacksonville, Florida4.6%Lynn, Massachusetts4.6%Thornton, Colorado4.6%Denver, Colorado4.6%Miramar, Florida4.6%Mesa, Arizona4.6%Anchorage, Alaska4.6%Nashville-Davidson metropol…4.5%Simi Valley, California4.5%Raleigh, North Carolina4.5%Sugar Land, Texas4.5%Lakewood, Colorado4.5%Austin, Texas4.5%Columbia, Maryland4.5%Escondido, California4.5%Renton, Washington4.4%Davie, Florida4.4%Charlotte, North Carolina4.4%Knoxville, Tennessee4.4%Metairie, Louisiana4.4%Santa Clara, California4.4%Waco, Texas4.4%West Valley City, Utah4.3%Huntsville, Alabama4.3%Springfield, Missouri4.3%Fremont, California4.3%Allen, Texas4.3%North Charleston, South Car…4.3%Virginia Beach, Virginia4.3%Irving, Texas4.3%San Mateo, California4.3%Green Bay, Wisconsin4.3%Broken Arrow, Oklahoma4.2%Surprise, Arizona4.2%Little Rock, Arkansas4.2%Brandon, Florida4.2%Seattle, Washington4.2%Naperville, Illinois4.2%Omaha, Nebraska4.2%Frisco, Texas4.2%Pembroke Pines, Florida4.2%Durham, North Carolina4.1%Plano, Texas4.1%San Tan Valley, Arizona4.1%Sunnyvale, California4.1%Cape Coral, Florida4.0%West Jordan, Utah4.0%Bellevue, Washington3.9%Cedar Rapids, Iowa3.9%Lee's Summit, Missouri3.9%Columbia, Missouri3.9%Arvada, Colorado3.9%Fargo, North Dakota3.8%Rochester, Minnesota3.8%Manchester, New Hampshire3.8%Salt Lake City, Utah3.8%Boise City, Idaho3.8%Westminster, Colorado3.7%Sandy Springs, Georgia3.7%Lewisville, Texas3.7%Bend, Oregon3.7%Hialeah, Florida3.7%Highlands Ranch, Colorado3.7%Centennial, Colorado3.6%Chandler, Arizona3.6%Midland, Texas3.6%Round Rock, Texas3.6%League City, Texas3.6%Amarillo, Texas3.6%Ann Arbor, Michigan3.6%Murfreesboro, Tennessee3.5%Billings, Montana3.5%Peoria, Arizona3.5%Wichita Falls, Texas3.5%McKinney, Texas3.4%Scottsdale, Arizona3.4%Charleston, South Carolina3.4%Overland Park, Kansas3.4%Cary, North Carolina3.4%Cambridge, Massachusetts3.4%Alexandria, Virginia3.3%Gilbert, Arizona3.3%Lincoln, Nebraska3.3%Arlington, Virginia3.2%Carrollton, Texas3.1%Pearland, Texas2.8%Fishers, Indiana2.8%Olathe, Kansas2.8%Nampa, Idaho2.7%Carmel, Indiana2.7%Abilene, Texas2.7%Madison, Wisconsin2.4%Meridian, Idaho2.3%Sioux Falls, South Dakota
Summary

Every incorporated or Census place with at least 100,000 residents, 346 in all. San Juan, Puerto Rico leads at 14.4%, then Detroit, Michigan at 14.1% and Ponce, Puerto Rico at 13.9%. Sioux Falls, South Dakota is lowest at 2.3%. The middle city sits at 5.5%. 122 cities reach 6 percent and 40 reach 8 percent. The ranking is each city's own unemployment rate: unemployed people divided by the civilian labor force.

Table 1

All cities

346 rows · 10 columns · sorted by unemployment rate, high to low

346 rows
View100%
DownloadPDFImageCSV
Summary

Unemployment rate, unemployed count, civilian labor force and related employment-status counts for every US city of 100,000 or more on the 2023 ACS five-year estimates. Sort any column or use the filter box to jump to a city by name. Each unemployment rate is that city's own share of the civilian labor force, so those columns cannot be averaged into a United States figure.

All cities
?????????
San Juan, Puerto Rico14.4%0.9%20,775144,645123,870145,105131,641276,746320,691
Detroit, Michigan14.1%0.7%38,165269,746231,581269,860224,548494,408636,644
Ponce, Puerto Rico13.9%1.4%5,00535,89830,89336,03556,77292,807109,765
Carolina, Puerto Rico11.9%1.3%7,55463,48355,92963,79456,303120,097139,051
Victorville, California11.6%2.0%6,52456,39049,86656,69342,66899,361135,983
Cleveland, Ohio11.5%0.7%20,486178,714158,228178,918119,518298,436367,523
Newark, New Jersey10.9%0.9%16,147148,561132,414148,64091,205239,845307,188
Hartford, Connecticut10.6%1.1%6,37760,31553,93860,41134,83795,248119,970
Killeen, Texas10.6%1.2%7,12067,44860,32878,77936,163114,942156,144
Paterson, New Jersey10.2%1.1%7,66774,93067,26375,02543,694118,719157,660
Dayton, Ohio9.7%1.0%6,22963,95957,73064,41645,631110,047136,741
Hesperia, California9.7%1.6%4,16343,04938,88643,08431,13074,214100,141
Paradise, Nevada9.4%0.9%9,587101,70292,115101,83952,367154,206186,178
Jackson, Mississippi9.4%1.0%6,70871,17564,46771,31346,369117,682149,827
Waterbury, Connecticut9.3%1.0%5,08754,92249,83554,94836,43891,386114,356
El Cajon, California9.2%1.4%4,57549,82145,24650,33230,11980,451104,909
Sunrise Manor, Nevada9.1%1.0%8,32491,10982,78591,49158,907150,398199,099
Baton Rouge, Louisiana9.1%1.0%10,139112,001101,862112,19970,709182,908223,699
Shreveport, Louisiana8.9%1.3%7,30882,32775,01983,24061,286144,526183,483
Bridgeport, Connecticut8.9%1.0%7,08079,82172,74179,89640,381120,277148,012
Allentown, Pennsylvania8.8%1.2%5,38961,06155,67261,08936,44497,533125,320
Chula Vista, California8.8%0.9%12,222139,082126,860144,37371,968216,341275,030
Pasadena, Texas8.7%1.2%6,19771,26365,06671,34740,002111,349149,345
Bayamón, Puerto Rico8.7%0.9%5,98468,82662,84269,05775,063144,120167,312
Fresno, California8.7%0.6%22,056254,876232,820255,810152,893408,703543,615
Rockford, Illinois8.6%0.8%5,97869,33363,35569,33946,281115,620147,649
Toledo, Ohio8.5%0.7%11,142131,779120,637131,97181,035213,006268,461
Rialto, California8.4%1.3%4,31151,20946,89851,33727,69779,034103,866
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania8.4%0.4%68,006809,321741,315810,038467,1291,277,1671,582,432
Brockton, Massachusetts8.3%1.1%4,56055,03450,47455,10626,41881,524105,080
Albany, New York8.3%1.1%4,58255,38650,80455,46531,66987,134100,081
Memphis, Tennessee8.3%0.5%25,647310,744285,097311,652176,082487,734629,063
Pompano Beach, Florida8.2%1.9%4,87559,13154,25659,28533,79493,079112,212
Miami Gardens, Florida8.2%1.5%4,49854,71350,21554,74233,46288,204111,264
Fayetteville, North Carolina8.2%0.8%6,76282,26875,506109,76654,514164,280209,692
Glendale, California8.2%0.8%8,226100,66392,437100,66360,827161,490192,270
Springfield, Massachusetts8.2%1.2%5,70269,80664,10469,87451,192121,066154,751
North Las Vegas, Nevada8.1%0.9%10,760133,061122,301135,93872,730208,668270,773
Lansing, Michigan8.1%1.1%4,92561,14256,21761,15129,07190,222112,546
Akron, Ohio8.0%0.9%7,80497,09889,29497,20555,916153,121189,526
Stockton, California8.0%0.6%11,887149,004137,117149,12694,908244,034320,470
Inglewood, California7.9%1.1%4,57557,65053,07557,82528,16485,989105,575
Los Angeles, California7.9%0.2%168,3632,123,1861,954,8232,124,9541,066,1473,191,1013,857,897
Chicago, Illinois7.9%0.2%118,9281,501,5621,382,6341,502,336729,1302,231,4662,707,648
Rochester, New York7.9%0.7%8,384105,87397,489105,96763,687169,654209,720
Augusta-Richmond County consolidated government (balance), Georgia7.9%1.1%7,25892,04884,79099,38060,587159,967201,504
New Orleans, Louisiana7.8%0.7%14,808188,830174,022190,228119,225309,453376,035
Peoria, Illinois7.8%1.0%4,26854,65150,38354,76032,85287,612112,126
New Haven, Connecticut7.7%1.1%5,31969,03463,71569,07838,550107,628132,893
New York, New York7.7%0.1%337,9324,408,4284,070,4964,412,0752,548,8916,960,9668,516,202
Eugene, Oregon7.6%0.9%7,33496,04488,71096,06056,331152,391177,520
Columbia, South Carolina7.6%1.2%5,29669,49564,19976,80940,714117,523138,019
New Bedford, Massachusetts7.6%1.0%3,74149,13645,39549,17830,45179,629100,731
Macon-Bibb County, Georgia7.5%1.0%5,22169,56564,34469,97052,224122,194156,543
Spring Valley, Nevada7.5%0.8%9,254123,449114,195123,57859,553183,131219,913
Syracuse, New York7.4%0.9%5,03767,61662,57967,76850,784118,552146,211
Las Cruces, New Mexico7.4%1.2%3,99853,76349,76554,18836,62490,812112,612
Providence, Rhode Island7.4%1.0%7,468100,50393,035100,70255,625156,327190,214
Warren, Michigan7.4%0.9%5,27571,10665,83171,13339,558110,691138,128
Yonkers, New York7.4%0.9%8,154110,021101,867110,04360,434170,477209,529
Palmdale, California7.4%0.8%5,56475,23369,66975,36447,063122,427165,487
South Fulton, Georgia7.4%2.0%4,34358,75754,41459,01725,56184,578109,157
Moreno Valley, California7.4%0.7%7,538102,15294,614102,59156,918159,509210,378
Kent, Washington7.3%1.2%5,40673,83268,42673,92631,500105,426135,015
Modesto, California7.3%0.7%7,550103,20195,651103,22064,324167,544218,614
Las Vegas, Nevada7.2%0.4%23,277322,664299,387326,677193,930520,607650,873
Buffalo, New York7.2%0.6%9,508132,150122,642132,32588,460220,785276,397
Lancaster, California7.1%0.9%5,07270,95865,88671,27558,443129,718170,013
Quincy, Massachusetts7.1%1.2%4,42762,07457,64762,23225,69687,928101,361
Antioch, California7.1%1.3%4,31160,53356,22260,57832,23592,813115,759
Santa Maria, California7.1%1.0%3,72552,70148,97653,05626,68279,738109,880
Murrieta, California7.1%1.1%3,75653,22149,46554,06231,35785,419111,621
Tuscaloosa, Alabama7.0%1.3%3,70152,51748,81652,60138,06190,662107,699
Richmond, California7.0%1.1%4,36562,03957,67462,13831,66493,802115,396
Bakersfield, California7.0%0.5%13,107187,794174,687188,139111,935300,074408,366
Burbank, California6.9%0.8%4,02057,94153,92157,94629,23187,177105,165
Elizabeth, New Jersey6.9%0.9%4,85670,62965,77370,65234,182104,834135,887
Dearborn, Michigan6.8%0.9%3,10945,49042,38145,49035,18480,674107,846
Menifee, California6.8%1.2%3,23847,56044,32248,19234,64382,835107,020
Cincinnati, Ohio6.8%0.6%11,258166,335155,077166,63986,309252,948309,595
Fontana, California6.8%0.6%7,253107,21299,959107,37253,856161,228211,921
Springfield, Illinois6.7%1.0%3,71355,08851,37555,19537,13092,325113,714
Henderson, Nevada6.7%0.6%10,704159,013148,309159,844103,923263,767324,523
Vallejo, California6.7%0.9%4,29363,89659,60364,21137,773101,984124,637
Elk Grove, California6.7%0.9%6,02190,05084,02990,25447,339137,593177,221
Savannah, Georgia6.7%0.8%5,03375,34370,31077,12642,783119,909147,546
Houston, Texas6.7%0.3%81,3541,218,1451,136,7911,219,957597,4301,817,3872,300,419
Oxnard, California6.6%0.7%6,783102,49995,716103,30550,451153,756201,014
Edinburg, Texas6.6%1.4%3,09546,88543,79047,12229,37576,497102,561
Chico, California6.6%1.0%3,69956,23852,53956,34328,97385,316102,032
Baltimore, Maryland6.6%0.5%19,141292,156273,015292,915176,130469,045577,193
Fullerton, California6.5%1.0%4,80273,73768,93573,77938,885112,664141,278
San Bernardino, California6.5%0.6%6,645102,37895,733102,87165,876168,747221,774
Washington, District of Columbia6.5%0.4%25,748397,158371,410400,621155,956556,577672,079
Columbus, Georgia6.5%0.7%5,77589,29483,51996,12662,453158,579204,383
Tallahassee, Florida6.5%0.7%7,292112,837105,545113,12957,012170,141199,696
Long Beach, California6.5%0.5%16,159250,493234,334250,819125,953376,772458,491
Montgomery, Alabama6.4%0.9%5,87991,17585,29693,41962,733156,152198,440
El Monte, California6.4%0.9%3,36852,41749,04952,43033,83086,260107,066
Jurupa Valley, California6.4%1.0%3,35452,20748,85352,22629,88882,114106,244
Tucson, Arizona6.4%0.5%17,364272,375255,011278,010169,634447,644543,348
Worcester, Massachusetts6.4%0.6%6,997109,826102,829109,93259,333169,265205,501
Elgin, Illinois6.3%1.0%3,88661,23357,34761,33927,30788,646114,106
Hampton, Virginia6.3%1.0%4,24067,15562,91573,33237,571110,903137,334
Pomona, California6.3%0.8%4,69074,29269,60274,34643,213117,559148,391
Hollywood, Florida6.3%0.9%5,40685,96880,56286,02840,735126,763152,935
Carlsbad, California6.3%1.3%3,63758,08654,44959,04832,30291,350114,500
West Covina, California6.2%0.8%3,48256,13852,65656,20732,13588,342107,436
Sterling Heights, Michigan6.2%1.0%4,24568,45064,20568,55942,283110,842133,473
El Paso, Texas6.2%0.4%19,623317,111297,488328,743197,765526,508678,147
Sacramento, California6.2%0.4%16,902274,419257,517275,106149,600424,706524,802
Spring Hill, Florida6.1%1.0%3,23652,75049,51452,79345,11997,912118,814
Enterprise, Nevada6.1%0.7%8,124132,774124,650133,14549,697182,842232,043
Brownsville, Texas6.1%0.6%5,04882,71277,66482,78457,262140,046188,023
Norfolk, Virginia6.1%0.5%6,678109,583102,905134,37156,909191,280235,037
Tulsa, Oklahoma6.1%0.3%12,687209,114196,427209,604113,745323,349412,322
Birmingham, Alabama6.1%0.7%5,87296,82890,95697,02268,781165,803199,322
Boulder, Colorado6.1%0.8%3,70861,17757,46961,21634,53495,750106,274
Berkeley, California6.0%0.8%3,98066,11462,13466,16841,660107,828120,223
Boston, Massachusetts6.0%0.4%24,252403,405379,153403,888169,302573,190663,972
South Bend, Indiana6.0%0.9%3,00249,93546,93349,98329,30379,286102,866
Independence, Missouri6.0%1.1%3,65360,82257,16960,87235,73996,611121,944
Clarksville, Tennessee6.0%0.8%4,57976,37771,79887,82241,957129,779171,897
Oakland, California6.0%0.4%14,809247,226232,417247,557114,871362,428438,072
Richmond, Virginia6.0%0.6%7,808130,491122,683131,10660,232191,338227,595
Riverside, California6.0%0.6%9,680161,950152,270162,19889,073251,271316,241
East Los Angeles, California6.0%1.0%3,36756,34052,97356,34033,79190,131114,617
Spokane, Washington6.0%0.5%6,934116,271109,337116,89470,822187,716229,228
Ontario, California6.0%0.7%5,48892,11386,62592,12646,824138,950178,347
Vacaville, California6.0%1.1%2,87148,23845,36749,98231,88481,866102,085
Mobile, Alabama5.9%0.6%5,26388,45883,19588,80860,873149,681185,097
Visalia, California5.9%0.9%4,01367,59463,58167,86738,445106,312142,649
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania5.9%0.4%10,120170,488160,368170,73692,707263,443303,620
Milwaukee, Wisconsin5.9%0.3%16,684281,082264,398281,280158,275439,555569,756
Palm Bay, Florida5.9%0.9%3,60760,86257,25561,38639,723101,109125,273
Winston-Salem, North Carolina5.9%0.6%7,220122,371115,151122,91776,091199,008250,887
Atlanta, Georgia5.9%0.5%16,857285,830268,973286,317135,701422,018499,287
Newport News, Virginia5.9%0.7%5,28989,75684,46798,52147,418145,939184,774
Aurora, Illinois5.9%0.7%5,894100,12694,232100,17137,994138,165179,867
Clovis, California5.9%1.0%3,50259,64656,14459,89531,27391,168122,719
Spokane Valley, Washington5.9%0.9%3,17854,19351,01554,46229,87884,340105,460
Hayward, California5.9%0.7%5,16988,15482,98588,39942,843131,242159,201
San Diego, California5.9%0.3%43,867748,690704,823788,942365,4301,154,3721,385,061
Pueblo, Colorado5.9%0.9%2,85348,72745,87449,07440,33989,413111,514
Greeley, Colorado5.8%0.8%3,26755,96352,69656,09629,59285,688109,421
San Antonio, Texas5.8%0.3%43,479744,811701,332758,111393,2451,151,3561,458,954
Rancho Cucamonga, California5.8%0.8%5,35791,93186,57492,02146,763138,784174,693
Jersey City, New Jersey5.8%0.6%9,643166,751157,108166,83270,298237,130289,691
Downey, California5.8%0.9%3,42759,37955,95259,50831,06690,574111,793
Joliet, Illinois5.8%0.8%4,60479,79275,18879,87936,126116,005149,785
Des Moines, Iowa5.7%0.6%6,872119,526112,654119,61749,586169,203212,464
Garden Grove, California5.7%0.6%5,09888,67583,57788,77150,288139,059170,603
Temecula, California5.7%1.0%3,07053,40050,33054,78528,29383,078110,404
Norman, Oklahoma5.7%0.7%3,94768,85664,90969,51038,777108,287128,714
Arlington, Texas5.7%0.5%12,348215,616203,268216,08792,048308,135394,769
Sparks, Nevada5.7%1.0%3,37159,25155,88059,40527,55086,955109,106
Wichita, Kansas5.7%0.4%11,538202,950191,412204,732106,171310,903396,488
Aurora, Colorado5.7%0.5%12,372217,939205,567219,91986,074305,993390,201
Minneapolis, Minnesota5.7%0.4%14,708259,886245,178260,32693,716354,042426,845
Tempe, Arizona5.6%0.9%6,537115,734109,197115,87746,926162,803186,419
San Francisco, California5.6%0.3%28,900513,866484,966514,336219,434733,770836,321
High Point, North Carolina5.6%0.9%3,19656,99453,79857,09235,20492,296115,263
Norwalk, California5.6%0.8%2,85051,18648,33651,28929,32680,615100,713
Vancouver, Washington5.6%0.8%5,635101,22495,589101,81853,889155,707192,696
Colorado Springs, Colorado5.5%0.5%14,069253,552239,483266,744121,064387,808483,099
Fort Wayne, Indiana5.5%0.6%7,615137,259129,644137,43571,382208,817266,235
Portland, Oregon5.5%0.4%21,405386,782365,377386,923161,072547,995642,715
Irvine, California5.5%0.7%9,127165,148156,021165,43583,099248,534308,160
Anaheim, California5.5%0.5%10,214184,854174,640185,04991,779276,828344,553
Kansas City, Kansas5.5%0.6%4,20976,24772,03876,47440,275116,749154,776
Torrance, California5.5%0.9%4,13075,00870,87875,23441,495116,729143,499
Port St. Lucie, Florida5.5%0.8%5,904107,265101,361107,52372,669180,192220,453
McAllen, Texas5.5%0.9%3,68667,25663,57067,35241,579108,931143,789
Coral Springs, Florida5.5%1.2%3,97072,59368,62372,72630,505103,231133,962
Odessa, Texas5.5%1.0%3,18458,31455,13058,38125,46283,843114,080
Santa Rosa, California5.5%0.8%5,25996,44991,19096,70848,423145,131177,216
Laredo, Texas5.5%0.7%6,262114,846108,584114,96868,993183,961255,949
Corona, California5.4%0.7%4,56783,89279,32584,13741,922126,059158,839
Corpus Christi, Texas5.4%0.5%8,335153,675145,340155,98493,752249,736317,383
West Palm Beach, Florida5.4%0.9%3,48364,24360,76064,33235,989100,321119,508
Huntington Beach, California5.4%0.6%5,933109,480103,547109,58856,167165,755196,010
Everett, Washington5.4%0.9%3,23960,02156,78261,47030,02591,495111,083
Oceanside, California5.4%0.5%4,82389,63984,81693,39346,672140,065172,542
Lowell, Massachusetts5.4%0.8%3,34862,34959,00162,41130,18192,592114,799
Fort Lauderdale, Florida5.3%0.7%5,400100,94895,548101,00053,786154,786183,032
Beaumont, Texas5.3%1.0%2,84053,09250,25253,32634,16387,489113,710
Tacoma, Washington5.3%0.5%6,363118,984112,621121,51060,385181,895220,482
Pasadena, California5.3%0.7%4,19578,45674,26178,49238,146116,638136,462
Gresham, Oregon5.3%0.9%3,13358,66555,53258,69731,34390,040112,818
Santa Clarita, California5.3%0.6%6,359119,267112,908119,31559,412178,727229,021
Albuquerque, New Mexico5.3%0.4%15,623293,931278,308296,349164,516460,865562,488
Fairfield, California5.3%0.9%3,09858,49655,39860,54634,15294,698119,985
Orlando, Florida5.3%0.7%9,495179,364169,869180,11971,889252,008311,732
Lehigh Acres, Florida5.3%1.0%3,17860,06856,89060,06836,67596,743127,391
Evansville, Indiana5.3%0.8%3,13359,40956,27659,40934,28993,698116,441
Salem, Oregon5.3%0.9%4,54186,11781,57686,52554,311140,836176,666
Glendale, Arizona5.3%0.5%6,569124,587118,018126,32268,421194,743250,193
Denton, Texas5.2%0.7%4,31182,45078,13982,48440,640123,124146,987
Indianapolis city (balance), Indiana5.2%0.4%24,243466,020441,777466,653219,499686,152882,043
Athens-Clarke County unified government (balance), Georgia5.2%0.9%3,47367,07063,59767,31140,328107,639126,987
Santa Ana, California5.2%0.5%8,507164,702156,195164,80483,735248,539311,639
Fort Collins, Colorado5.2%0.7%5,273102,25896,985102,69742,574145,271169,705
Grand Prairie, Texas5.2%0.8%5,369104,16198,792104,36545,449149,814198,564
Greensboro, North Carolina5.1%0.6%7,998156,548148,550157,13882,190239,328298,564
Phoenix, Arizona5.1%0.2%44,358869,141824,783870,196408,9771,279,1731,624,832
Columbus, Ohio5.1%0.3%25,970511,848485,878512,498213,472725,970906,480
Lakeland, Florida5.1%0.9%2,74254,16351,42154,35343,20197,554117,030
Lafayette, Louisiana5.1%0.8%3,12561,86658,74162,08936,35798,446121,537
St. Louis, Missouri5.0%0.4%8,179162,066153,887162,81781,437244,254293,109
Daly City, California5.0%0.8%2,98359,50156,51859,78529,40589,190102,560
Reno, Nevada5.0%0.5%7,425148,184140,759148,70572,730221,435268,959
Grand Rapids, Michigan5.0%0.6%5,489109,648104,159109,81150,031159,842197,768
Lexington-Fayette urban county, Kentucky5.0%0.4%8,866177,301168,435177,45583,874261,329321,122
Louisville/Jefferson County metro government (balance), Kentucky5.0%0.4%16,392328,228311,836329,160171,995501,155627,210
San Buenaventura (Ventura), California5.0%0.8%2,90458,31955,41558,58831,95690,544109,900
Urban Honolulu, Hawaii5.0%0.5%9,108183,706174,598191,993103,966295,959346,323
Miami, Florida5.0%0.5%12,556253,520240,964253,934126,610380,544446,663
Thousand Oaks, California4.9%0.7%3,21565,00761,79265,13538,982104,117125,676
St. Paul, Minnesota4.9%0.4%8,463171,171162,708171,33171,531242,862307,762
St. Petersburg, Florida4.9%0.6%7,106143,726136,620144,81479,214224,028260,646
Chattanooga, Tennessee4.9%0.7%4,70695,39890,69295,50652,990148,496182,832
Stamford, Connecticut4.9%0.8%4,00681,24677,24081,28331,885113,168135,806
Chesapeake, Virginia4.9%0.8%6,111124,023117,912132,28565,248197,533251,153
Dallas, Texas4.9%0.3%34,531700,892666,361701,693317,4761,019,1691,299,553
Garland, Texas4.9%0.7%6,405130,197123,792130,25159,037189,288245,298
Topeka, Kansas4.9%0.8%3,07462,61059,53662,86838,329101,197126,103
Fort Worth, Texas4.9%0.4%24,060490,932466,872492,691226,490719,181941,311
The Woodlands, Texas4.9%1.2%2,67854,66951,99154,74034,10088,840116,916
Costa Mesa, California4.9%0.7%3,31567,87764,56267,98924,43792,426110,538
Concord, California4.9%0.6%3,28367,24663,96367,30533,302100,607124,260
Goodyear, Arizona4.8%1.1%2,34948,46646,11748,96233,65382,615102,891
Roseville, California4.8%0.6%3,84079,26275,42279,58342,320121,903152,438
College Station, Texas4.8%0.7%3,11464,34161,22764,47639,109103,585122,280
Rio Rancho, New Mexico4.8%0.8%2,52852,41649,88852,66532,31584,980106,533
Gainesville, Florida4.8%0.8%3,52073,17369,65373,21953,237126,456143,611
Davenport, Iowa4.8%0.7%2,55053,12950,57953,25528,63981,894101,083
Lubbock, Texas4.8%0.5%6,560136,923130,363137,29970,880208,179261,078
Riverview, Florida4.8%1.1%2,79558,43155,63659,41423,58282,996107,776
Richardson, Texas4.8%0.8%3,25868,16264,90468,27528,14796,422118,269
Mesquite, Texas4.8%0.8%3,75578,73174,97678,77233,850112,622148,848
Concord, North Carolina4.8%1.1%2,70756,76654,05956,97323,67780,650106,518
Tampa, Florida4.7%0.5%9,943210,670200,727213,495107,756321,251393,389
Clearwater, Florida4.7%1.0%2,75458,39955,64558,57640,57499,150117,075
Kansas City, Missouri4.7%0.4%13,143278,770265,627279,516126,403405,919508,233
Orange, California4.7%0.8%3,56575,69572,13075,74837,643113,391138,723
Salinas, California4.7%0.7%3,44773,22769,78073,27145,744119,015161,993
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma4.7%0.4%16,686355,722339,036361,194174,576535,770688,693
Tyler, Texas4.7%0.9%2,53154,06351,53254,09731,49185,588107,718
Provo, Utah4.7%0.6%3,26169,88066,61969,97425,23095,204114,303
San Jose, California4.7%0.3%25,553547,738522,185548,145260,104808,249990,054
Wilmington, North Carolina4.6%0.8%3,01664,99961,98365,40535,520100,925118,578
Hillsboro, Oregon4.6%0.8%2,88262,11559,23362,11524,77886,893107,050
Jacksonville, Florida4.6%0.3%22,455485,398462,943500,893265,068765,961961,739
Lynn, Massachusetts4.6%0.9%2,45453,16850,71453,16826,68879,856100,905
Thornton, Colorado4.6%0.7%3,74681,38977,64381,50828,387109,895142,878
Denver, Colorado4.6%0.3%20,324441,933421,609443,076153,372596,448713,734
Miramar, Florida4.6%0.7%3,62278,84175,21978,91830,958109,876135,986
Mesa, Arizona4.6%0.4%12,044262,345250,301262,743140,321403,064507,478
Anchorage, Alaska4.6%0.5%6,811148,752141,941158,56668,691227,257289,069
Nashville-Davidson metropolitan government (balance), Tennessee4.6%0.4%18,357401,131382,774401,744154,493556,237684,298
Simi Valley, California4.5%0.6%3,12068,80065,68068,94635,068104,014125,769
Raleigh, North Carolina4.5%0.5%12,286272,250259,964272,502113,988386,490470,763
Sugar Land, Texas4.5%0.8%2,55056,53653,98656,61631,29587,911109,735
Lakewood, Colorado4.5%0.6%4,13791,77987,64291,97041,703133,673156,309
Austin, Texas4.5%0.3%27,169605,628578,459606,238202,202808,440967,862
Columbia, Maryland4.5%1.0%2,68059,80557,12560,49325,67686,169105,871
Escondido, California4.5%0.6%3,39575,93172,53676,47143,067119,538149,913
Renton, Washington4.5%0.7%2,69260,47357,78160,53725,43185,968105,279
Davie, Florida4.4%1.0%2,62559,19256,56759,30226,70086,002106,412
Charlotte, North Carolina4.4%0.3%22,496509,590487,094510,856194,368705,224886,283
Knoxville, Tennessee4.4%0.7%4,518102,78798,269102,90359,221162,124193,721
Metairie, Louisiana4.4%0.8%3,18472,68869,50472,98140,565113,546138,995
Santa Clara, California4.4%0.7%3,40477,71774,31377,97430,429108,403129,239
Waco, Texas4.4%0.8%3,02269,03466,01269,09943,268112,367141,925
West Valley City, Utah4.4%0.7%3,21173,55070,33973,84326,935100,778137,955
Huntsville, Alabama4.3%0.6%4,973114,373109,400114,71565,802180,517218,814
Springfield, Missouri4.3%0.6%3,80787,65383,84687,80454,988142,792169,432
Fremont, California4.3%0.4%5,336123,634118,298123,77759,337183,114228,518
Allen, Texas4.3%0.9%2,50358,08955,58658,10924,71482,823107,684
North Charleston, South Carolina4.3%0.8%2,64361,34058,69764,48228,72493,206117,460
Virginia Beach, Virginia4.3%0.4%10,036233,130223,094255,324112,054367,378457,066
Irving, Texas4.3%0.6%6,036140,500134,464140,67054,549195,219255,036
San Mateo, California4.3%0.9%2,55159,45756,90659,45726,04385,500103,555
Green Bay, Wisconsin4.3%0.7%2,43756,98554,54857,01026,87383,883106,585
Broken Arrow, Oklahoma4.3%0.8%2,59561,04358,44861,17928,78389,962115,919
Surprise, Arizona4.2%0.8%2,90468,49165,58769,46049,065118,525149,519
Little Rock, Arkansas4.2%0.7%4,271101,00796,736101,16657,620158,786202,739
Brandon, Florida4.2%0.9%2,64462,56159,91762,92232,34695,268116,365
Seattle, Washington4.2%0.3%20,234479,074458,840480,209167,905648,114741,440
Naperville, Illinois4.2%0.6%3,34279,85676,51479,94037,097117,037149,424
Omaha, Nebraska4.2%0.4%11,068264,610253,542265,672115,369381,041488,197
Frisco, Texas4.2%0.6%4,796115,005110,209115,04845,162160,210210,238
Pembroke Pines, Florida4.2%0.6%3,72389,36085,63789,70951,237140,946170,557
Durham, North Carolina4.2%0.6%6,783163,004156,221163,49072,647236,137288,465
Plano, Texas4.1%0.5%6,656161,599154,943161,86871,592233,460287,339
San Tan Valley, Arizona4.1%1.0%2,15652,79050,63452,89926,69779,596105,231
Sunnyvale, California4.1%0.6%3,68290,58686,90490,68634,638125,324153,455
Cape Coral, Florida4.1%0.6%4,095100,76996,674100,95173,778174,729206,387
West Jordan, Utah4.0%0.8%2,66466,16963,50566,35020,87287,222116,277
Bellevue, Washington4.0%0.6%3,33383,64480,31183,83740,827124,664151,199
Cedar Rapids, Iowa3.9%0.7%2,99576,06073,06576,09335,254111,347136,859
Lee's Summit, Missouri3.9%0.8%2,17955,60753,42855,97024,00279,972102,583
Columbia, Missouri3.9%0.8%2,69669,05466,35869,26536,306105,571127,200
Arvada, Colorado3.9%0.6%2,80572,09169,28672,10528,920101,025122,835
Fargo, North Dakota3.9%0.7%3,05379,09576,04279,51626,536106,052129,064
Rochester, Minnesota3.8%0.7%2,60467,76165,15767,80128,18095,981121,638
Manchester, New Hampshire3.8%1.0%2,68469,86667,18269,97927,33097,309115,415
Salt Lake City, Utah3.8%0.4%4,819126,093121,274126,17846,911173,089203,888
Boise City, Idaho3.8%0.7%5,108135,136130,028135,62662,015197,641235,701
Westminster, Colorado3.8%0.8%2,61369,63967,02669,83825,78595,623115,546
Sandy Springs, Georgia3.7%0.9%2,49866,68064,18266,79623,34290,138107,198
Lewisville, Texas3.7%0.7%2,86976,93174,06277,04624,800101,846128,313
Bend, Oregon3.7%0.7%2,10556,58954,48456,64426,79483,438101,472
Hialeah, Florida3.7%0.4%4,319116,642112,323116,72172,277188,998221,901
Highlands Ranch, Colorado3.7%0.6%2,08857,08154,99357,59922,72180,320101,437
Centennial, Colorado3.7%0.8%2,19260,04057,84860,21026,35286,562107,386
Chandler, Arizona3.6%0.4%5,699157,225151,526157,34763,562220,909278,123
Midland, Texas3.6%0.9%2,47168,64866,17768,81129,37398,184133,998
Round Rock, Texas3.6%0.7%2,55170,98468,43371,09627,49798,593124,288
League City, Texas3.6%0.8%2,18260,77458,59261,07926,95288,031114,885
Amarillo, Texas3.6%0.6%3,58099,76296,182100,16353,948154,111200,945
Ann Arbor, Michigan3.6%0.6%2,33065,21862,88865,36741,956107,323121,179
Murfreesboro, Tennessee3.6%0.6%3,21290,20386,99190,41234,885125,297157,547
Billings, Montana3.5%0.6%2,18162,60460,42362,61432,03794,651118,321
Peoria, Arizona3.5%0.5%3,29795,16791,87095,34460,846156,190194,338
Wichita Falls, Texas3.5%0.6%1,64347,54445,90152,49329,46981,962102,558
McKinney, Texas3.5%0.6%3,772109,240105,468109,28543,827153,112202,314
Scottsdale, Arizona3.4%0.4%4,482130,545126,063130,61381,646212,259242,169
Charleston, South Carolina3.4%0.7%2,92085,72982,80987,10541,167128,272152,014
Overland Park, Kansas3.4%0.5%3,837113,712109,875113,92745,124159,051197,199
Cary, North Carolina3.4%0.5%3,25796,78993,53296,94443,132140,076176,686
Cambridge, Massachusetts3.4%0.6%2,44872,85370,40573,00432,011105,015117,794
Alexandria, Virginia3.4%0.5%3,31598,91695,601102,28028,439130,719156,788
Gilbert, Arizona3.3%0.5%4,841146,006141,165146,06156,720202,781271,118
Lincoln, Nebraska3.3%0.4%5,391164,604159,213165,04969,970235,019291,932
Arlington, Virginia3.3%0.4%4,913150,497145,584153,95243,404197,356235,463
Carrollton, Texas3.2%0.5%2,56480,98078,41681,08428,289109,373132,741
Pearland, Texas3.1%0.9%1,99965,21863,21965,53329,63395,166125,983
Fishers, Indiana2.8%1.0%1,59056,15354,56356,63820,09576,733100,918
Olathe, Kansas2.8%0.6%2,26080,37678,11680,78029,443110,223143,720
Nampa, Idaho2.8%0.5%1,52054,54253,02254,62527,83782,462106,289
Carmel, Indiana2.7%0.7%1,49354,88153,38854,96723,87578,842100,501
Abilene, Texas2.7%0.6%1,56357,85056,28762,63738,169100,806127,130
Madison, Wisconsin2.7%0.3%4,429165,351160,922165,55269,169234,721275,568
Meridian, Idaho2.4%0.5%1,59266,06264,47066,31728,88095,197124,865
Sioux Falls, South Dakota2.3%0.4%2,627114,082111,455114,30639,288153,594197,642

Image files

Download all

Figure 1

Unemployment rate, US cities

Figure 1: Unemployment rate, US cities
DownloadPDFImageCSV

Figure 2

Unemployment rate, all published cities

Figure 2: Unemployment rate, all published cities
DownloadPDFImageCSV

About this data

  • The unemployment rate is unemployed people divided by the civilian labor force for the population 16 years and over (ACS table B23025). It is not the official monthly BLS unemployment rate.
  • A city unemployment rate is that city's own share, so these figures cannot be averaged to produce a national figure. A midpoint of city rates is not the US unemployment rate.
  • Only Census places with at least 100,000 residents on the 2023 ACS five-year total population estimate (table B01003) are included. Smaller places are left out.
  • Puerto Rico places that meet the population cutoff are in the ranking and table. Alaska and Hawaii cities appear on the ranking; on the map they are shown in inset when a packaged city dot exists.
  • Places without a packaged map dot stay in the ranking and table.
  • Some margins of error are ACS controlled-estimate sentinels (for example ***** / −555,555,555) rather than ordinary sampling errors. Those values are stored as missing and shown as a dash.